Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing?

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 235-257

  Murphy, Kristina ^a   Cherney, Adrian ^b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

cooperation; ethnicity; identity; police legitimacy; procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355136104     PISSN: 00048658     EISSN: 18379273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0004865811405260     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aiken L,West SMultiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991:.
2. Black J.Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes.Regulation and Governance. 2008;2:137-164.
3. Braithwaite V,Murphy K,Reinhart M.Taxation threat, motivational postures, and responsive regulation.Law and Policy. 2007;29:137-158.
4. Braithwaite VDefiance in Taxation and Governance: Resisting and Dismissing Authority in a Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010:.
5. Brandl SG,Frank J,Worden RE,Bynum TS.Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship.Justice Quarterly. 1994;11:119-134.
6. Brunson RK,Miller J.Young black men and urban policing in the United States.British Journal of Criminology. 2006;46:613-640.
7. Chan JChanging Police Culture: Policing in a Multicultural Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:.
8. Cherney A,Chui WH. Policing ethnically and culturally diverse communities. In: Broadhurst R and Davies S (eds), Policing in Context: An Introduction to Police Work in Australia. Broadhurst RDavies S, ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2008:.
9. Cherney A,Chui WH.Police auxiliaries in Australia: police liaison officers and the dilemmas of being part of the police extended family.Policing and Society. 2010;20:280-297.
10. Cherney A and Murphy K (forthcoming) Understanding the contingency of procedural justice outcomes. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.
11. DeCremer D.Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28:1335-1341.
12. Dixon D,Maher L.Anh hai: Policing, culture and social exclusion in a street heroin market.Policing and Society. 2002;12:93-110.
13. Engel R.Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2005;42:445-481.
14. Folger R.Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of 'voice' and improvement on experienced inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977;35:108-199.
15. Gallagher C,Maguire E,Mastrofski S,Reisig MThe public image of police: Final report to the International Association of Chiefs of Police. 2001:.
16. Gleason P.Confusion compounded - melting pot in the 1960s and 1970s.Ethnicity. 1979;6:10-20.
17. Goodman-Delahunty J.Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing.Policing. 2010;:.
18. Greenwald AG,Banaji MR.Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological Review 102. 1995;1):4-27.
19. Hage GWhite Nation: Fantasies of White Supremacy in a Multicultural Society. Annandale, NSW: Pluto Press; 1998:.
20. Hamilton DLCognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1981:.
21. Hawdon J.Legitimacy, trust, social capital, and policing styles: A theoretical statement.Police Quarterly. 2008;11(2):182-201.
22. Hinds L.Public satisfaction with police: The influence of general attitudes and police-citizen encounters.International Journal of Police Science and Management. 2009;11:54-66.
23. Hinds L,Murphy K.Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2007;40:27-42.
24. Hirschman C.America's melting pot reconsidered.Annual Review of Sociology. 1983;9:397-423.
25. Huo YJ.Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance?.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;29:336-348.
26. Huo YJ,Smith HJ,Tyler TR,Lind EA.Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; Is assimilation the answer?.Psychological Science. 1996;7:40-45.
27. Huo YJ,Tyler TR. Ethnic diversity and the viability of organizations: The role of procedural justice in bridging differences. In: Greenberg J and Cropanzano R (eds), Advances in organizational justice. Greenberg JCropanzano R, ed. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 2001:.
28. Innes M.Policing uncertainty: Countering terror through community intelligence and democratic policing.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2006;605:222-241.
29. Jackson J,Sunshine J.Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkeimain perspective.British Journal of Criminology. 2007;47:214-233.
30. Lind EA,Tyler TRThe Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press; 1988:.
31. MacCoun RJ.Voice, control and belonging: The double-edged sword of procedural fairness.Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2005;1:171-201.
32. Meredyth D,McKernan H,Evans R.Police and Vietnamese-Australian communities in multi-ethnic Melbourne.Policing. 2010;4 (3): 233-240.
33. Modood TMulticulturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007:.
34. Murphy K.Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy and tax non-compliance.Journal of Law and Society. 2005;32:562-589.
35. Murphy K.Public satisfaction with police: The importance of procedural justice and police performance in police-citizen encounters.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2009;42:159-178.
36. Murphy K,Cherney A. Understanding minority group willingness to cooperate with police: Taking another look at legitimacy research. Alfred Deakin Research Institute Working Paper No 15. Geelong: Deakin University; 2010:.
37. Murphy K,Hinds L,Fleming J.Encouraging public cooperation and support for police.Policing and Society. 2008;18:136-155.
38. Murphy K,Tyler TR,Curtis A.Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?.Regulation and Governance. 2009;3:1-26.
39. NSWPLC (New South Wales Parliament Legislative Council) (2001) Report on Inquiry into Cabramatta Policing. New South Wales: General Purpose Standing Committee No. 3, New South Wales Parliament Legislative Council.
40. Paternoster R,Bachman R,Brame R,Sherman LW.Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault.Law and Society Review. 1997;31:163-204.
41. Pickering S,McCulloch J,Wright-Neville DCounter-Terrorism Policing: Community, Cohesion and Security. New York: Springer; 2008:.
42. Platow MJ,Brewer G,Eggins RA.Authorities' knowledge of shared group membership and its effects on the respect-informing properties of procedural fairness.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2008;44:743-750.
43. Reisig M,Bratton J,Gertz M.The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures.Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007;34:1005-1028.
44. Reisig M,Parks R.Experience, quality of life and neighbourhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police.Justice Quarterly. 2000;17:607-630.
45. Max Weber: Economy and Society. Roth GWittich C, ed. 1978:.
46. Sampson R,Bartusch D.Legal cynicism (and subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences.Law and Society Revie. 1998;32:777-804.
47. Sherman LW.Trust and confidence in the criminal justice system.National Institute of Justice Journal. 2001;248:23-31.
48. Sivasubramaniam D,Goodman-Delahunty J.Ethnicity and trust: Perceptions of police bias.International Journal of Police Science and Management. 2008;10:388-440.
49. Skogan W.Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police.Policing and Society. 2006;16:99-126.
50. Sunshine J,Tyler TR.The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing.Law and Society Review. 2003;37:513-547.
51. Turner JC.Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2005;35:1-22.
52. Tyler TR.The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57:830-838.
53. Tyler TR.Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation.Annual Review of Psychology. 2006a;57:375-400.
54. Tyler TRWhy People Obey the Law. 2006b) Why People Obey the Law2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2006b:.
55. Tyler TR,Boekmann R,Smith H,Huo JSocial Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder: Westview Press; 1997:.
56. Tyler TR,DeGoey P.Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;69:482-497.
57. Tyler TR,Fagan J.Legitimacy and cooperation: Why people help the police fight crime in their communities. 2006;:.
58. Tyler TR,Huo YJTrust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2002:.
59. Tyler TR,Lind EA, A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna M (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Zanna M, ed. New York: Academic Press; 1992:115-191.
60. Tyler TR,Schulhofer S,Huq A.Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counter terrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans.Law and Society Review. 2010;44:365-402.
61. Verkuyten M. Multiculturalism and tolerance: An intergroup perspective. In: Crisp R (ed.), The Psychology of Social and Cultural Diversity. Crisp R, ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2010:147-170.
62. Wenzel M.The multiplicity of taxpayer identities and their implications for tax ethics.Law and Policy. 2007;29:31-50.