Ontogeny and structure of the acervulate partial inflorescence in Hyophorbe lagenicaulis (Arecaceae; Arecoideae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1517-1527

  Ortega Chavez N ^a   Stauffer, F W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

acervulus; Arecoideae; Chamaedoreeae; development; Hyophorbe lagenicaulis; partial inflorescence

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; FLOWER; GARDEN; MONOCOTYLEDON; ONTOGENY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WILD POPULATION;

ARECACEAE; ARTICLE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INFLORESCENCE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ARECACEAE; INFLORESCENCE;

ARECACEAE; ARECOIDEAE; HYOPHORBE LAGENICAULIS;

EID: 81855211105     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr149     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adam H, Jouannic S, Escoute J, Verdeil JL, Tregear J. 2005. Reproductive developmental complexity in the African oil palm (Elaeis guianeensis, Arecaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1836-1852. (Pubitemid 41540865)
2. Askgaard A, Stauffer FW, Barfod A. 2008. Floral structure and systematics in Chamaedorea (Arecaceae: Arecoideae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 65: 197-210.
3. Asmussen CB, Chase M. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. American Journal of Botany 88: 1103-1117. (Pubitemid 33651658)
4. Asmussen CB, Dransfield J, Deickmann V, Barfod AS, Pintaud JC, Baker W. 2006. A new subfamily classification of the palm family (Arecaceae): evidence from plastid DNA phylogeny. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 15-38.
5. BakerW, Asmussen C, Barrow S, Dransfield J, Hedderson T. 1999. A phylogenetic study of palm family (Palmae) based on chloroplast DNA sequences from the trnL-trnF region. Plant Systematics and Evolution 219: 111-126. (Pubitemid 30052165)
6. Baker W, Savolainen V, Asmussen-Lange C, et al. 2009. Complete genericlevel phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of Supertree and Supermatrix Approaches. Systematic Biology 58: 240-256.
7. Bernbeck F. 1932. Vergleichende Morphologie der Urticaceen- und Moraceen-Infloreszenzen. Botanische Abhandlungen 19: 1-100.
8. Buzgo M. 2001. Flower structure and development of Araceae compared with alismatids and Acoraceae. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 136: 393-425. (Pubitemid 32706721)
9. Corner EJH. 1966. The natural history of palms, 1st edn. London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
10. Cuenca A, Asmussen-Lange C. 2007. Phylogeny of the palm tribe Chamaedoreeae (Arecaceae) based on plastid DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 32: 250-263. (Pubitemid 47052468)
11. Cuenca A, Asmussen-Lange C, Borchsenius F. 2008. A dated phylogeny of the palm tribe Chamaedoreeae supports Eocene dispersal between Africa, North and South America. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 46: 760-775. (Pubitemid 351215925)
12. Cuenca A, Dransfield J, Asmussen-Lange C. 2009. Phylogeny and evolution of morphological characters in tribe Chamaedoreeae (Arecaceae). Taxon 58: 1092-1108.
13. Dransfield J, Uhl N. 1998. Palmae. In: Kubitzki K. ed. Families and genera of vascular plants. IV. Flowering plants. Monocotyledons. Heidelberg: Springer, 306-388.
14. Dransfield J, Uhl N, Asmussen C, Baker W, Harley M, Lewis C. 2008. Genera Palmarum, the evolution and classification of palms. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. Endress PK. 2010. Disentangling confusions in inflorescence morphology: patterns and diversity of reproductive shoot ramification in angiosperms. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 225-239.
16. Endress PK, Doyle JA. 2009. Reconstructing the ancestral flower and its initial specializations. American Journal of Botany 96: 22-66.
17. Hagemann W. 1963. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Organisation des Sprossscheitelmeristems; der Vegetationspunkt traubiger Floreszenzen. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 82: 273-315.
18. Hagemann W. 1975. Eine mögliche Strategie der vergleichenden Morphologie zur phylogenetischen Rekonstruktion. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 96: 107-124.
19. Hahn W. 2002a. A molecular phylogenetic study of the Palmae (Arecaceae) based on atpB, rcbL and 18S nrDNA sequences. Systematic Biology 51: 92-112. (Pubitemid 35169409)
20. Hahn W. 2002b. A phylogenetic analysis of the Arecoid Line of palms based on plastid DNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 189-204. (Pubitemid 34703375)
21. Henderson A, Galeano G, Bernal R. 1995. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Hodel DR. 1992. Chamaedorea palms: the species and their cultivation. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.
23. Igersheim A, Cichocki O. 1996. A simple method for microtome sectioning of prehistoric charcoal specimens, embedded in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 92: 389-393.
24. Lewis C, Doyle J. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear gene malate synthase in the palm family (Arecaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 409-420. (Pubitemid 32566644)
25. Lewis C, Doyle J. 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of tribe Areceae (Arecaceae) using two low-copy nuclear genes. Plant Systematics and Evolution 236: 1-17. (Pubitemid 36052903)
26. Moore HE. 1971. The genus Synechanthus (Palmae). Principes 15: 10-19.
27. Müller-Doblies D, Müller-Doblies U. 1987. Cautious improvements of a descriptive terminology of inflorescences. Monocot Newsletter 4: 1-13.
28. Perera P, Hocher V, Weerakoon L, Yakandawala D, Fernando S, Verdeil JL. 2010. Early inflorescence and floral development in Cocos nucifera L. (Arecaceae: Arecoideae). South African Journal of Botany 76: 482-492.
29. Prenner G. 2004. New aspects in floral development of Papilionoideae: initiated but suppressed bracteoles and variable initiation of sepals. Annals of Botany 93: 537-545. (Pubitemid 41295608)
30. Rudall P, Sokoloff D, Remizowa M, et al. 2007. Morphology of Hydatellaceae, an anomalous aquatic family recently recognized as an early-divergent angiosperm lineage. American Journal of Botany 94: 1073-1092. (Pubitemid 47052450)
31. Thomas M, Garwood N, Baker W, et al. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the palms genus Chamaedorea, based on the low-copy nuclear genes PRK and RPB2. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 398-415. (Pubitemid 43069385)
32. Troll W. 1964. Die infloreszenzen: Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers, Vol. 1. Stuttgart: Fischer.
33. Troll W. 1969. Die Infloreszenzen: Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Vol. 2, Part 1. Stuttgart: Fischer.
34. Uhl NW, Moore HE. 1978. The structure of the acervulus, the flower cluster of Chamaedoreoid palms. American Journal of Botany 65: 197-204.
35. Uhl NW, Dransfield J, Davis JI, Luckow MA, Hansen KS, Doyle JJ. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among palms: cladistic analysis of morphological and chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. In: Rudall P, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ. eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 623-661.
36. Vegetti AC, Weberling F. 1996. Structure of the paracladial zone in Poaceae. Flora 190: 225-228.
37. Weberling F, Müller-Doblies U, Müller-Doblies D. 1993. Zur deskriptiven und vergleichend-morphologischen Terminologie komplexer Infloreszenzen. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 67: 453-473.