Genotypic variability and genotype by environment interactions for inulin content of Jerusalem artichoke germplasm

Euphytica

Volumn 183, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 119-131

  Puttha, Ratchanee ^a   Jogloy, Sanun ^a   Wangsomnuk, Preeya P ^b   Srijaranai, Supalax ^b   Kesmala, Thawan ^a   Patanothai, Aran ^a  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Khon Kaen University   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Biomass; Days to maturity; Helianthus tuberosus L.; Tuber yield

Indexed keywords

HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS;

EID: 81555213479     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0520-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Azis BH, Chin B, Deacon MP, Harding SE, Pavlov GM (1999) Size and shape of inulin in dimethyl sulphoxide solution. Carbohyd Poly 38: 231-234.
2. Baldini M, Danuso F, Turi M, Vannozzi GP (2004) Evaluation of new clones of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for inulin and sugar yield from stalks and tubers. Ind Crop Prod 19: 25-40.
3. Ben Chekroun M, Amzile J, Mokhtari A, El Haloui NE, Prevost J, Fontanillas R (1996) Comparison of fructose production by 37 cultivars of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). NZ J Crop Hort Sci 24: 115-120.
4. Berenji J, Sikora V (2001) Variability and stability of tuber yield of Jerusalem atichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Helia 24: 25-32.
5. Bricker AA (1989) MSTAT-C user's guide. Michigan State University, East Lansing.
6. Cherbut C (2002) Inulin and oligofructose in the dietary fibre concept. Br J Nutr 87: S159-S162.
7. Coussement Paul AA (1999) Inulin and oligofructose: safe intakes and legal status. J Nutr 129: 1412S-1417S.
8. Danilčenko H, Jarienė E, Aleknavičienė P, Gajewski M (2008) Quality of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers in relation to storage conditions. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj 36: 23-27.
9. Davidson MH, Maki KC (1999) Effects of dietary inulin on serum lipids. J Nutr 129: 1474S-1477S.
10. Geng-Mao Z, Zhao-Pu L, Ming-Da C, Shi-Wei G (2008) Soil properties and yield of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) with seawater irrigation in North China plain. Pedosphere 18: 195-202.
11. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12. Hellwege EM, Czapla S, Jahnke A, Willmitzer L, Heyer AG (2000) Transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers synthesize the full spectrum of inulin molecules naturally occurring in globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus) roots. PNAS 97: 8699-8704.
13. Kays SJ, Nottingham SF (2008) Biology and chemistry of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). CRC Press, Florida.
14. Kiru S, Nasenko I (2010) Use of genetic resources from Jerusalem artichoke collection of N. Vavilov institute in breeding for bioenergy and health security. Agron Res 8: 625-632.
15. Kleessen B, Schwarz S, Boehm A, Fuhrmann H, Richter A, Henle T, Krueger M (2007) Jerusalem artichoke and chicory inulin in bakery products affect faecal microbiota of healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr 98: 540-549.
16. Kocsis L, Kaul H-P, Praznik W, Liebhard P (2007a) Influence of harvest date on shoot and tuber yield of different Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in the semiarid production area of Austria. Ger J Agron 11: 67-76.
17. Kocsis L, Liebhard P, Praznik W (2007b) Effect of seasonal changes on content and profile of soluble carbohydrates in tubers of different varieties of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). J Agric Food Chem 55: 9401-9408.
18. Kocsis L, Liebhard P, Praznik W (2008) Influence of harvest date on tuber growth, tuber dry matter content, inulin and sugar yield of different Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) cultivars in the semiarid production area of Austria. Ger J Agron 12: 8-21.
19. Lebot V (2009) Tropical root and tuber crop: cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids. CABI, UK.
20. Milner JA (1999) Functional foods and health promotion. J Nutr 129: 1395S-1397S.
21. Moerman FT, van Leeuwen MB, Delcour JA (2004) Enrichment of higher molecular weight fractions in inulin. J Agric Food Chem 52: 3780-3783.
22. Monti A, Amaducci MT, Pritoni G, Venturi G (2005) Growth, fructan yield and quality of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as related to photosynthetic capacity, harvest time, and water regime. J Exp Bot 56: 1389-1395.
23. Muir JG, Shepherd SJ, Rosella O, Rose R, Barrett JS, Gibson PR (2007) Fructan and free fructose content of common Australian vegetables and fruit. J Agric Food Chem 55: 6619-6627.
24. Niness KR (1999) Inulin and oligofructose: what are they?. J Nutr 129: 1402S-1406S.
25. Ordoñez JR SA, Hernandez JE, Guzman PS, Borromeo TH, Redoña ED (2005) Genetic variance and breeding potential of restorer lines in Philippine rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm. SABRAO J Breed Genet 37: 159-169.
26. Pimsaen W, Jogloy S, Suriharn B, Kesmala T, Pensuk V, Patanothai A (2010) Genotype by environment (G × E) interactions for yield components of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Asian J Plant Sci 9: 11-19.
27. Prosky L, Hoebregs H (1999) Methods to determine food inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr 129: 1418S-1423S.
28. Raccuia SA, Melilli MG (2010) Seasonal dynamics of biomass, inulin, and water-soluble sugars in roots of Cynara cardunculus L. Field Crop Res 116: 147-153.
29. Roberfroid MB (1999) Caloric value of inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr 129: 1436S-1437S.
30. Roberfroid B (2007a) Prebiotics: the concept revisited. J Nutr 137: 830S-837S.
31. Roberfroid MB (2007b) Inulin-type fructans: functional food ingredients. J Nutr 137: 2493S-2502S.
32. Rodrigues MA, Sousa L, Cabanas JE, Arrobas M (2007) Tuber yield and leaf mineral composition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) grown under different cropping practices. Span J Agric Res 5: 545-553.
33. Saengkanuk A, Nuchadomrong S, Jogloy S, Patanothai A, Srijaranai S (2011) A simplified spectrophotometric method for the determination of inulin in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers. Eur Food Res Technol (accepted).
34. Schittenhelm S (1999) Agronomic performance of root chicory, Jerusalem artichoke, and sugarbeet in stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci 39: 1815-1823.
35. Seiler GJ, Campbell LG (2004) Genetic variability for mineral element concentrations of wild Jerusalem artichoke forage. Crop Sci 44: 289-292.
36. Seiler GJ, Campbell LG (2006) Genetic variability for mineral concentration in the forage Jerusalem artichoke cultivars. Euphytica 150: 281-288.
37. Serieys H, Souyris I, Gil A, Poinso B, Bervillé A (2010) Diversity of Jerusalem artichoke clones (Helianthus tuberosus L.) from the INRA-Montpellier collection. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57: 1207-1215.
38. Shu C-K (1998) Flavor components generated from inulin. J Agric Food Chem 46: 1964-1965.
39. Statistix8 (2003) Statistix8: analytical software user's manual. Tallahassee, Florida.
40. Stevens CV, Meriggi A, Booten K (2001) Chemical modification of inulin, a valuable renewable resource, and its industrial applications. Biol Macromol 2: 1-16.
41. Terzić S, Atlagić J (2009) Nitrogen and sugar content variability in tubers of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Genetika 41: 289-295.
42. Valluru R, van den Ende W (2008) Plant fructans in stress environments: emerging concepts and future prospects. J Exp Bot 59: 2905-2916.
43. Vasić D, Miladinović J, Marjanović-Jeromela A, Škorić D (2002) Variability between Helianthus tuberosus accessions collected in the USA and Montenegro. Helia 25: 79-84.
44. Xiao-Hua L, Zeng-Rong H, Yu-Ling H, Jian K, Zhen-Hua Z, Zhao-Pu L (2010) Response of two Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) cultivars differing in tolerance to salt treatment. Pedosphere 20: 515-524.
45. Zaky EA (2009) Physiological response to diets fortified with Jerusalem artichoke tubers (Helianthus tuberosus L.) powder by diabetic rats. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 5: 682-688.