Routine use of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Procedural aspects and outcomes in 2209 patients treated in a single high-volume centre

Heart

Volumn 97, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 1938-1942

  Vink, Maarten A ^a   Amoroso, Giovanni ^a   Dirksen, Maurits T ^a   Van Der Schaaf, Rene J ^a   Patterson, Mark S ^a   Tijssen, Jan G P ^b   Kiemeneij, Ferdinand ^a   Slagboom, Ton ^a  

^a Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; ROUTINE TRANSRADIAL PROCEDURE; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TREATMENT DURATION; TREND STUDY; VASCULAR ACCESS;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUOROSCOPY; HEALTH FACILITY SIZE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80655124558     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300524     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, et al. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2187-95.
2. Verheugt FW, Steinhubl SR, Hamon M, et al. Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:191-7.
3. Hermanides RS, Ottervanger JP, Dambrink JH, et al. Incidence, predictors and prognostic importance of bleeding after primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention 2010;6:106-11.
4. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Comparative study on transradial approach vs. transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation for patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Test for Myocardial Infarction by Prospective Unicenter Randomization for Access Sites (TEMPURA) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:26-33. (Pubitemid 36528794)
5. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction e the RADIALeAMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005;150:543-9. (Pubitemid 41317627)
6. Brasselet C, Tassan S, Nazeyrollas P, et al. Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI trial. Heart 2007;93:1556-61. (Pubitemid 350205549)
7. Chodór P, Krupa H, Kurek T, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction (RADIAMI): a prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial. Cardiol J 2009;16:332-40.
8. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al.; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409-20.
9. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:173-8. (Pubitemid 23292091)
10. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-75. (Pubitemid 27201945)
11. Amoroso G, Sarti M, Bellucci R, et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of nurse workload during and after invasive coronary procedures: the potential benefit of a systematic radial access. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005;4:234-41. (Pubitemid 41140343)
12. Dirksen MT, Ronner E, Laarman GJ, et al. Early discharge is feasible following primary percutaneous coronary intervention with transradial stent implantation under platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade. Results of the AGGRASTENT Trial. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:512-17.
13. Slagboom T, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, et al. Actual outpatient PTCA: results of the OUTCLAS pilot study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:204-8. (Pubitemid 32532181)
14. Hetherington SL, Adam Z, Morley R, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery. Heart 2009;95:1612-18.
15. Pristipino C, Trani C, Nazzaro MS, et al. Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart 2009;95:476-82.
16. Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, et al. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1057-64.
17. Wang L, Yang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Prevalence of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in China: report from the Transradial coronary intervention Registration Investigation in China (TRIeChina). Int J Cardiol 2010;145:246-7.
18. Louvard Y, Kumar S, Lefèvre T. [Percentage of transradial approach for interventional cardiology in the world and learning the technique] (In French). Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2009;58:327-32.
19. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:379-86.
20. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008;94:1019-25. (Pubitemid 352039884)
21. Eichhöfer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, et al. Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor se: a large single-center experience. Am Heart J 2008;156:864-70.
22. Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart 2009;95:410-15.
23. Doyle BJ, Ting HH, Bell MR, et al. Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:202-9. (Pubitemid 351506552)
24. Burzotta F, Trani C, Hamon M, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with coronary bypass grafts: tips and tricks. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:263-72.
25. Terkelsen CJ, Sørensen JT, Maeng M, et al. System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2010;304:763-71.
26. Weaver AN, Henderson RA, Gilchrist IC, et al. Arterial access and door-to-balloon times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:695-9.
27. Pancholy S, Patel T, Sanghvi K, et al. Comparison of door-to-balloon times for primary PCI using transradial versus transfemoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:991-5.
28. Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Cox D, et al.; Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Investigators. Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow inpatients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1739-46. (Pubitemid 37433651)