Influence of pressure control levels on the pulse pressure variations: An animal study using healthy piglets

Shock

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 628-632

  Lee, Chih Hsin ^a,b,c   Wu, Yao Kuang ^a,c   Wang, Jann Yuan ^d   Lan, Chou Chin ^a,c   Lee, Chun Yi ^b   Hsu, Kuei Yao ^b   Chao, Kun Mao ^a   Chang, Hung ^e,f  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b BUDDHIST TZU CHI GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c TZU CHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d Taiwan University Hospital   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

^f TRI SERVICE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

heart lung interaction; mechanical ventilation; monitoring; shock; Volume responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; EXTRASYSTOLE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK; INTENSIVE CARE; NONHUMAN; PIGLET; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION;

ANIMALS; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART; LUNG; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SWINE;

EID: 81755180528     PISSN: 10732322     EISSN: 15400514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182353395     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121(6):2000-2008, 2002. (Pubitemid 34634425)
2. Lee CH, Wang JY, Wu YK, Chiu HW, Lan CC, Chang H, Chen CY: Pulse pressure power spectrum predicts volume responsiveness in shock patients without sedation. Shock 33(5):454-459, 2010.
3. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(1):134-138, 2000. (Pubitemid 30469810)
4. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, Easton P, Ferland A: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 126(5):1563-1568, 2004. (Pubitemid 39525032)
5. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 95(6):746-755, 2005. (Pubitemid 41762372)
6. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Kipnis E, Onimus J, Robin E, Lebuffe G, Decoene C, Pruvot FR, Vallet B: Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 97(6):808-816, 2006. (Pubitemid 44823665)
7. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A: Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 128(2): 848-854, 2005. (Pubitemid 41140517)
8. Michard F, Teboul JL: Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 4(5):282-289, 2000.
9. Vallee F, Richard JC, Mari A, Gallas T, Arsac E, Verlaan PS, Chousterman B, Samii K, Genestal M, Fourcade O: Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 35(6):1004-1010, 2009.
10. Vieillard-Baron A, Loubieres Y, Schmitt JM, Page B, Dubourg O, Jardin F: Cyclic changes in right ventricular output impedance during mechanical ventilation. J Appl Physiol 87(5):1644-1650, 1999.
11. da Silva Ramos FJ, de Oliveira EM, Park M, Schettino GP, Azevedo LC: Heartlung interactions with different ventilatory settings during acute lung injury and hypovolaemia: an experimental study. Br J Anaesth 106(3):394-402, 2011.
12. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, Weis FC, Kilger E, Lamm P, Goetz AE: Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 29(3):476-480, 2003. (Pubitemid 36379453)
13. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL: Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31(4):517-523, 2005. (Pubitemid 40543882)
14. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Runge I, Legras A, Dequin PF, Mercier E, Wolff M, Regnier B, Boulain T: Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 15(2):R85, 2011.
15. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1996.
16. Lee CH, Wang JY, Huang KL, Chiu HW, Fei TC, Chen TS, Chang H: Unreliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output in piglets simulating acute hemorrhagic shock and rapid volume expansion. J Trauma 68(6):1357-1361, 2010.
17. Vieillard-Baron A, Prin S, Chergui K, Dubourg O, Jardin F: Hemodynamic instability in sepsis: bedside assessment by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168(11):1270-1276, 2003. (Pubitemid 37487319)
18. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, Abiad M, Segal E, Coriat P: Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: the respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 100(4):942-945, 2005. (Pubitemid 40404192)
19. Romand JA, Shi W, Pinsky MR: Cardiopulmonary effects of positive pressure ventilation during acute lung injury. Chest 108(4):1041-1048, 1995.