Broadband adoption and content consumption

Information Economics and Policy

Volumn 19, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 362-378

  Hitt, Lorin ^a   Tambe, Prasanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Broadband adoption; Digital divide; Internet; Media; Telecommunications policy

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PUBLIC POLICY; TELECOMMUNICATION;

BROADBAND ACCESS; INFORMATION CONSUMPTION; TELECOMMUNICATION POLICY;

BROADBAND NETWORKS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; MEDIA ROLE; PANEL DATA; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 34548317502     PISSN: 01676245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abadie A., Drukker D., Herr D., and Imbens G. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in stata. The Stata Journal 1 (2001) 1-18
2. Autor D. Wiring the labor market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 1 (2001) 25-40
3. Becker G.S. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (1993), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
4. Brodie M., Flournoy R.E., Altman D.E., Blendon R.J., Benson J.M., and Rosenbaum M.D. Health information, the internet, and the digital divide. Health Affairs 19 6 (2000) 255-265
5. Crandall R., and Jackson C. The $500 Billion Dollar Opportunity: The Potential Economic Benefit of Widespread Diffusion of Broadband Internet Access (2001), Criterion Economics, Washington, DC
6. Dimaggio, P., Hargittai, E., 2001. From the digital divide to digital inequality: studying internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Working Paper, Summer 2001.
7. Goldfarb, A., Prince, J., 2006. Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: implications for the digital divide. Cornell University Working Paper.
8. Heckman J., Ichimura H., and Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies 64 4 (1997) 605-654
9. Hong, S., 2006. The effect of digital technology on the sales of copyrighted goods: evidence from Napster. Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign.
10. Greenstein, S., Prince, J., 2006. The diffusion of the internet and the geography of the digital divide in the United States. Cornell University Working Paper.
11. Hoffman D.L., and Novak T.P. Bridging the racial divide on the internet. Science 280 (1998) 390-391
12. Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., Kiesler, S., 1996. HomeNet: a field trial of residential internet services. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
13. Liebowitz, S., 2006. Testing file-sharing's impact by examining record sales in cities. Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas.
14. Madden G., and Simpson M. A probit model of household broadband service subscription intentions: a regional analysis. Information Economics and Policy 8 3 (1996) 249-267
15. Norris P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Parker E.B. Closing the digital divide in rural America. Telecommunications Policy 24 (2000) 281-290
17. Prieger J. The supply side of digital divide: is there equal availability in the broadband internet access market?. Economic Inquiry 41 2 (2003) 346-363
18. Rappoport P., Kridel D., and Taylor L. The demand for broadband: access, content, and the value of time. In: Crandall R., and Alleman J. (Eds). Broadband: Should We Regulate High-Speed Internet Access? (2002), AEI- Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, DC
19. Varian, H., 2001. The demand for bandwidth: evidence from the INDEX project. Working Paper.