Occupational exposure limits in Europe and Asia - Continued divergence or global harmonization?

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 296-309

  Ding, Qian ^a   Schenk, Linda ^a   Malkiewicz, Katarzyna ^a   Hansson, Sven Ove ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ACGIH; Asia; Chemical regulation; Harmonization; Occupational exposure limits; Risk management; The European union

Indexed keywords

TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

ARTICLE; ASIA; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROPE; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ASIA; EUROPE; INTERNATIONALITY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUES;

EID: 80855123617     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Conference on Industrial Hygiene (ACGIH) (2010) 2010, ACGIH, Documentation of the TLVs and BEIs with other worldwide occupational exposure values CD-ROM. ACGIH, Cincinnati, USA.
2. Belgium, 2006. De federale minister van Werk (2006). Koninklijk besluit van 11 maart 2002 betreffende de bescherming van de gezondheid en de veiligheid van de werknemers tegen de risico's van chemische agentia op het werk (B.S. 14.3.2002, Ed.2) BIJLAGE I Grenswaarden voor beroepsmatige blootstelling. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.meta.fgov.be/defaultTab.aspx?id=616.
3. Denmark, 2007. The Danish Working Environment Authority (2007). Grænseværdier for stoffer og materialer At-vejledning C.0.1 (2007). Rettelsesblad, marts 2008. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.at.dk/Vejledninger/C-0-1?sc_lang=da.
4. EU, 1991. Commission Directive 91/322/EEC of 29 May 1991 on establishing indicative limit values by implementing Council Directive 80/1107/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work.
5. EU, 1996. Commission Directive 96/94/EC of 18 December 1996 establishing a second list of indicative limit values in implementation of Council Directive 80/1107/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work.
6. EU, 1998. Council Directive 98/24/EC of 7 April 1998 on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work (fourteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC).
7. EU, 2000. Commission Directive 2000/39/EC of 8 June 2000 establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work.
8. EU, 2003. Directive 2003/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 March 2003 amending Council Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work (text with EEA relevance).
9. EU, 2004. Directive 2004/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens or mutagens at work (Sixth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC).
10. EU, 2006. Commission Directive 2006/15/EC of 7 February 2006 establishing a second list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC and amending Directives 91/322/EEC and 2000/39/EC.
11. EU, 2009. COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2009/161/EU of 17 December 2009 establishing a third list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC and amending Commission Directive 2000/39/EC.
12. Finland, 2009. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet (2009). HTP-värden 2009, Koncentrationer som befunnits skadliga (2009). Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.stm.fi/sv/publikationer/publikation/_julkaisu/1421516.
13. France, 2007. L'Institut national de recherche et de sécurité (INRS) (2007). Valeurs limites d'exposition professionnelle aux agents chimiques en France (2007). Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.inrs.fr.
14. Germany, 2009a. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (2009). List of MAK and BAT Values 2009. Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area Report No. 45.
15. Germany, 2009b. Ausschuss für Gefahrstoffe (AGS) (2009). Die Technischen Regeln für Gefahrstoffe-900. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.baua.de/cln_135/en/Homepage.html.
16. Iceland, 2009. The Administration of Occupational Safety and Healthin Iceland (AOSH) (2009). REGLUGER{Eth} um mengunarmörk og a{eth}ger{eth}ir til a{eth} draga úr mengun á vinnustö{eth}um. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.stjornartidindi.is.
17. Ireland, 2010. Health and Safety Authority(HSA) (2010). 2010 Code of Practice - for the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Chemical Agents) Regulations 2001. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.hsa.ie.
18. Luxembourg, 2002. RECUEIL DE LEGISLATION A-N° 96 (2002). Règlement grand-ducal du 30 juillet 2002 concernant la protection de la santé et de la sécurité des travailleurs contre les risques liés à des agents chimiques sur le lieu de travail. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.legilux.public.lu/leg/a/archives/2002/0096/a096.pdf.
19. The Netherlands, 2006, 2008. Ministry of Social Affairs (2006) (2008). Staatscourant 28 December 2006 nr. 252, Staatscourant January 2008, nr. 1, Staatscourant 22 April 2008, nr. 78. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.ser.nl/en/oel_database/newsroom/introduction_newoels.aspx.
20. Norway, 2009. The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority (2009). Liste over administrative normer. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/artikkel.html?tid=78880#19.
21. OECD 2005. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/6/34711139.pdf.
22. Poland, 2010. The Interdepartmental Commission for Maximum Admissible Concentrations and Intensities for Agents Harmful to Health in the Working Environment (2010). The Ordinance of the Minister of Labour and Social Policy on the maximum admissible concentrations and intensities of harmful to health agents in the working environment. DZIENNIK USTAW 2010, NO 141, ITEM 950.
23. Spain, 2010. El Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo (INSHT) (2010). LíMITES DE EXPOSICIóN PROFESIONAL PARA AGENTES QUíMICOS EN ESPAñA (2010). Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.insht.es.
24. Sweden, 2005. the Swedish Work Environment Authority (2005). Statute Book of the Swedish Work Environment Authority (AFS 2005:17) Occupational Exposure Limits for Airborne Toxic Substances. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.av.se/dokument/afs/AFS2005_17.pdf.
25. Switzerland, 2009. The Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (SUVA), 2009. Grenzwerte am Arbeitsplatz 2009. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.sapros.ch/images/supplier/220/pdf/01903_d.pdf.
26. UK, 2007. Health and Safety Commission (HSC) (2007). EH40/2005 Workplace Exposure Limits. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.hse.gov.uk/coshh/1.pdf.
27. China, 2007. Ministry of Health (2007). Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace (GBZ 2.1-2007) (in Chinese). Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.moh.gov.cn.
28. Hongkong, 1998. The occupational Hygiene Division of Labor Department (1998). A Reference Note on Occupational Exposure Limits for Chemical Substances in the Work Environment. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.labour.gov.hk/eng/public/oh/OEL%20Reference%20Note%20E%202000.pdf.
29. India, 2007. The Central Government (2007). Section 41-F of Factories Act, 1948: Permissible limits of exposure of chemicals and toxic substances. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.dgfasli.nic.in/html/factyact/csch2.htm.
30. JSOH, 2010. The Japan Society for Occupational Health (2005). Recommendation of Occupational Exposure Limits (2005-2006). Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.joh.med.uoeh-u.ac.jp/oel/index.html.
31. Malaysia, 2000. The Department of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) (2000). The Occupational Safety and Health (Use and Standards of Exposure of Chemicals Hazardous to Health) Regulations 2000. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.miosh.net/articles/?_page=6.
32. Singapore, 2004. Minister of Manpower (2004). The Factories (Permissible Exposure Levels of Toxic Substances) Notification 2004. Republic of Singapore Government Gazette.
33. Taiwan, 2009. the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) (2009). Standards of Permissible Exposure Limits of Airborne Hazardous Substances in Workplace. Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.laws.cla.gov.tw/eng/EngContent.asp?msgid=55.
34. South Korea, 2008. Ministry of Labor (2008). Exposure Limits for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents in Korea. Available from: (accessed 20.12.2009). http://www.webhard.co.kr.
35. Castleman B.I., Ziem G.E. Corporate influence on threshold limit values. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1988, 13:531-559.
36. CIRS, 2010. Chemical Inspection and Regulation Service (CIRS) Available from: (accessed 02.05.2011). http://www.reach123.cn.
37. Gromiec J. Problems concerning the integration of " derived-no-effect-levels" (DNEL) into occupational safety and health regulations. Medycyna Pracy. 2008, 59:65-73.
38. Hansson S.O. Setting the limit. Occupational health standards and the limits of science 1998, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
39. Hansson S.O. A case study of pseudo-science in occupational medicine. New Solutions 1998, 8:175-189.
40. Jeong J.Y., Choi S., Kho Y.L., Kim P.G. Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2010, 58:345-348.
41. Kim Y., Jeong K.S., Yun Y., Oh M. Occupational neurologic disorders in Korea. Journal of Clinical Neurology 2010, 6:64-72.
42. Liang Y.X., Wong O., Yang L., Li T., Su Z. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006, 46:107-113.
43. Nielsen G.D., Øvrebø S. Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: A minireview. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2008, 51:253-269.
44. Piney M. Exposure limits and health risks arguments for a paradigm shift. The politics of chemical risk. scenarios for a regulatory future 1998, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. R. Bal, W. Halffman (Eds.).
45. Rampal K.G., Nizam J.M. Developing regulations for occupational exposures to health hazards in Malaysia. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006, 46:131-135.
46. Rappaport S.M. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility-the bases for exposure limits in the United-States. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1993, 23:683-694.
47. Roach S.A., Rappaport S.M. But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of threshold limit values. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1990, 17:727-753.
48. Rudén C. The use and evaluation of primary data in 29 trichloroethylene carcinogen risk assessments. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2001, 34:3-16.
49. Rudén C. Scrutinizing ACGIH risk assessments: The trichloroethylene case. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2003, 44:207-213.
50. Schenk L. Comparison of data used for setting occupational exposure limits. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 2010, 16:249-262.
51. Schenk L., Hansson S.O., Rudén C., Gilek M. Are occupational exposure limits becoming more alike within the European Union?. Journal of Applied Toxicology 2008, 28:858-866.
52. Schenk L., Hansson S.O., Rudén C., Gilek M. Occupational exposure limits: A comparative study. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2008, 50:261-270.
53. Schenk, L., Johanson, G., 2011. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the European indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH. Forthcoming in Toxicological Sciences.
54. Shih T.S., Wu K.Y., Chen H.I., Chang C.P., Chang H.Y., Huang Y.S., Liou S.H. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Taiwan. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006, 46:142-148.
55. Takahashi K., Higashi T. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Japan. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006, 46:120-125.
56. Tang T.K., Siang L.H., Koh D. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Singapore. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006, 46:136-141.
57. Todd L.A., Mottus K., Mihlan G.J. A survey of airborne and skin exposures to chemicals in footwear and equipment factories in Thailand. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2008, 5:169-181.
58. Walters D., Grodzki K. Beyond limits? dealing with chemical risks at work in Europe 2006, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK.
59. Wong O. Regulation of occupational exposures in China. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2003, 38:109-111.
60. Wong O. Editorial: The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Asia. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006, 46:105-106.