When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-22

  Park, Haemin Dennis ^a   Steensma, H Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

complementary assets; corporate venture capital; new venture performance; technology entrepreneurship; transaction costs

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS; CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL; NEW VENTURES; TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP; TRANSACTION COST;

COMMERCE;

INVESTMENTS;

EID: 81055140603     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.937     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aghion P, Tirole J,. 1994. The management of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 1185-1209.
2. Ai C, Norton EC,. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters 80: 123-129. (Pubitemid 36598410)
3. Armour HO, Teece DJ,. 1978. Organizational structure and economic performance: a test of multidivisional hypothesis. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 106-122.
4. Baldwin CY, Clark KB,. 2000. Design Rules (Volume 1): The Power of Modularity. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
5. Benson D, Ziedonis RH,. 2008. Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organization Science 20: 329-351.
6. Chesbrough HW,. 2002. Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harvard Business Review 80 (3): 90-99.
7. David P, O'Brien JP, Yoshikawa T,. 2008. The implications of debt heterogeneity for R&D investment and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal 51: 165-181.
8. David RJ, Han S-K,. 2004. A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal 25 (1): 39-58.
9. Dushnitsky G,. 2006. Corporate venture capital: past evidence and future directions. In Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship (Oxford Handbooks in Business & Management), Casson M, Yeung B, Basu A, Wadeson N, (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; 387-431.
10. Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ,. 2005. When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures Strategic Management Journal 26 (10): 947-965. (Pubitemid 41337833)
11. Dushnitsky G, Shapira Z,. 2010. Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management Journal 31 (9): 990-1017.
12. Dushnitsky G, Shaver M,. 2009. Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: the paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management Journal 30 (10): 1045-1064.
13. Folta TB,. 1998. Governance and uncertainty: the tradeoff between administrative control and commitment. Strategic Management Journal 19 (11): 1007-1028. (Pubitemid 128469359)
14. Gaba V, Meyer AD,. 2008. Crossing the organizational species barrier: how venture capital practices infiltrated the information technology sector. Academy of Management Journal 51: 976-998.
15. Gans JS, Hsu D, Stern S,. 2002. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction RAND Journal of Economics 33: 571-586. (Pubitemid 36208909)
16. Geyskens I, Steenkamp J, Kumar N,. 2006. Make, buy, or ally: a transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 22: 519-543. (Pubitemid 43999080)
17. Ghosal SP, Moran P,. 1996. Bad for practice: a critique of transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review 21: 13-47.
18. Gompers PA, Lerner J,. 1998. The determinants of corporate venture capital success: organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. NBER working paper #6725. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
19. Gorman M, Sahlman WA,. 1989. What do venture capitalists do Journal of Business Venturing 4: 231-248.
20. Greene WH,. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
21. Grossman SJ, Hart OD,. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical integration. Journal of Political Economy 94: 691-719.
22. Hart O, Moore J,. 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1119-1150.
23. Hellmann T,. 2002. A theory of strategic venture investing. Journal of Financial Economics 64: 285-314.
24. Hellmann T, Puri M,. 2000. The interaction between product market and financing strategy: the role of venture capital. Review of Financial Studies 13: 959-984. (Pubitemid 33233249)
25. Hellmann T, Puri M,. 2002. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 57: 169-197. (Pubitemid 36931760)
26. Henderson R, Clark K,. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9-30.
27. Hill CWL,. 1990. Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand implications for transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review 15: 500-513.
28. Hochberg YA, Ljungqvist Y, Lu Y,. 2007. Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance 62: 251-301.
29. Hoetker G,. 2007. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal 28 (4): 331-343. (Pubitemid 46463879)
30. Hsu DH,. 2004. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation Journal of Finance 59: 1805-1844. (Pubitemid 39137809)
31. Hsu DH,. 2006. Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Science 52: 206-219.
32. Ivanov VI, Xie F,. 2010. Do corporate venture capitalists add value to start-up firms Evidence from IPOs and acquisitions of VC-backed companies. Financial Management 39: 129-152.
33. Kann A,. 2000. Strategic venture capital investing by corporations: a framework for structuring and valuing corporate venture capital programs. Ph.D. diss. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
34. Kaplan SN, Strömberg P,. 2003. Financial contracting theory meets the real world: an empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies 78: 281-315. (Pubitemid 36647258)
35. Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM,. 2008. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 295-332.
36. Keats BW, Hitt MA,. 1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro-organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 31: 570-598.
37. Keil T, Zahra SA, Maula M,. 2004. Explorative and exploitative learning from corporate venture capital: a model of program level determinants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
38. Kerlinger F,. 1986. Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd edn). Holt, Rinehart, & Winston: New York.
39. Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Dalsace F,. 2002. Do make or buy decisions matter The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (9): 817-833. (Pubitemid 34964370)
40. McNally K,. 1997. Corporate Venture Capital: Bridging the Equity Gap in the Small Business Sector. Routledge: London, UK.
41. Monteverde K,. 1995. Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry. Management Science 41 (10): 1624-1638.
42. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W,. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models (4th edn). Irwin: Chicago, IL.
43. Nickerson JA, Silverman BS,. 2003. Why firms want to organize differently and what keeps them from doing so: inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 433-465.
44. Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C,. 2004. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. STATA Journal 4 (2): 154-167.
45. Pisano GP,. 1990. The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 153-176.
46. Rothaermel FT, Hill CWL,. 2005. Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: a longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organization Science 16: 52-70. (Pubitemid 40366613)
47. Sahaym A, Steensma HK, Schilling MA,. 2007. The influence of information technology on the use of loosely coupled organizational forms: an industry-level analysis. Organization Science 18: 865-880.
48. Sahlman WA,. 1990. The structure and governance of venture capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 473-521.
49. Sampson RC,. 2004. The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 2: 484-526. (Pubitemid 39234248)
50. Sanchez R, Mahoney JT,. 1996. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 63-76.
51. Schilling M, Steensma HK,. 2001. The use of modular organizational forms: an industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal 44: 1149-1169.
52. Shane S, Stuart TE,. 2002. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science 48: 364-381.
53. Siegel R, Siegel E, MacMillan I,. 1988. Corporate venture capitalists: autonomy, obstacles, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing 3: 233-247.
54. SÃrenson M,. 2007. How smart is smart money A two-sided matching model of venture capital. Journal of Finance 62: 2725-2762.
55. Sorenson O, Stuart TE,. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology 106: 1546-1588.
56. Spivak S, Brenner FC,. 2001. Standardization Essentials: Principles and Practice. Marcel Dekker: New York.
57. Stuart T, Hoang H, Hybels RC,. 1999. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 315-349.
58. Suarez F,. 2005. Network effects revisited: the role of strong ties in technology selection. Academy of Management Journal 48: 710-720. (Pubitemid 41322618)
59. Teece DJ,. 1980. The diffusion of an administrative innovation. Management Science 26: 464-470.
60. Teece DJ,. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaborating, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285-305.
61. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A,. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509-533. (Pubitemid 127467809)
62. Tripsas M,. 1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18: 119-142. (Pubitemid 127697934)
63. Wadhwa A, Kotha S,. 2006. Exploration and knowledge creation through external venturing: evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal 49: 819-835. (Pubitemid 44453121)
64. Waguespack D, Fleming L,. 2009. Scanning the commons Evidence on the benefits to startups participating in open standards development. Management Science 55 (2): 210-223.
65. Weick KE,. 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1-19.
66. Williamson OE,. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York.
67. Williamson OE,. 1988. Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance 43: 567-591.
68. Williamson OE,. 1991. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269-296.
69. Winters TE, Murfin DE,. 1988. Venture capital investing for corporate development objectives. Journal of Business Venturing 3 (3): 207-222.
70. Wooldridge JM,. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.