A multilayer evaluation approach for protein structure prediction and model quality assessment

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue SUPPL. 10, 2011, Pages 172-184

  Zhang, Jingfen ^a,b   Wang, Qingguo ^a   Vantasin, Kittinun ^a   Zhang, Jiong ^b   He, Zhiquan ^a,b   Kosztin, Ioan ^b   Shang, Yi ^a   Xu, Dong ^a,b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Consensus quality assessment; MUFOLD; Protein structure prediction; Structural model quality assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HYBRIDIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 80855143800     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23184     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001; 294: 93-96.
2. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993; 234: 779-815.
3. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: W526-W531.
4. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick J. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins 2005; 61(Suppl 7): 91-98.
5. Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: W244-W248.
6. Floudas CA. Computational methods in protein structure prediction. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007; 97: 207-213.
7. Kihara D, Chen H, Yang YD. Quality assessment of protein structure models. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2009; 10: 216-228.
8. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 1999; 288: 477-487.
9. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990; 112: 6127-6129.
10. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001; 44: 223-232.
11. Wu Y, Lu M, Chen M, Li J, Ma J. OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions. Protein Sci 2007; 16: 1449-1463.
12. Lu M, Dousis AD, Ma J. OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. J Mol Biol 2008; 376: 288-301.
13. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2714-2726.
14. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998; 275: 895-916.
15. Wang Z, Tegge AN, Cheng J. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines. Proteins 2009; 75: 638-647.
16. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 11158-11162.
17. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 865-871.
18. Gront D, Hansmann UH, Kolinski A. Exploring protein energy landscapes with hierarchical clustering. Int J Quantum Chem 2005; 105: 826-830.
19. Cheng J, Wang Z, Tegge AN, Eickholt J. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 181-184.
20. Larsson P, Skwark MJ, Wallner B, Elofsson A. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 167-172.
21. Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schwede T. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 173-180.
22. Wang Q, Shang Y, Xu D, editors. Protein structure selection based on consensus. In: 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), July 18-23, 2010.
23. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 157-166.
24. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Tramontano A. Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011. 79 (Suppl 10): 91-106.
25. Zhang J, Wang Q, Barz B, He Z, Kosztin I, Shang Y, Xu D. MUFOLD: a new solution for protein 3D structure prediction. Proteins 2010; 78: 1137-1152.
26. Wallner B, Elofsson A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 2005; 14: 1315-1327.
27. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389-3402.
28. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 951-960.
29. Xu Y, Xu D. Protein threading using PROSPECT: design and evaluation. Proteins 2000; 40: 343-354.
30. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3370-3374.
31. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403-410.
32. Holland PW, Leinhardt S. Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Small Group Res 1971; 2: 107-124.
33. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of /'small-world/' networks. Nature 1998; 393: 440-442.
34. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973; 181: 223-230.
35. Brooks BR, Brooks CL, III, Mackerell AD, Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009; 30: 1545-1614.
36. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004; 57: 702-710.
37. McGuffin LJ, Roche DB. Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: 182-188.
38. Ben-David M, Noivirt-Brik O, Paz A, Prilusky J, Sussman JL, Levy Y. Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2009; 77(Suppl 9): 50-65.
39. Shen MY, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 2507-2524.
40. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998; 275: 895-916.
41. Benkert P, Schwede T, Tosatto SC. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information. BMC Struct Biol 2009; 9: 35.
42. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000; 16: 776-785.
43. Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J. Fast procedure for reconstruction of full-atom protein models from reduced representations. J Comput Chem 2008; 29: 1460-1465.