Counting the cost of carbon in bioenergy systems: Sources of variation and hidden pitfalls when comparing life cycle assessments

Biofuels

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 693-707

  Rowe, Rebecca ^a   Whitaker, Jeanette ^b   Freer Smith, Peter H ^a,c   Chapman, Jennifer ^a   Ryder, Stephen ^b   Ludley, Kate E ^b   Howard, David C ^b   Taylor, Gail ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^c FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIO-ENERGY; BIO-ENERGY SYSTEMS; BIOFUELS PRODUCTION; HEAT AND POWER; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; LIQUID BIOFUELS; LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY; POSITIVE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE FUELS; SOURCES OF VARIATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEMPERATE CLIMATE;

BIOFUELS; CLIMATOLOGY; FOSSIL FUELS; LIQUIDS;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 80455174365     PISSN: 17597269     EISSN: 17597277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4155/bfs.11.131     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Renewable Fuels Agency: The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production. Renewable Fuels Agency, Surrey, UK.
2. Renewable Fuels Agency. Year one of the RTFO: renewable fuels agency report on the renewable transport fuel obligation 2008/09. Renewable Fuels Agency, Surrey, UK (2010).
3. European Parliament. Directive 2009/28/ec of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (2009).
4. Hammerschlag R. Ethanol's energy return on investment: a survey of the literature 1990-present. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(6), 1744-1750 (2006).
5. The Royal Society. Sustainable Biofuels: Prospects and Challenges. Royal Society. London, UK (2008).
6. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 1235-1238 (2008).
7. OECD. Biofuels: is the Cure Worse than the Disease? 57 (2007).
8. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319, 1238-1240 (2008).
9. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA et al. Beneficial biofuels-the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325(5938), 270-271 (2009).
10. Thamsiriroj T, Murphy JD. Can rape seed biodiesel meet the European Union sustainability criteria for biofuels? Energy Fuels 24(3), 1720-1730 (2010).
11. Roundtable on sustainable biofuels: RSB principles & criteria for sustainable biofuel production. RBS, Lausanne, Switzerland. (2009).
12. Rowe RL, Street NR, Taylor G. Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 271-290 (2009).
13. Kim S, Dale BE. Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 29(6), 426-439 (2005).
14. Delucchi MA. Lifecycle Analyses of Biofuels. ITS UCDAVIS, CA, USA (2006).
15. Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S. Energy-and greenhouse gas-based lca of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservat. Recycl. 53(8), 434-447 (2009).
16. Davis SC, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Delucia EH. Life-cycle ana lysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends Plant Sci. 14(3), 140-146 (2009).
17. Gnansounou E, Dauriat A, Villegas J, Panichelli L. Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances. Bioresource Technol. 100(21), 4919-4930 (2009).
18. Kendall A, Chang B. Estimating life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from corn-ethanol: a critical review of current US Practices. J. Cleaner Product. 17(13), 1175-1182 (2009). □ Discusses the current treatment of land use change within LCAs and the challenges in developing certification schemes which include land-use change.
19. Rowe R, Whitaker J, Chapman J, Howard DC, Taylor G. Life cycle assessment in the bioenergy sector: developing a systematic review. UK ERC (2008). □ Working paper detailing the review method used within this manuscript.
20. ISO: ISO 14044. Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines. (ISO 14044), International Organization for Standardization (2006).
21. Punter G, Rickeard D, Larivé JF et al. Well-to-Wheel Evaluation for Production of Ethanol from Wheat. (Report FWG-P-04-024), (2004).
22. Concawe, Eucar, Ecjrc. Well-to-Wheels Ana lysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context. Well-to-tank report, version 2 c, 140 (2007).
23. Ortiz-Canavate J. Characteristics of different types of gaseous and liquid biofuels and their energy-balance. J. Agricul. Eng Res. 59(4), 231-238 (1994).
24. Woods J, Bauen A. Technology Status Review and Carbon Abatement Potential of Renewable Transport Fuels in the UK. DTI, UK (2003).
25. Janulis P. Reduction of energy consumption in biodiesel fuel life cycle. Renew. Energy 29(6), 861-871 (2004).
26. Dewulf J, Van Langenhove H, Van De Velde B. Exergy-based efficiency and renewability assessment of biofuel production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(10), 3878-3882 (2005).
27. Levelton Engineering Ltd. Assessment of Net Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Ethanol-Blended Gasolines in Canada: Lignocellulosic feedstocks. (R-2000-2), Richmond, BC, Canada (2000).
28. Whitaker J, Ludley KE, Rowe R, Taylor G, Howard DC. Sources of variability in greenhouse gas and energy balances for biofuel production: a systematic review. GCB Bioenergy 2(3), 99-112 (2010). □ □ Discuss issues relating to the allocation of co-product credits and their impact on LCA.
29. Börjesson P. Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective - what determines this? Appl. Energy 86(5), 589-594 (2009).
30. Renewable Fuels Agency. Carbon and Sustainability Reporting Within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation Technical Guidance. Part two v3.1. Carbon reporting - default values and fuel chains (2010).
31. Nelson B. Data sharing: empty archives. Nature 461, 160-163 (2009).
32. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (miame)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 29, 365-371 (2001).
33. Davis SC, Anderson-Teixeria KJ, Delucia EH. Life-cycle ana lysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends Plant Sci. 14(3), 140-146 (2009).
34. 2 emissions of perennial grasses miscanthus, switchgrass and reed canary grass. ADAS Contracting Ltd. (2001).
35. Styles D, Jones MB. Energy crops in Ireland: quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity Biomass Bioenergy 31(11-12), 759-772 (2007).
36. Boehmel C, Lewandowski I, Claupein W. Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities. Agricult. Syst. 96(1-3), 224-236 (2008).
37. Dubuisson X, Sintzoff I. Energy and CO balances in different power generation routes using wood fuel from short rotation coppice. Biomass Bioenergy 15(4-5), 379-390 (1998).
38. International Energy Agency: biofuels. Pol. Analy. Ser. (1994).
39. Yoshioka T, Aruga K, Nitami T, Kobayashi H, Sakai H. Energy and carbon dioxide (CO 2) balance of logging residues as alternative energy resources: system ana lysis based on the method of a life cycle inventory (LCI) ana lysis. J. For. Res. 10(2), 125-134 (2005).
40. Walle IV, Van Camp N, Van De Casteele L, Verheyen K, Lemeur R. Short-rotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in fanders (belgium) ii. Energy production and CO emission reduction potential. Biomass Bioenergy 31(5), 276-283 (2007).
41. Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Volk TA. Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenergy 25(2), 147-165 (2003). □ Gives a detailed and clear example of the impact of fertilizer choice and changes in soil carbon on GHG emissions.
42. Qin X, Mohan T, El-Halwagi M, Cornforth G, McCarl B. Switchgrass as an alternate feedstock for power generation: an integrated environmental, energy and economic life-cycle assessment. Clean Technol. Environ. Pol. 8(4), 233-249 (2006).
43. Woods J, Tipper R, Brown G, Diaz-Chavez R, Lovell J, De Groot P. Evaluating the Sustainability of Co-fring in the UK. Report Number URN 06/1960. Themba Technology Ltd., London, UK (2006).
44. Matthews RW. Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems. Biomass Bioenergy 21, 1-19 (2001).
45. Mann MK, Spath PL. Life cycle assessment of a biomass gasification combined-cycle power system. Fuel Energy Extracts 40(2), 147-165 (1997).
46. Wihersaari M. Greenhouse gas emissions from fnal harvest fuel chip production in fnland. Biomass Bioenergy 28(5), 435-443 (2005).
47. Wihersaari M. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission risks from storage of wood residue. Biomass Bioenergy 28(5), 444-453 (2005). □ □ Models and discusses the potential impact of methane emission from the storage of woodchips.
48. Mortimer ND, Mwabonje O, Hunter AJ. Nitrous oxide emissions from biofuel feedstock cultivation (2009).
49. 2 emissions from lime and urea application. In: Chapter 11 in '2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007).
50. 2O to the greenhouse gas balance of frst-generation biofuels. Global Change Biol. 15(1), 1-23 (2009).
51. Liska AJ, Perrin RK. Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref 3(3), 318-328 (2009).
52. Matthews JA, Tan H. Biofuels and indirect land use change effects: the debate continues. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 3(3), 305-317 (2009).
53. Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD. The ecological impact of biofuels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systemat. 41(1), 351-377 (2010).
54. Kim H, Kim S, Dale BE. Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(3), 961-967 (2009).
55. Börjesson P, Tufvesson LM. Agricultural crop-based biofuels - resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes. J. Cleaner Product. 19(2-3), 108-120 (2011).
56. Ecofys: mitigating indirect impacts of biofuel production: case studies and methodology (2009).
57. Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in brazil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107(8), 3388-3393 (2010).
58. Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW et al. Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science 326(5958), 1397-1399 (2009).
59. Giltrap DL, Li C, Saggar S. DNDC: a process-based model of greenhouse gas fuxes from agricultural soils. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 136(3-4), 292-300 (2010).
60. Mortimer ND, Cormack P, Elsayed MA, Horne RE. Evaluation of the Comparative Energy, Global Warming and Socio-Economic Costs and Benefts of Biodiesel. Final report to DEFRA. Resources reserach unit, Shefleld Hallam University, UK (2003).
61. 2 balances in different power generation routes using wood fuel from short rotation coppice. Biomass Bioenergy 15(4-5), 379-390 (1998).
62. GM, BP, Exxonmobil, Shell, Totalfnaelf. GM Well-to-Wheel Ana lysis of Energy Use and Greenhouse gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - a European Study (2002).
63. Ahlvick P, Brandberg A. Well-to-wheel efficency: for alternative fuels from natural gas or biomass. 121 (2001).
64. Gover MP, Collins SA, Hitchcock GS, Moon DP, Wilkins GT. Alternative Road Transport Fuels - A Preliminary Life Cycle Study for the UK. (Volume 1 & 2). Energy Technology Support Unit, Harwell, Oxford, UK (1996).
65. Fleming JS, Habibi S, Maclean HL. Investigating the sustainability of lignocellulose-derived fuels for light-duty vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D. Trans. Environ. 11(2), 146-159 (2006).
66. Ademe, Direm: Bilans énergétiques et gaz à effet de serre des flières de production de biocarburants. 132 (2002).
67. DEFRA, DECC: Guidelines to DEFRA, DECC's GHG conversion factors for company reporting, version v2.0. (2009).
68. Odeh NA, Cockerill TT. Life cycle ana lysis of uk coal fred power plants. Energy Conver. Manag. 49(2), 212-220 (2008).
69. Spath PL, Mann MK, Kerr DR. Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-fred Power Production. NREL, CO, USA (1999).
70. Kartha S, Lazarus M, Bosi M. Baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in the electric power sector. Energy Pol. 32(4), 545-566 (2004). □ □ Gives a detailed assessment of the different methods, which can be used to calculate baseline GHG emissions during electricity production at regional and national scales.
71. Steenhof P. Estimating greenhouse gas emission reduction potential: an assessment of models and methods for the power sector. Environ. Model. Assess. 14(1), 17-28 (2009).
72. Karp A, Shield I. Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytolog. 179(1), 15-32 (2008).