Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions in patients with coronary bypass grafts: Tips and tricks

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 263-272

  Burzotta, Francesco ^a,d   Trani, Carlo ^a   Hamon, Martial ^b   Amaroso, Giovanni ^c   Kiemeneij, Ferdinand ^c  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^d NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Angiography; Bypass grafts; Coronary; GRAFT; PCI percutaneous coronary intervention; TRA; Transradial cath

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; SAPHENOUS VEIN; SURGICAL APPROACH; VASCULAR ACCESS;

CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; RADIAL ARTERY;

EID: 50849105756     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21567     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Louvard Y, Hamon M. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 204;44:349-356.
2. Sanmartin M, Cuevas D, Moxica J, Valdes M, Esparza J, Baz JA, Mantilla R, Iniguez A. Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: Feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:580-584.
3. Burzotta F, Trani C, Todaro D, Romagnoli E, Niccoli G, Giannico F, Talarico GP, Tommasino A, Mazzari MA, Mongiardo R, Schiavoni G, Crea F. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for the angiographic coronary evaluation of patients with internal mammary artery bypass CABG. J Cardiovasc Medicine 2008 (in press).
4. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314: 1-6.
5. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Schneider J, Arrowood M. Left internal mammary artery intervention: The left radial approach with a new guide catheter. J InVasive Cardiol 2000;12:298-302.
6. Cozzi S, Antona C, Montorsi P, Fabbiocchi F, Loaldi A, Apostolo A, Teruzzi G, Galli S, Ravagnani P, Grancini L, Trabattoni D, Bartorelli AL. Use of a new diagnostic catheter for transradial internal mammary artery angiography early after minimally invasive coronary bypass. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;50:371-374.
7. Burfeind WR Jr, Glower DD, Wechsler AS, Tuttle RH, Shaw LK, Harrell FE Jr, Rankin JS. Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass: 15-year follow-up of a clinical practice trial. Circulation 2004;110 (11 Suppl 1):II27-35.
8. Cha KS, Kim MH. Feasibility and safety of concomitant left internal mammary arteriography at the setting of the right transradial coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;56: 188-195.
9. Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim HJ, Kim JS. Bilateral selective internal mammary artery angiography via right radial approach: Clinical experience with newly designed Yumiko catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:19-24.
10. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:616-626.
11. Chen YH, Wu CJ, Chang HW, Fang CY, Chen CJ, Yu TH, Chen SM, Hung WC, Cheng CI, Yip HK. Effects and safety of intracoronary thrombectomy using transradial application of the PercuSurge distal balloon protection system in patients with early or recent myocardial infarction. Cardiology 2004;102:206-214.
12. Banks M, Patterson M, Kiemeneij F. Symbiot stent delivery via 8 Fr guiding catheter from the right radial artery in an acute coronary syndrome due to a degenerating saphenous vein graft: A strategy for reducing access site complications. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:96-97.
13. Burzotta F, Trani C, Mazzari MA, Mongiardo R, Rebuzzi AG, Buffon A, Niccoli G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Romagnoli E, Ramazzotti V, Schiavoni G, Crea F. Use of a second buddy wire during percutaneous coronary interventions: A simple solution for some challenging situations. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:171-174.
14. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE,Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2302-2309.
15. Kamiya H, Ushijima T, Kanamori T, Ikeda C, Nakagaki C, Ueyama K, Watanabe G. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1505-1509.
16. Kim KB, Cho KR, Choi JS, Lee HJ. Right gastroepiploic artery for revascularization of the right coronary territory in off-pump total arterial revascularization: Strategies to improve patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:2135-2141.
17. Yamashita T, Imai S, Tamada T, Yamamoto A, Egashira N, Watanabe S, Higashi H, Gyoten M. Transradial approach for noncoronary angiography and interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:303-308.