External cueing improves motor imagery quality in patients with Parkinson disease

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-35

  Heremans, Elke ^a   Nieuwboer, Alice ^a   Feys, Peter ^a,b,c   Vercruysse, Sarah ^a   Vandenberghe, Wim ^a,d   Sharma, Nikhil ^e   Helsen, Werner F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b PHL University College   (Belgium)

^c HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

Author keywords

cueing; mental practice; motor imagery; Parkinson disease; rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRADYKINESIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGERY; MALE; MOTOR IMAGERY; PARKINSON DISEASE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CUES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMANS; HYPOKINESIA; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARKINSON DISEASE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 80755148393     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968311411055     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke?. Stroke. 2006 ; 37: 1941-1952 (Pubitemid 44297755)
2. Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Schuster C, Puhan MA, Siekierka E, Steurer J. Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008 ; 5: 8
3. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol.. 2009 ; 8: 741-754
4. Dominey P, Decety J, Broussolle E, Chazot G, Jeannerod M. Motor imagery of a lateralized sequential task is asymmetrically slowed in hemi-Parkinson's patients. Neuropsychologia. 1995 ; 33: 727-741
5. Frak V, Cohen H, Pourcher E. A dissociation between real and simulated movements in Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport. 2004 ; 15: 1489-1492 (Pubitemid 38925249)
6. Yagüez L, Canavan AGM, Lange HW, Hömberg V. Motor learning by imagery is differentially affected in Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases. Behav Brain Res. 1999 ; 102: 115-127 (Pubitemid 29314573)
7. Helmich RC, de Lange FP, Bloem BR, Toni I. Cerebral compensation during motor imagery in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 2007 ; 45: 2201-2215 (Pubitemid 46678107)
8. Heremans E, Feys P, Nieuwboer A, et al. Motor imagery ability in patients with early- and mid-stage Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25: 168-177
9. Louis M, Guillot A, Maton S, Doyon J, Collet C. Effect of imagined movement speed on subsequent motor performance. J Mot Behav. 2008 ; 40: 117-132 (Pubitemid 351466368)
10. Jeannerod M The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Wiley-Blackwell: Cambridge, England ; 1997
11. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Skour X, Schieppati M. Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing tasks. Behav Brain Res. 2002 ; 134: 209-215 (Pubitemid 34912700)
12. Decety J, Michel F. Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain Cogn. 1989 ; 11: 87-97
13. Guillot A, Collet C. Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. Mot Behav. 2005 ; 37: 10-20 (Pubitemid 40041430)
14. Jenny O, Hall CR. Image speed: quantitative analysis of athletes' voluntary use of slow motion, real time, and fast motion images. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2009 ; 21: 15-30
15. Reed CL. Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Mem Cognit. 2002 ; 30: 1169-1178 (Pubitemid 36313870)
16. Tamir R, Dickstein R, Huberman M. Integration of motor imagery and physical practice in group treatment applied to subjects with Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 68-75 (Pubitemid 44926974)
17. Dickstein R, Tamir R The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery. Guillot A Collet C, ed. New-York: Oxford University Press ; 2010: 177-188.
18. Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, Rochester L, et al. Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: The RESCUE-trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 ; 78: 134-140 (Pubitemid 46220208)
19. Rubinstein TC, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The power of cueing to circumvent dopamine deficits: a review of physical therapy treatment of gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease. Mov Dis. 2002 ; 17: 1148-1160 (Pubitemid 36050001)
20. DeLong MR, Wichmann T. Circuits and circuit disorders of the basal ganglia. Arch Neurol. 2007 ; 64: 20-24 (Pubitemid 46072419)
21. Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Swinnen SP. Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Neuroimage. 2003 ; 19: 764-776 (Pubitemid 36918219)
22. Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, et al. Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2005 ; 19: 695-713 (Pubitemid 41489524)
23. Decety J. Analysis of actual and mental movement times in graphic tasks. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 ; 82: 367-372
24. Gentili R, Cahouet V, Ballay Y, Papaxanthis C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav Brain Res. 2004 ; 155: 231-239 (Pubitemid 39208905)
25. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehéricy S, et al. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex. 2000 ; 10: 1093-1104
26. Papaxanthis C, Schieppati M, Gentili R, Pozzo T. Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions and direction of mass. Exp Brain Res. 2002 ; 142: 447-452 (Pubitemid 34253293)
27. Heremans E, Helsen WF, De Poel JH, Alaerts K, Meyns P, Feys P. Facilitation of motor imagery through movement-related cueing. Brain Res. 2009 ; 1278: 50-58
28. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 ; 9: 97-113
29. Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S. Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 1999 ; 56: 33-39 (Pubitemid 29046907)
30. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967 ; 17: 427-442
31. Fahn S, Elton RL Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease. Fahn S Marsden CD Calne DB Goldstein M, ed. Macmillan: Florham Park, NJ ; 1987: 153-163.
32. Dick TPR, Guiloff RJ, Stewart A, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 ; 47: 496-499 (Pubitemid 14145499)
33. Marinus J, Visser M, Verwey NA, et al. Assessment of cognition in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 2003 ; 61: 1222-1228 (Pubitemid 37377541)
34. Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M, et al. International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. The Ataxia Neuropharmacology Committee of the World Federation of Neurology. J Neurol Sci. 1997 ; 145: 205-211 (Pubitemid 27121687)
35. Sharma N, Jones PS, Carpenter TA, Baron JC. Mapping the involvement of BA 4a and 4p during motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2008 ; 41: 92-99
36. Sharma N, Baron JC, Rowe JB. Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol. 2009 ; 66: 604-616
37. Hall CR, Martin KA. Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Ment Imagery. 1997 ; 21: 143-154
38. Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A, Doyon J. Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 330-340 (Pubitemid 351852636)
39. Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res. 1989 ; 34: 35-42 (Pubitemid 19195282)
40. Hall CR, Pongrac J, Buckloz E. The measurement of imagery ability. Hum Mov Sci. 1985 ; 4: 107-118 (Pubitemid 15055217)
41. Atienza F, Balaguer I, Garcia-Merita MA. Factor analysis and reliability of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Percept Mot Skills. 1994 ; 78: 1323-1328
42. Randhawa B, Harris S, Boyd LA. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is a reliable tool for individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010 ; 34: 161-167
43. Heremans E, Helsen WF, Feys P. The eyes as a mirror of our thoughts: Quantification of motor imagery through eye movement registration. Behav Brain Res. 2008 ; 187: 351-360
44. Feys P, Helsen WF, Liu X, et al. Interaction between eye and hand movements in multiple sclerosis patients with intention tremor. Mov Dis. 2005 ; 20: 705-713 (Pubitemid 41051782)
45. Feys P, Helsen W, Buekers M, et al. The effect of changed visual feedback on intention tremor in multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2006 ; 394: 17-21 (Pubitemid 43052966)
46. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 ; 39: 386-391
47. Helsen WF, Elliott D, Starkes J, Ricker KR. Temporal and spatial coupling of point of gaze and hand movements in aiming. J Mot Behav. 1998 ; 30: 249-259 (Pubitemid 28453399)
48. Keppel G Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. 3 rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1991. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ ; 1991
49. Maschke M, Gomez CM, Tuite PJ, Konczak J. Dysfunction of the basal ganglia, but not the cerebellum, impairs kinaesthesia. Brain. 2003 ; 126: 2312-2322 (Pubitemid 37432374)
50. Verschueren SM, Swinnen SP, Dom R, De Weerdt W. Interlimb coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease: motor learning deficits and the importance of augmented information feedback. Exp Brain Res. 1997 ; 113: 497-508 (Pubitemid 27140273)
51. Hovington CL, Brouwer B. Guided motor imagery in healthy adults and stroke: does strategy matter?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 851-857
52. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Müncks L, Swinnen SP. Motor learning in Parkinson's disease: limitations and potential for rehabilitation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 ; 15 (suppl 3). S53 - S58
53. Rochester L, Baker K, Hetherington V, et al. Evidence for motor learning in Parkinson's disease: acquisition, automaticity and retention of cued gait performance after training with external rhythmical cues. Brain Res. 2010 ; 1319: 103-111
54. Ronsse R, Puttemans V, Coxon JP, et al. Motor learning with augmented feedback: modality-dependent behavioral and neural consequences. Cereb Cortex.
55. McKinlay A, Grace RC, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Roger D. Characteristics of executive function impairment in Parkinson's disease patients without dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 ; 16: 268-277
56. Brown RG, Marsden CD. Internal versus external cues and the control of attention in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 1998 ; 11: 323-345
57. Simmons L, Sharma N, Baron JC, Pomeroy VM. Motor imagery to enhance recovery after subcortical stroke: who might benefit, daily dose, and potential effects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 458-467
58. Personnier P, Paizis C, Ballay Y, Papaxanthis C. Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging II: the influence of the gravito-inertial context on the duration of overt and covert arm movements. Behav Brain Res. 2008 ; 186: 273-283 (Pubitemid 350130270)
59. Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen VA, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. Functional neuroanatomical networks associated with expertise in motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2008 ; 41: 1471-1483
60. Lovell G, Collins D. Electroencephalographic differences between high and low mental imagery ability groups when learning a novel motor skill. J Hum Mov Stud. 2002 ; 93: 269-295
61. Goss S, Hall C, Buckolz E, Fishburne G. Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of motor skills. Mem Cognit. 1986 ; 14: 469-477 (Pubitemid 17000200)