Comparison of fructose production by 37 cultivars of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 115-120

  Chekroun, M Ben ^a,c   Amzile, J ^a,c   Mokhtari, A ^a   El Haloui, N E ^a   Prevost, J ^b   Fontanillas, R ^b  

^a IBN TOFAIL UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

^b Laboratory of Plant Ecology   (France)

^c CHOUAIB DOUKKALI UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Cultivar; Early; Fructan; Fructose; Helianthus tuberosusL; Jerusalem artichoke; Late

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346516553     PISSN: 01140671     EISSN: 11758783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.1996.9513943     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Baillarge, E., 1942. Le Topinambour. Ses usages, sa culture Edited by:Flammarion. 187Paris
2. Barloy, J., 1984. Etude sur les bases genetiques, agronomiques et physiologiques de la culture du Topinambour. Bases agronomiques physiologiques et techniques, Rapport COMES-AFME 1982–1983 41Rennes:laboratoire d ‘Agronomic Institut national de recherche agonomique.
3. Ben Chekroun, M., Amzile, J., El Haloui, N. E., and Prevost, J., 1994a. Optimum harvest time for fructose production of the Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Cahiers agricultures, 3:319–322.
4. Ben Chekroun, M., Amzile, J., El Yachioui, M., El Haloui, N. E., and Prevost, J., 1994b. Quantitative and qualitative development of carbohydrate reserves during the biological cycle of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers. New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 22:31–37.
5. Ben Chekroun, M., Amzile, J., El Yachioui, M., and Prevost, J., 1993. Le Topinambour une alternative pour la production de fructose. Revue Reseau A melioration de la Production Agricole du Milieu Aride, 5:113–122.
6. Bergmeyer, H. U., Berut, E., Schmidt, F., and Stork, H., 1974. Methods of enzymatic analysis, 1196–1197. New York:Academic Press Inc.
7. Blanchet, D., 1982. Methodes analytiques relatives a l'utilisationindustrielledu Topinambour, 26Institut Franchise du petrole. Direction de recherche. Environnement et biologie petroliere.
8. ème cycle, 141Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc.
9. Le Cochec, F., 1981. Etude sur les bases génétiques, agronomiques et physiologiques de la culture du Topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.), 7Compte rendu de la station d'amélioration des plantes I.N.R.A., le R.H.E.U.
10. Prevost, J., Amzile, J., Ben Chekroun, M., and Fontanillas, R., 1994. Le Topinambour:une production d'avenir ou du passé. Revue Reseau Amélioration de la Production Agricole du Milieu Aride, 6:41–63.
11. Sattler, L., and Zerban, F. W., 1948. The anthrone reaction as affected by carbohydrate structure. Science, 108:207
12. Soja, G., Dersch, G., and Prasnik, W., 1990. Harvest dates, fertiliser and varietal effects on yield, concentration and molecular distribution of fructan in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Journal of agronomy and crop science, 165:181–189.
13. 14C-assimilates in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Journal of plant physiology, 134:218–223.