A quantitative analysis of the impact of a computerised information system on nurses' clinical practice using a realistic evaluation framework

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 78, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 839-849

  Oroviogoicoechea, Cristina ^a   Watson, Roger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b School of Nursing and Midwifery   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computers; Evaluation studies; Information systems; Information technology; Nurses; Nursing; Patient records; Realistic evaluation; Socio technical approach

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION STUDIES; EVALUATION STUDY; PATIENT RECORD; PATIENT RECORDS; SOCIO-TECHNICAL APPROACH;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; HOSPITALS; NURSING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; NURSING PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPAIN; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSES; NURSING INFORMATICS;

EID: 71549128410     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Oroviogoicoechea C., Elliott B., and Watson R. Review: evaluating information systems in nursing. J. Clin. Nurs. 17 5 (2008) 567-575
2. Urquhart C., and Currell R. Reviewing the evidence on nursing record systems. Health Informatics J. 11 1 (2005) 33-44
3. Bostrom A.C., Schaffer P., Dontje K., Pohl J.M., Nagelkerk J., and Cavanagh S.J. Electronic health record. Implementation across the Michigan Academic Consortium. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 24 (2006) 44-52
4. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organisations: myths and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64 (2001) 143-156
5. Kaplan B., and Shaw N.T. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational and social issues. Methods Inf. Med. 43 (2004) 215-231
6. Ammenwerth E., Graber S., Herrmann G., Burkle T., and Konig J. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 71 (2003) 125-135
7. Van der Meijden M.J., Tange H.J., and Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 (2003) 235-243
8. Heathfield H.A. Evaluating clinical systems: the social programme perspective. Health Informatics J. 7 (2001) 8-12
9. Carlsson S.A. Advancing information systems evaluation (research): a critical realist approach. Electron. J. Inform. Syst. Eval. 6 2 (2003) 11-20
10. Pawson R., and Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation (1997), Sage Publications Ltd., London
11. Connelly J.B. Evaluating complex public health interventions: theory, methods and scope of realist enquiry. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 13 (2007) 935-941
12. Clarke A. Evaluation Research. An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice (1999), Sage Publications Ltd., London
13. Leca B. Naccache PA, critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization 13 5 (2006) 627-651
14. Reed M. Reflections on the "realist turn" in organisation and management studies. J. Manage. Stud. 42 8 (2005) 1621-1644
15. McEvoy P., and Richards D. Critical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing?. J. Adv. Nurs. 43 (2003) 411-420
16. Kazi M. Realist Evaluation in Practice Health and Social Work (2003), Sage Publications, London
17. C. Oroviogoicoechea, A realistic evaluation of the impact of a computerised information system on clinical practice: the nurses' perspective, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, UK, 2008.
18. Bryman A., and Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 12 and 13 (2005), Routledge, Hove, East Sussex
19. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1 (1992) 155-159
20. Loehlin J.C. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis. 4th ed. (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
21. Cramer D. Advanced Quantitative Data Analysis (2003), McGraw-Hill Education, Philadelphia
22. Muijs D. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS (2004), Sage Publications, London
23. Currie L.M. Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74 (2005) 908-916
24. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27 3 (2003) 425-478
25. Chiasson M., Reddy M., Kaplan B., and Davidson E. Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76S (2007) S89-S97
26. Carlsson S.A. Using critical realism in IS research. In: Whitman M.E., and Woszczynski A.B. (Eds). The Handbook of Information Systems Research (2004), Idea Group Publishing Ltd., Hershey, PA
27. Jenkings K.N. Problems encountered in integrated care records research. Health Informatics J. 10 4 (2004) 314-324