Systematic modeling and model-based simulation of a remotely operated vehicle using matlab and simulink

International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 481-511

  Chin, C S ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

dynamic equation; kinematic equation; MATLAB ; Modeling; remotely operated vehicle; simulation; Simulink

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID DYNAMICS; HARDWARE; MATLAB; MODELS; REMOTE CONTROL; SAILING VESSELS; VEHICLES;

DYNAMIC EQUATIONS; DYNAMIC MODEL AND SIMULATION; HYDRODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS; KINEMATIC EQUATIONS; REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES (ROV); SIMULATION; SIMULINK; UNDERWATER ROBOTIC VEHICLE;

REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES;

EID: 81455144019     PISSN: 17939623     EISSN: 17939615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1793962311000566     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jalving B., The NDRE-AUV flight controls system, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 19(4):497-501, 1994.
2. Healey A. J., Lienard D., Multivariable sliding mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 18(3):327-339, 1993.
3. Gomes R. M. F., Sousa J. B., Pereira F. L., Modelling and control of the IES project ROV, Proceedings of European Control Conference, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
4. Antonelli G., Chiaverini S., Sarkar N., West M., Adaptive control of an autonomous underwater vehicle: Experimental results on ODIN, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 9(5):756-765, 2001. (Pubitemid 32933437)
5. Fjellstad O.-E., Fossen T. I., Position and attitude tracking of AUVs: A quaternion feedback approach, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 19(4):512-518, 1994.
6. Prestero T., Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the remus autonomous underwater vehicle, Master's thesis, MIT/WHOI Joint Program in Applied Ocean Science and Engineering, 2001.
7. Smallwood D. A., Whitcomb L. L., Toward model based trajectory tracking of underwater robotic vehicles: Theory and simulation, 12th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, Durham, New Hampshire, USA, 2001.
8. McLain T. W., Rock S. M., Experiments in the hydrodynamic modeling of an underwater manipulator, Proceedings AUV '96, Monterey, CA, 1996.
9. Caccia M., Indiveri G., Veruggio G., Modeling and identification ofopen-frame variable configuration underwater vehicles, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 25:227-240, 2000.
10. Fossen T. I., Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, 2nd edn., John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York, 1994.
11. Goheen K. R., Modeling methods for underwater robotic vehicle dynamics, J. Robotic Syst. 8(3):295-317, 1991.
12. Goodman A., Experimental techniques and methods of analysis used in submerged body Research, Third Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Scheveningen, 1960.
13. Williams C. D., Mackay M., Perron C., Muselet C., The NRC-IMD marine dynamic test facility: A six-degree-of-freedom forced-motion test apparatus for underwater vehicle testing, International UUV Symposium, Newport RI, 2000.
14. Eng Y. H., Identification of hydrodynamic terms for underwater robotic vehicle, Master First Year Report, NTU, Robotic Research Center, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 2007.
15. Eng Y. H., Lau W. S., Low E., Seet G. L., Chin C. S., Estimation of the hydrodynamic coefficients of an ROV using free decay pendulum motion, Eng. Lett. 16(3):326-331, 2008.
16. Chin C. S., Lau M. W. S., Low. E., Supervisory cascaded controllers design: Experiment test on a remotely-operated vehicle, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 225(3):584-603, 2011.
17. Ferziger J. H., Peric M., Computational Method for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, pp. 28-50, 2002.
18. Sarkar T., Sayer P. G., Fraser S. M., A study of autonomous underwater vehicle hull forms using computational fluid dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Met. Fluids 25(11):1301-1313, 1997.
19. Tyagi A., Sen D., Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach, Ocean Eng. 33(5):798-809, 2006. (Pubitemid 43079137)
20. Wilson R., Paterson E., Stern F., Unsteady RANS CFD method for naval combatant in waves, Proceedings of the 22nd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington DC, National Academy Press, pp. 532-549, 2006.
21. Cheng P. L., LauM., Low E., Seet G., Modeling of a thruster for an underwater robotic vehicle, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST'99), Autonomous Undersea Systems Institute, New Hampshire, pp. 455-466, 1999.
22. The VROV Simulator, http://www.grisim.com/products.html.
23. AUVSim Simulator, http://www.hscientific.com/images/pdf/flyerus-auvsim. pdf# zoom=100.
24. SubSim Software, http://robotics.ee.uwa.edu.au/auv/subsim/doc/About.html.
25. MSS, Marine Systems Simulator (2010), Viewed 26.06.2011, http://www.marinecontrol. org.
26. Chin C. S., Lau M. W. S., Low E., Seet G. G., Software for modelling and simulation of a remotely operated vehicle, Int. J. Simulat. Model. 5(3):114-125, 2006. (Pubitemid 44580165)
27. Conte G., Zanoli S. M., Scaradozzi D., Conti A., Evaluation of hydrodynamics parameters of a UUV, A preliminary study, Int. Symposium on Control, Communications and Signal Processing, ISCCSP, Hammamet, 2004.
28. David A., Smallwood D. A., Whitcomb L. L., Preliminary experiments in the adaptive identification of dynamically positioned underwater robotic vehicles, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1803-1810, 2001. (Pubitemid 34683907)
29. Astr̈om K. J., Ḧagglund T., PID controllers: Theory, design, and tuning, Research Triangle Park, NC, Instrum. Soc. Amer., 1995.