Variable and time-lag selection using empirical data

IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Souza, Francisco ^a   Araújo, Rui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; EMPIRICAL DATA; INFORMATION CONTENTS; INPUT SPACE; LEAST SQUARES SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; MULTICOLLINEARITY; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; SEARCH PROCEDURES; SOFT SENSORS; TIME LAG; VARIABLE SELECTION PROBLEMS;

INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

FACTORY AUTOMATION;

EID: 80655143765     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ETFA.2011.6059083     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley Series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing, 1991.
2. M. R. Delgado, E. Y. Nagai, and L. V. R. de Arruda. A neuro-coevolutionary genetic fuzzy system to design soft sensors. Soft Computing, 13(5):481-495, December 2008.
3. L. Fortuna, S. Graziani, and M. G. Xibilia. Soft Sensors for Monitoring and Control of Industrial Processes. Springer, 2007.
4. I. Guyon. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1157-1182, 2003.
5. U. Jeppsson, C. Rosen, J. Alex, J. Copp, K. Gernaey, M. N. Pons, and P. Vanrolleghem. Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of wwtps. Water Science and Technology, 53(1):287-295, 2006.
6. R. Kohavi and G. H. John. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence Archive, 97(1-2):273-324, December 1997. (Pubitemid 127401107)
7. A. Kraskov, H. Stögbauer, and P. Grassberger. Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E, 69(6):066138, June 2004.
8. Ls-svmlab, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/sista/ lssvmlab/ .
9. O. Ludwig, U. Nunes, R. Araújo, L. Schnitman, and H. A. Lepikson. Applications of information theory, genetic algorithms, and neural models to predict oil flow. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14(7):2870-2885, 2009.
10. H. Peng, F. Long, and C. Ding. Feature selection based on mutual information: Criteria of max-dependency, maxrelevance, and minredundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(8):1226-1238, August 2005. (Pubitemid 41245053)
11. M. Shakil, M. Elshafei, M. Habib, and F. Maleki. Soft sensor for nox and o2 using dynamic neural networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 35(4):578-586, 2009.
12. F. Souza, P. Santos, and R. Araújo. Variable and delay selection using neural networks and mutual information for data-driven soft sensors. In Proc. 2010 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 2010), pages 1-8, September 2010.
13. J. A. K. Suykens, T. V. Gestel, J. D. Brabanter, B. D. Moor, and J. Vandewalle. Least Squares Support Vector Machiness. World Scientific, 2002.
14. T. Suzuki, M. Sugiyama, J. Sese, and T. Kanamori. Approximating mutual information by maximum likelihood density ratio estimation. JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 4:5-20, 2008.
15. K. Warne, G. Prasad, S. Rezvani, and L. Maguire. Statistical and computational intelligence techniques for inferential model development: a comparative evaluation and a novel proposition for fusion. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17(8):871-885, 2004.