Lectures: Electronic presentations versus chalk and talk - A chemist's view

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 73-79

  Shallcross, Dudley E ^a   Harrison, Timothy G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Bristol ChemLabS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electronic presentations; Lectures

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846673393     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/B6RP90021F     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Ausubel D.P., (1968), Educational psychology: A cognitive view, New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2. Bartsch R.A.and Cobern K.M., (2003), Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures, Computers and Education, 41, 77-86.
3. Brown G., (1978), Lecturing and explaining, Methuen, London.
4. Brown G. and Atkins M., (1988), Effective teaching in higher education, London, Routledge.
5. Cannon R., (1988), Lecturing, Kensington (N.S.W.), Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
6. Falk B. and Dow K.L., (1971), The assessment of university teaching, The Society for Research into Higher Education, London.
7. Johnstone A.H. and Percival F., (1976), Attention breaks in lectures, Education in Chemistry, 13, 49-50.
8. Lowry R.B., (1999), Electronic presentation of lectures - effect upon student performance, University Chemistry Education, 8, 18-21.
9. OFSTED (2002) ICT in schools: effect of government initiatives Secondary Science June 2002 HMI 715. Report from the Office of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools.
10. Preston C., (2004), Learning to use ICT in classrooms: teachers' and trainers' perspectives, Teacher Training Agency.
11. Szabo A. and Hastings N., (2000), Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers and Education, 35, 175-187.
12. Walton A.J., (1972), Lectures, tutorials and the like, Oxford and Lancaster, MTP.