Quality of human-computer interaction - Results of a national usability survey of hospital-IT in Germany

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Bundschuh, Bettina B ^b   Majeed, Raphael W ^b   Bürkle, Thomas ^a,c   Kuhn, Klaus ^a,d   Sax, Ulrich ^a,e   Seggewies, Christof ^a,f   Vosseler, Cornelia ^a,g   Röhrig, Rainer ^a,b  

^a German Association for Medical Informatics   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^g Vosseler Consulting   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

BENCHMARKING; DATA COLLECTION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; GERMANY; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80655141691     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-69     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Problems, challenges, perspectives. Kuhn KA, Guise DA, Methods Inf Med 2001 40 275 287 11552339 (Pubitemid 32803291)
2. Strategic information management plans: the basis for systematic information management in hospitals. Winter AF, Ammenwerth E, Bott OJ, Brigl B, Int J Med Inform 2001 99 109 (Pubitemid 33089340)
3. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB, Med Care Res Rev 2007 64 650 672 10.1177/1077558707305942 17717378 (Pubitemid 350077318)
4. From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among. Lium JT, Laerum H, Schulz T, Faxvaag A, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 13 668 675 10.1197/jamia.M2108 16929040 (Pubitemid 44648759)
5. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK, Int J Med Inform 2008 77 386 398 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011 17964851 (Pubitemid 351626707)
6. Wahrgenommener Wert von IT in Krankenhäusern-eine empirische Studie. Fähling J, Köbler F, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H, Business Services: Konzepte, Technolgien, Anwendungen 2009 709 718
7. Nielsen J, Usability engineering Cambridge: Academic Press 1993
8. Usability of Electronic Medical Records. Smelcer JB, Miller-Jacobs H, Kantrovich L, Journal of usability studies 2009 70 84
9. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 104 112 14633936 (Pubitemid 38327498)
10. Computerized Physician Order Entry-Wirksamkeit und Effizienz elektronischer Arzneimittelverordnung mit Entscheidungsunterstü tzungssystemen. Stürzlinger H, Hiebinger C, Pertl D, Traurig P, GMS Health Technology Assessment 2009 5
11. Reflections on electronic medical records: when doctors will use them and when they will not. Bleich HL, Slack WV, Int J Med Inform 2010 79 1 4 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.10.002 19939731
12. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information sytems implementation experience in seven countries. Ludwick DA, Doucette J, Int J Med Inform 2009 22 31
13. Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot? Bürkle T, Ammenwerth E, Prokosch HU, Dudeck J, J Eval Clin Pract 2001 7 373 385 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00291.x 11737529 (Pubitemid 33086246)
14. Summative software evaluation of a therapeutic guideline assistance system for empiric antimicrobial therapy in ICU. Röhrig R, Beutefuhr H, Hartmann B, Niczko E, Quinzio B, Junger A, Hempelmann G, J Clin Monit Comput 2007 21 203 210 10.1007/s10877-007-9073-0 17406987 (Pubitemid 47090800)
15. Usability evaluation of a web-based patient information system for individuals. Kuosmanen L, Jakobsson T, Hyttinen J, Koivunen M, Valimaki M, J Adv Nurs 2010 66 2701 2710 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05411.x 20722811
16. Supporting Patient Care by Using Innovative Information Technology. A case Study from Clinical Psychiatry. Ammenwerth E, Ehlers F, Kutscha A, Kutscha U, Eichstadter R, Resch F, Practical Disease Management 2002 10 479 487 (Pubitemid 34876243)
17. Usability evaluation of a computerized physician order entry for medication. Khajouei R, de JD, Jaspers MW, Stud Health Technol Inform 2009 150 532 536 19745368
18. A chronic wound healing information technology system: design, testing and evaluation in clinic. Sánchez A, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 2004 7 57 66
19. A quantitative analysis of the impact of a computerisedinformation system on nurses' clinical pratice using a realistic evaluation framework. Oroviogoicoechea C, Watson R, Int J Med Inform 2009 839 849
20. Design Issues for Socially Intelligent User Interfaces. A Discourse Analysis of a Data-to-text System for Summarizing Clinical Data. McKinlay A, McVittie C, Reiter E, Methods Inf Med 2010 379 387
21. Herczeg M, Software-Ergonomie: Theorien, Modelle und Kriterien für gebrauchstaugliche Computersysteme München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH 3 2009
22. Questionaire Based Usability Evaluation of Hospital Information Systems. Hamborg KC, Vehse B, Bludau HB, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 2004 7 21 30
23. Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting. Reips U, Experimental Psychology 2002 49 243 256 10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243 12455331 (Pubitemid 41310351)
24. Complementary methods of system usability evaluation: Surveys and observations during software design and development cycles. Horsky J, McColgan K, Pang JE, Middelton B, J Biomed Inform 2010 782 790
25. Self-selection bias versus nonresponse bias in the Perceptions of Mobility survey. A comparison using multiple imputation. Oberski D, The Netherlands Institute for Social Research | scp University of Tilburg and esade Barcelona 2008
26. European Committee for Standardization, Ergonomic requirements for office workwith visual display terminals (VTDs): Dialogue principles 1996
27. The Contextual Nature of Usability and its Relevance to Medical Informatics. Svanaes D, Das A, Alsos OA, Stud Health Technol Inform 2008 541 546
28. The IsoMetrics usability inventory: an operationalization of ISO 9241-10 supporting summative and formative evaluation of software systems. Gediga GHKDI, Behaviour & Information Technology 1999 151 164 22073876
29. Dalkey NC, The Delphi Method: An Experimantal Study of group opinion 1969 http://www.rand.org/pubs/research-memoranda/2005/RM5888
30. Linestone HA, Turoff M, The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications 2002 http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/
31. Bortz J, Döring N, Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation (Research methods and evaluation): für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 4 2006
32. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Cronbach LJ, Psychometrika 1951 297 334
33. Gruber C, Arbeitseffizienz im Büro. Psychische Einflüsse auf SAP R/3 unterstützte Arbeitsprozesse: [online] University of Würzburg, Master thesis 2000 http://www.clemens-gruber.de/psychologie/sapr3/ 21982296
34. violinmplot: Combination of violin plot with mean and standard deviation. Majeed RW, http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/violinmplot/
35. Gesundheit-Grunddaten der Krankenhäuser. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden 2008
36. Gesundheit-Personal. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden 2009
37. Usability evaluation of clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management. Kastner M, Lottrige D, Straus SE, Implementation Science 2010 96
38. Exploring the unintended consequences of computerized physician order entry. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra R, Campbell E, Guappone KP, Stud Health Technol Inform 2007 129 198 202 17911706
39. Usability: a critical dimension for assessing the quality of clinical systems. Pearce C, Shachak A, Kushiniruk A, Lusignan S, Informatics in Primary Care 2009 195 198
40. Review of the XP Conference 2002. Italy and Standish Group. Fowler M, CHAOS Report 1995
41. IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing. Hübner U, Ammenwerth E, Flemming D, Schaubmayr C, Sellemann B, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2010 10 8 10.1186/1472-6947-10-8 20122275
42. Human research and data collection via the internet. Birnbaum MH, Annu Rev Psychol 2004 55 803 832 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601 14744235
43. Usability studies on interactive health information systems; where do we stand? Peute LW, Spithoven R, Bakker PJ, Jaspers MW, Stud Health Technol Inform 2008 136 327 332 18487752
44. Effects of the implementation of the web-based patient support system on staff's. Koivunen M, Valimaki M, Patel A, Knapp M, Hatonen H, Kuosmanen L, Pitkanen A, Anttila M, Katajisto J, Scand J Caring Sci 2010 24 592 599 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00755.x 20409064
45. Key performance indicators to benchmark hospital inforamtion systems-a delphi study. Hübner-Bloder G, Ammenwerth E, Methods Inf Med 2009 48 508 518 10.3414/ME09-01-0044 19893854
46. Verband der Hersteller von IT-Lösungen für das Gesundheitswesen e.V, VHitG-Branchenbarometer 2008. Markterhebung zur Bewertung und Verteilung von IT in den deutschen Krankenhäusern http://www.vhitg.de
47. Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional. Laerum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A, BMJ 2001 323 1344 1348 10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344 11739222 (Pubitemid 33152214)
48. How german hospitals govern it-an empirical exploration. Köbler F, Fähling J, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H, 17th European Conference on Information Systems 2009
49. Schneider W, Ergonomische Gestaltung von Benutzungsschnittstellen: Kommentar zur Grundsatznorm DIN EN ISO 9241-110 Berlin: Beuth 2 2008