Prosodic cues to engagement in non-lexical response tokens in Swedish

DiSS-LPSS Joint Workshop 2010 - The 5th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech and the 2nd International Symposium on Linguistic Patterns in Spontaneous Speech

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 63-66

  Gustafson, Joakim ^a   Neiberg, Daniel ^a  

^a KTH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

listener responses; prosodic alignment; prosodic cues; turn management

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER CARE; LANGUAGE LEARNING; LISTENER RESPONSE; PROSODIC ALIGNMENT; PROSODIC CUE; PROSODICS; SECOND LANGUAGE; SWEDISHS; TURN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 80955181920     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 567-578). Chicago.
2. Fujimoto, D. (2007). Listener Responses in Interaction: A Case for Abandoning the Term, Backchannel. Journal of Osaka Jogakuin 2year College, 37, 35-54.
3. Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
4. Cathcart, N., Carletta, J., & Klein, E. (2003). A shallow model of backchannel continuers in spoken dialogue. In 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Budapest.
5. Ward, N. (1998). The Relationship between Sound and Meaning in Japanese Back-channel Grunts. In 4th Meeting of the (Japanese) Association for Natural Language Processing.
6. Pammi, S., & Schröder, M. (2009). Annotating meaning of listener vocalizations for speech synthesis. In International Conference on Affective Computing & Intelligent Interaction.. Amsterdam.
7. Allwood, J. (1995). An activity based approach to pragmatics. In Bunt, H., & Black, B. (Eds.), Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics (pp. 47-80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Benus, S., Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2007). The prosody of backchannels in American English. In Proceedings of ICPhS XVI (pp. 1065-1068). Saarbrücken, Germany.
9. Allen, J. F., Ferguson, G., & Stent, A. (2001). An architecture for more realistic conversational systems. In Proceedings of IUI-0, 1-8. Santa Fe, NM, US.
10. Edlund, J., Gustafson, J., Heldner, M., & Hjalmarsson, A. (2008). Towards human-like spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication, 50(8-9), 630-645.
11. Gustafson, J., Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2008). Potential benefits of human-like dialogue behaviour in the call routing domain. In Proceedings of PIT 2008. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
12. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2001). Interactional prosody: High onsets in reasonfor- the-call turns. In Language in Society (pp. 29– 53).
13. Branigan, H., Pickering, M., Pearson, J., & McLean, J. (2010). Linguistic alignment between humans and computers. In Journal of Pragmatics.