Interactional prosody: High onsets in reason-for-the-call turns

Language in Society

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 29-53

  Couper Kuhlen, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039896064     PISSN: 00474045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0047404501001026     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Auer, Peter, & di Luzio, Aldo (eds.) (1992). The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1983). Intonatorische Kohäsion. Eine makroprosodische Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49:74-100.
3. _ (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London: Edward Arnold; Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
4. _ (1998). Prosody in interactional discourse. In Timo Haukioja, Marja Liisa Helasvuo, & Matti Miestaneo (eds.), SKY: 1998 Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 7-40. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
5. _ (to appear). Intonation and discourse: Current views from within. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, & Heidi Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. New York: Blackwell.
6. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, & Selting, Margret (eds.) (1996a). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. _, _ (1996b). Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen & Selting (eds.) 1996a, 11-56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Du Bois, John W.; Schuetze-Coburn, Stephen; Cumming, Susanna; & Paolino, Danae (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Gumperz, John (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Hutchby, Ian, & Wooffitt, Robin (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Pierrehumbert, Janet, & Hirschberg, Julia (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan, & Martha E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271-311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 23-78. Irvington, NY: Irvington Publishers.
14. _ (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?". Sociological Inquiry 50:104-152.
15. _ (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9:111-151.
16. _ (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech 41:235-263.
17. Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8:289-327.
18. Schuetze-Coburn, Stephen; Shapley, Marian; & Weber, Elizabeth G. (1991). Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech 34:207-234.
19. Selting, Margret; Auer, Peter; et al. (1998). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte 173:91-122.
20. Swerts, Marc, & Hirschberg, Julia (1998). Prosody and conversation: An introduction Language and Speech 41:229-233.