Impact of various lecture delivery methods in pharmacology

EXCLI Journal

Volumn 9, Issue , 2010, Pages 96-101

  Seth, Vikas ^a   Upadhyaya, Prerna ^a   Ahmad, Mushtaq ^a   Kumar, Virendra ^a  

^a GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Audiovisual aids; Chalkboard; Medical education; OHP; PowerPoint; Teaching methods

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PHARMACOLOGY; STUDENT ATTITUDE; STUDENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 80455155250     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16112156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bartsch RA, Cobern KM. Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Comput Educ 2003;41:77-86.
2. Casanova J, Casanova SL. Computers as electronic blackboard: Remodeling the organic chemistry lecture. Educom Rev 1991;31-34.
3. Creed T. PowerPoint No! Cyberspace Yes! The National Teaching and Learning Forum. New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1998.
4. Ernest K, Anand KN, Kanagasabapathy N, Chandy SJ, Kuruvilla A, Thomas M. Patient oriented problem solving (POPS) approach and audiovisual aided lectures in teaching pharmacology-A comparative study. Indian J Pharmacol 1998;30:97-101.
5. Estes A, Ressler S, Welch R, Hanus J. Seminar on communication skills. Exceed teaching workshop 2009. Available from: http://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Leadership_Training/EXCEED/USMA-09-Sem inar-VI-Chalkboard.ppt. Accessed June 10, 2010.
6. Garg A, Rataboli PV, Muchandi K. Students' opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended. Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36: 155-158.
7. Hunt N. Enhancing lectures the modern way. The New Academic 1998;3-9.
8. Lowry RB. Electronic presentation of lectures-effect upon student performance. U Chem Ed 1999;8:18-21.
9. Mayer RE, Anderson RB. The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. J Edu Psych 1992;84:444-452.
10. Novelli ELB, Fernandes AAH. Students' preferred teaching techniques for biochemistry in biomedicine and medicine courses. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2007;35:263-266.
11. Rocklin T. PowerPoint is not an Evil. The National Teaching and Learning Forum. New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1998.
12. Rossen S, McGraw D, Graham E, Lee D. Enhancing your lecture with presentation software-Setting instructional goals. 1997. Last updated September 1997 by David McGraw for Faculty New Media Center (FNMC) at UCLA Office of Instructional Development. Available from: http://www.oid.ucla.edu. Accessed June 10, 2010.
13. Sammons MC. Using PowerPoint presentations in writing classes. The Technology Source 1997. Available from: http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=519. Accessed June 10, 2010.
14. Shah HK. Overhead Projector-A Versatile Teaching Tool. Indian J of Community Med 2006;31. Available from http://www.indmedica.com/journals.php?journalid=7&issueid=73&art icleid=942&action=article. Accessed June 10, 2010.
15. Shallcross DE, Harrison TG. Lectures: electronic presentations versus chalk and talk-a chemist's view. Chem Educ Res Pract 2007;8:73-79.
16. Sharma R, Verma U, Kapoor B, Chopra VS. Novel teaching approaches in Pharmacology. JK Science 2004;6:172-173.
17. Szabo A, Hastings N. Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Comput Educ 2000;35:175-187.