The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 490-494

  Algera, Tjalling J ^a,b   Kleverlaan, Cornelis J ^a   Prahl Andersen, Birte ^a   Feilzer, Albert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; FUJI IX GP FAST; FUJI ORTHO LC; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; TIN; TRANSBOND XT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ENAMEL MICROABRASION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SILANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIN;

EID: 54249146997     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn029     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Algera T J, Kleverlaan C J, de Gee A J, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer A J 2005 The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. European Journal Orthodontics 27: 472-476
2. Algera T J, Kleverlaan C J, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer A J 2006 The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials 22: 852-856
3. Algera T J, Kleverlaan C J, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer A J 2008 The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system. American Journal of Dentistry (in press)
4. Arici S, Ozer M, Arici N, Gencer Y 2006 Effects of sandblasting metal bracket base on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 17: 253-258
5. Årtun J, Bergland S 1984 Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 333-340
6. Benson P E, Shah A A, Millett D T, Dyer F, Parkin N, Vine R S 2005 Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review. Journal of Orthodontics 32: 102-114
7. Bishara S E, Soliman M M, Oonsombat C, Laffoon J F, Ajlouni R 2004 The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontist 74: 400-404
8. Chung K, Hsu B, Berry T, Hsieh T 2001 Effect of sandblasting on the bond strength of the bondable molar tube bracket. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28: 418-424
9. Corry A, Millett D T, Creanor S L, Foye R H, Gilmour W H 2003 Effect of fluoride exposure on cariostatic potential of orthodontic bonding agents: an in vitro evaluation. Journal of Orthodontics 30: 323-329
10. Kern M, Thompson V P 1993 Sandblasting and silica-coating of dental alloys: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. Dental Materials 9: 151-161
11. Knox J, Hubsch P, Jones M L, Middleton J 2000 The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket-cement interface. Journal of Orthodontics 27: 249-254
12. Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch P, Middleton J, Jones M L 2001 An evaluation of the quality of orthodontic attachment offered by single- and doublemesh bracket bases using the finite element method of stress analysis. Angle Orthodontist 71: 149-155
13. Lopez J I 1980 Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 669-678
14. MacColl G A, Rossouw P E, Titley K C, Yamin C 1998 The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 276-281
15. Miguel J A, Almeida M A, Chevitarese O 1995 Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 107: 484-487
16. Millett D, McCabe J F, Gordon P H 1993 The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. British Journal of Orthodontics 20: 117-122
17. Newman G V, Newman R A, Sun B I, Ha J L, Ozsoylu S A 1995 Adhesion promoters, their effect on the bond strength of metal brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 108: 237-241
18. Ozer M, Arici S 2005 Sandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Angle Orthodontist 75: 406-409
19. Reynolds I R, von Fraunhofer J A 1976 Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. British Journal of Orthodontics 3: 91-95
20. Sonis A L 1996 Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 96-98
21. Swartz J M, Davis R D, Overton J D 2000 Tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to microabraded and silica-coated or tinplated high noble ceramic alloy. Journal of Prosthodontics 9: 195-200
22. Tavares S W, Consani S, Nouer D F, Magnani M B, Nouer P R, Martins L M 2006 Shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets to enamel. Brazilian Dental Journal 17: 44-48
23. Tiller H J, Magnus B, Gobel R, Musil R, Garschke A 1985a Sand-blasting process and its use in surface conditioning of dental alloys (I). Quintessenz 36: 1927-1934
24. Tiller H J et al. 1985b Sand blasting procedures and its effect on the surface properties of dental alloys (II). Quintessenz 36: 2151-2158
25. Willems G, Carels C E, Verbeke G 1997 In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design. Journal of Dentistry 25: 271-278