Encouraging public cooperation and support for police

Policing and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 136-155

  Murphy, Kristina ^a   Hinds, Lyn ^a   Fleming, Jenny ^b,c  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Legitimacy; Policing; Procedural justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068272165     PISSN: 10439463     EISSN: 14772728     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10439460802008660     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Braithwaite, J., and Makkai, T., 1994. Trust and compliance. Policing and Society, 4: 1-12.
2. Edwards, C., 2005. Changing policing theories for 21st century societies, 2nd ed, Leichhardt, Australia: Federation Press.
3. Engel, R.S., 2003. Explaining suspects’ resistance and disrespect toward police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31: 475-492.
4. Lind, E.A., and Tyler, T.R., 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
5. Mastrofski, S.D., Snipes, J.B., and Supina, A.E., 1996. Compliance on demand: the public's response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33 (3): 269-305.
6. McCluskey, J.D., 2003. Police requests for compliance: coercive and procedurally just tactics, New York, NY: LFB Scholarly.
7. McCluskey, J.D., Mastrofski, S.D., and Parks, R.B., 1999. To acquiesce or rebel: predicting citizen compliance with police requests. Police Quarterly, 2 (4): 389-416.
8. Meares, T.L., 1998. Social organisation and drug law enforcement. American Criminal Law Review, 35 (2): 191-227.
9. Murphy, K., 2003. Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38 (3): 379-408.
10. Murphy, K., 2004. The role of trust in nurturing compliance: a study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28 (2): 187-210.
11. Murphy, K., 2005. Regulating more effectively: the relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society, 32 (4): 562-589.
12. Nagin, D.S., 1998. Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the 21st century. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23: 1-42.
13. Paternoster, R., 1997. Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Society Review, 31: 163-204.
14. Piquero, A.R. 2006. Developmental trajectories of legal socialisation among serious adolescent offenders. Criminology, 96 (1): 267-298.
15. Skogan, W.G., and Frydl, K., 2004. Fairness and effectiveness in policing: the evidence. Washington, DC: Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, The National Academies Press
16. Sunshine, J., and Tyler, T.R., 2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37 (3): 513-547.
17. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L., 1975. Procedural justice: a psychological analysis, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Thurman, Q., Zhao, J., and Giacomazzi, A., 2001. Community policing in a community era: an introduction and exploration, California: Roxbury.
19. Tyler, T.R., 1990. Why people obey the law, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Tyler, T.R., 1997. The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 (4): 323-345.
21. Tyler, T.R., 2001. “ A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities ”. In The psychology of legitimacy, Edited by: Jost, J., and Major, B., 416-436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Tyler, T.R., 2004. Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Paper presented at the International Institute of the Sociology of law's conference on emotions, crime and justice, 13-14 September 2004, Onati, Spain.
23. Tyler, T.R., Casper, J.D., and Fisher, B., 1989. Maintaining allegiance toward political authorities. American Journal of Political Science, 33: 629-652.
24. Tyler, T.R., and Darley, J.M., 2000. Building a law-abiding society: taking public views about morality and the legitimacy of legal authorities into account when formulating substantive law. Hofstra Law Review, 28: 707-739.
25. Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P., 1996. “ Trust in organizational authorities: the influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions ”. In Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research, Edited by: Kramer, R.M., and Tyler, T.R., 331-356. London: Sage.
26. Tyler, T.R., and Huo, Y.J., 2002. Trust in the law: encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts, New York, NY: Russell Sage.
27. Tyler, T.R., and Lind, E.A., 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 115-191.
28. Tyler, T.R., and Smith, H., 1998. “ Social justice and social movements ”. In Handbook of social psychology 4th edition, Edited by: Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., and Lindzey, G., 595-629. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29. Weber, M., 1968. Economy and society, Edited by: Roth, G., and Wittich, C., New York, NY: Bedminster.
30. Wissler, R.L., 1995. Meditation and adjudication in the small claims court: the effects of process and case characteristics. Law and Society Review, 29: 323-358.