Energy crops in Ireland: Quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 31, Issue 11-12, 2007, Pages 759-772

  Styles, David ^a   Jones, Michael B ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Greenhouse gas emissions; Ireland; Life cycle assessment; Miscanthus; SRC willow

Indexed keywords

CULTIVATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; IRELAND; LIFE CYCLE; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MISCANTHUS; SRC WILLOW;

CROPS;

CROPS; CULTIVATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; IRELAND; LIFE CYCLE; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CROP ROTATION; ELECTRICITY; EMISSION; ENERGY CROP; GRASS; GREENHOUSE GAS; LIFE CYCLE; SUGAR BEET;

EURASIA; EUROPE; IRELAND; WESTERN EUROPE;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; BOS; MISCANTHUS; OVIS ARIES; SALIX;

EID: 35348984924     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. McGettigan M., Duffy P., Connolly N., and O'Brien P. National inventory report 2006: greenhouse gas emissions 1990-2004 reported to the United Nations framework on climate change (2006), Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford
2. Central Statistics Office (CSO). Web site. 〈http://www.cso.ie/statistics/AgricultureandFishing.htm〉. Accessed September 2005.
3. Casey J.W., and Holden N.M. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agricultural Systems 86 (2004) 97-114
4. Refsgaard K., Halberg N., and Kristensen E.S. Energy utilization in crop and dairy production in organic and conventional livestock production systems. Agricultural Systems 57 (1998) 599-630
5. Kuesters J., and Lammel J. Investigations of the energy efficiency of the production of winter wheat and sugar beet in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 11 (1999) 35-43
6. Cederberg C., and Mattsson B. Life cycle assessment of milk production-a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8 (2000) 49-50
7. Brentrup F., Kuesters J., Kuhlman H., and Lammel J. Application of the LCA methodology to agricultural production: an example of sugar beet production with different forms of nitrogen fertilisers. European Journal of Agronomy 14 (2001) 221-233
8. Dalgaard T., Halberg N., and Porter J.R. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87 (2001) 51-65 [Dalgaard]
9. Wells C. Total energy indicators of agricultural sustainability: dairy farming case study (2001), University of Otago, Otago
10. 2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91 (2002) 175-189
11. Brentrup F., Kusters J., Kuhlmann H., and Lammel J. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology. I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 20 (2004) 247-267
12. Binfield J., Donnellan T., Hanrahan K., and Westhoff P. The Luxembourg CAP reform agreement: implications for EU and Irish Agriculture. Medium term analysis for the agri-food sector (2003), Teagasc, Dublin
13. Donnellan T., and Hanrahan K. Greenhouse gas emissions from Irish agriculture (2003), Teagasc, Dublin
14. Styles D, Thorne F, Jones MB. Energy crops in Ireland: an economic comparison of Miscanthus and willow production with conventional farming systems. Biomass & Bioenergy, accepted.
15. Styles D., and Jones M.B. Current and future competitiveness of electricity and heat from energy crops: a case study from Ireland. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 4355-4367
16. 2 balances in different power generation routes using wood fuel from short rotation coppice. Biomass & Bioenergy 15 (1998) 379-390
17. Elsayed M.A., Matthews R., and Mortimer N.D. Carbon and energy balances for a range of biofuels options (2003), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
18. Hansson P.-A., Dahlin B., and Blinge M. Air emissions from the fuel supply system of a Swedish CHP plant and the effects of stricter emissions regulations. Biomass & Bioenergy 24 (2003) 59-68
19. Lettens S., Muys B., Ceulmans R., Moons E., Garcia J., and Coppin P. Energy budget and greenhouse gas balance evaluation of sustainable coppice systems for electricity production. Biomass & Bioenergy 24 (2003) 179-197
20. 2-balance for the cultivation and combustion of Miscanthus. Biomass & Bioenergy 8 (1995) 81-90
21. Hanegraaf M., Biewinga E.E., and van der Bijl G. Assessing the ecological and economic sustainability of energy crops. Biomass & Bioenergy 14 (1998) 345-355
22. Lewandowski I., and Heinz A. Delayed harvest of Miscanthus-influences on biomass quantity and quality and environmental impacts of energy production. European Journal of Agronomy 19 (2003) 45-63
23. van den Broek R., Faaij A., van Wijk A., Kent T., Bulfin M., Healion K., et al. Willow firing in retrofitted Irish peat power plants. Biomass & Bioenergy 12 (1997) 75-90
24. van den Broek R., Teeuwisse S., Healion K., Kent T., van Wijk A., Faaij A., et al. Potentials for electricity production from wood in Ireland. Energy 26 (2001) 991-1013
25. SEI. Co-firing with biomass (report prepared by Elekrowatt-Ekono) (2004), SEI, Dublin
26. Jones M.B., and Walsh M. Miscanthus: for energy and fibre (2001), James and James, Ltd., London
27. Londo M., Vleeshouwers L., Dekker J., and de Graaf H. Energy farming in Dutch dessication abatement areas: yields and benefits compared to grass cultivation. Biomass & Bioenergy 20 (2001) 337-350
28. Styles D, Jones MB. Energy crops in Ireland: an assessment of their potential contribution to sustainable agriculture, electricity and heat production. EPA Report, Wexford Ireland, in press.
29. IPCC. Chapter 6: radiative forcing of climate change. In: IPCC. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. 〈http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wgl/248.htm〉. Accessed August 2005.
30. Connolly L., Kinsella A., and Quinlan G. National Farm Survey 2003 (2004), Teagasc, Dublin
31. Coulter B.S., Murphy W.E., CuUeton N., Finnerty E., and Connolly L. A survey of fertiliser use in 2000 for grassland and arable crops (2002), Teagasc, Dublin
32. CuUeton N., Murphy W.E., and Coulter B. Lime in Irish agriculture (1999), The Fertilizer Association of Ireland, Dublin
33. Elsayed M.A., and Mortimer N.D. Carbon and energy modelling of biomass systems: conversion plant and data updates (2001), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield
34. DEFRA. Growing short rotation coppice: best practice guidelines for entrants to DEFRA's energy crop scheme. 〈http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/pdfs/ecs/src-guide.pdf〉. Accessed August 2005.
35. 2 emissions of the perennial grasses Miscanthus, Switchgrass and Reed canary grass (2001), Energy Technology Support Unit, Harwell
36. Clifton-Brown J.C., Neilson B., Lewandowski I., and Jones M.B. The modelled productivity of Miscanthus x giganteus (GREEF et DEU) in Ireland. Industrial Crops and Products 12 (2000) 97-109
37. Heller M.C., Keoleian G.A., and Volk T.A. Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass & Bioenergy 25 (2003) 147-165
38. Gigler J.K., Meerdink G., and Hendrix E.M.T. Willow supply strategies to energy plants. Biomass & Bioenergy 17 (1999) 185-198
39. Gigler J.K., van Loon W.K.P., and Sonneveld C. Experiment and modelling of parameters influencing natural wind drying of willow chunks. Biomass & Bioenergy 26 (2004) 507-514
40. Rural Generation. Description and costs for willow planting on grass ley. 〈www.ruralgeneration.com〉. Accessed January 2006.
41. IPCC. Energy. In: IPCC. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. 〈http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/guidelin/chlref2.pdf〉 Accessed August 2005.
42. Howley M., O'Leary F., and O'Gallachoir B. Energy in Ireland 1990-2003: trends, issues and indicators (2006), Sustainable Energy Ireland, Dublin
43. Matthews R.B., and Grogan P. Potential C-sequestration rates of short-rotation coppiced willow and Miscanthus biomass crops: a modelling study. Aspects of Applied Biology 65 (2001)
44. Connolly D., and Rooney S. A study of the environmental impacts of the generation of electricity at the Europeat 1 and Moneypoint powerstations (1997), University College Dublin Environmental Institute, Dublin
45. Hartmann D., and Kaltschmitt M. Electricity generation from solid biomass via co-combustion with coal: energy and emission balances from a German case study. Biomass & Bioenergy 16 (1999) 397-406
46. van Loo S., and Koppejan J. Handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing (2003), Twente University Press
47. In: El Bassam N. (Ed). Energy plant species: their use and impact on environment and development (1998), James and James, London
48. Bayerische Landesanstalt fur Landwirtschaft. Examination of various cultivation techniques for Miscanthus giganteus for improving young plants' ability to survive the winter as well as for reducing the costs of setting up crop stands (2000), Institut fur Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzuchtung, Giessen
49. Leahy P., kiely G., and Scanlon T. Managed grasslands: a greenhouse gas source or sink?. Geophysical Research Letters 31 (2004) L20507
50. 2O fluxes from agricultural fields. Journal of Geophysical Research 100 (1995) 25923-25931
51. Oenema O., Velthof G.L., Yamulki S., and Jarvis S.C. Nitrous oxide emissions from grazed grassland. Soil Use and Management 13 (1997) 288-295
52. Scanlon T.M., and Kiely G. Ecosystem-scale measurements of nitrous oxide fluxes for an intensely grazed, fertilised grassland. Geophysical Research Letters 30 (2003) 1852
53. Dobbie K.E., McTaggart I.P., and Smith K.A. Nitrous oxide emissions from intensive agricultural systems: variations between crops and seasons, key driving variables, and mean emission factors. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (1999) 26891-26899
54. Maag M., and Vinther F.P. Nitrous oxide emissions by nitrification and denitrification in different soil types and at different moisture contents and temperatures. Applied Soil Ecology 4 (1996) 5-14
55. Grigal D.F., and Berguson W.E. Soil carbon changes associated with short rotation systems. Biomass & Bioenergy 14 (1998) 371-377
56. Jug A., Makeschin F., Rehfuess K.E., and Hofinann-Schielle C. Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the federal Republic of Germany. III. Soil ecological effects. Forest Ecology and Management 121 (1999) 85-99
57. Zan C.F., Fyles J.W., Girouard P., and Samson R.A. Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86 (2001) 135-144
58. van den Broek R., van Wijk A., and Turkenburg W. Electricity from energy crops in different settings-a country comparison between Nicaragua, Ireland and The Netherlands. Biomass & Bioenergy 22 (2002) 79-98
59. Perttu K.L. Environmental justification for short-rotation forestry in Sweden. Biomass & Bioenergy 15 (1998) 1-6
60. Perttu K.L., and Kowalik P.J. Salix vegetation filters for purification of waters and soils. Biomass & Bioenergy 12 (1997) 9-19
61. CEC. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council: establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Official Journal of the European Communities. Luxembourg: CEC; 2000. p. 1-72.
62. Smith P., Powlson D.S., Smith J.U., Falloon P., and Coleman K. Meeting Europe's climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Global Change Biology 6 (2000) 525-539
63. Martin S., and Seeland G. Effects of specialisation in cattle production in harmful emissions. Livestock Production Science 61 (1999) 171-178
64. Rice B, Quinlan G. An estimate of fuel use and related emissions on Irish farms. Tullamore: Irish Agricultural Research Forum Proceedings; 2003.
65. Matthews R.W. Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice. Biomass & Bioenergy 21 (2001) 1-19