A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 608-612

  Algera, T J ^a   Feilzer, A J ^a   Prahl Andersen, B ^a   Kleverlaan, C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND XT; WATER;

ADHESION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CATTLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADHESIVENESS; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 81855206485     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq112     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Algera T J, Kleverlaan C J, de Gee A J, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer A J 2005 The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. European Journal of Orthodontics 27: 472-476 (Pubitemid 41442937)
2. Algera T J, Kleverlaan C J, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer A J 2008a The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength. European Journal of Orthodontics 30: 490-494
3. Algera T J, Kleverlaan C J, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer A J 2008b The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system. American Journal of Dentistry 21: 239-243
4. Årtun J, Bergland S 1984 Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 333-340
5. Geng J P, Tan K B, Liu G R 2001 Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 85: 585-598 (Pubitemid 33601386)
6. Haydar B, Sarikaya S, Cehreli Z C 1999 Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthodontist 69: 457-462
7. Higg W A, Lucksanasombool P, Higgs R J, Swain M V 2001 Evaluating acrylic and glass-ionomer cement strength using the biaxial flexure test. Biomaterials 22: 1583-1590 (Pubitemid 32551907)
8. Katona T R 1997 A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112: 244-251
9. Katona T R, Long R W 2006 Effect of loading mode on bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with 2 systems. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 60-64 (Pubitemid 43155750)
10. O'Brien K D, Read M J, Sandison R J, Roberts C T 1989 A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 95: 348-351
11. Walker M P, Spencer P, Eick J D 2003 Effect of simulated resin-bonded fixed partial denture clinical conditions on resin cement mechanical properties. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 30: 837-846 (Pubitemid 37255787)