Special education, poverty, and the limits of private enforcement

Notre Dame Law Review

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1413-1493

  Pasachoff, Eloise ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80455143155     PISSN: 07453515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (154)

1. Catherine R. Albiston & Laura Beth Nielsen, The Procedural Attack on Civil Rights: The Empirical Reality of Buckhannon for the Private Attorney General, 54 UCLA L. REV. 1087, 1132-34 (2007)
2. Samuel R. Bagenstos, Spending Clause Litigation in the Roberts Court, 58 DUKE LJ. 345, 409 (2008)
3. Mark A. Cohen & Paul H. Rubin, Private Enforcement of Public Policy, 3 YALE J. ON REG. 167, 168-69 (1985)
4. Pamela S. Karlan, Disarming the Private Attorney General, 2003 U. ILL. L. REV. 183, 186
5. Gary Bellow, Steady Work: A Practitioner's Reflections on Political Lawyering, 31 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 297, 297-305 (1996)
6. Michael Selmi, Public vs. Private Enforcement of Civil Rights: The Case of Housing and Employment, 45 UCLA L. REV. 1401, 1458-59 (1998)
7. Matthew C. Stephenson, Public Regulation of Private Enforcement: The Case for Expanding the Role of Administrative Agencies, 91 VA. L. REV. 93, 108-09, 130-31 (2005)
8. Melanie Natasha Henry, Comment, No Child Ijeft Behind? Educational Malpractice Litigation for the 21st Century, 92 CALIF. L. REV. 1117, 1158-68 (2004)
9. Amy M. Reichbach, Note, The Power Behind the Promise: Enforcing No Child Left Behind to Improve Education, 45 B.C. L. REV. 667, 693-703 (2004)
10. Michael Selmi, The Value of the EEOC: Reexamining the Agency's Role in Employment Discrimination Law, 57 OHIO ST. L.J. 1, 64 (1996)
11. BRIAN K. LANDSBERG, ENFORCING CIVIL RIGHTS 43-44 (1997).
12. Kathryn Moss et al., Unfunded Mandate: An Empirical Study of the Implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 50 U. KAN. L. REV. 1, 27 n.144 (2001)
13. Robert G. Schwemm, Private Enforcement and the Fair Housing Act, 6 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 375, 379-80 (1988)
14. Arthur Best & Alan R. Andreasen, Consumer Response to Unsatisfactory Purchases: A Survey of Perceiving Defects, Voicing Complaints, and Obtaining Redress, 11 LAW & SocV REV. 701, 720-24 (1977)
15. MARK KELMAN & GILLIAN LESTER, JUMPING THE QUEUE 67-92 (1997)
16. Daniela Caruso, Bargaining and Distribution in Special Education, 14 CORNELL J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 171, 171-73 (2005)
17. Thomas Hehir, Looking Forward: Toward a New Role in Promoting Educational Equity for Students with Disabilities from Low-Income Backgrounds, in HANDBOOK OF EDUCATION POLICY RESEARCH 831, 836 (Gary Sykes et al. eds., 2009)
18. Erin Phillips, Note, When Parents Aren't Enough: External Advocacy in Special Education, 117 YALE L.J. 1802, 1836-37 (2008)
19. Margaret M. Wakelin, Comment, Challenging Disparities in Special Education: Moving Parents from Disempowered Team Members to Ardent Advocates, 3 Nw. J.L. & Soc. POLV 263, 269-71 (2008).
20. BETH HARRY & JANETTE KLINCNER, WHY ARE SO MANY MINORITY STUDENTS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION? (2006)
21. COMM. ON MINORITY REPRESENTATION IN SPECIAL EDUC, NAT'L RESEARCH COUNCIL, MINORITY STUDENTS IN SPECIAL AND GIFTED EDUCATION (M. Suzanne Donovan & Christopher T. Cross eds., 2002)
22. RACIAL INEQUITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION (Daniel J. Losen & Gary Orfield eds., 2002)
23. Daniel J. Losen & Kevin G. Welner, Disabling Discrimination in Our Public Schools: Comprehensive Ilegal Challenges to Inappropriate and Inadequate Special Education Services for Minority Children, 36 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 407, 430 (2001).
24. DEP'T OF EDUC, 27TH ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT, 2005, at xiv (2007).
25. Alyson Klein, Guidelines Sketch Out Use of Aid, EDUC. WK., Mar. 18, 2009, at 16.
26. Eloise Pasachoff, How the Federal Government Can Improve School Financing Systems 4-5, 27-28 (Jan. 2008) (unpublished manuscript), available at http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Fils/rc/papers/2008/01-education-pasachoff/ 01-education-paschoff.pdf.
27. JAY G. CHAMBERS ET AL., CTR. FOR SPECIAL EDUC. FIN., REPORT 4: WHAT ARE WE SPENDING ON PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1999-2000?, at 8-9 (2003), available at http://www.csef-air.org/publications/seep/national/ Procedural%20Safeguards.PDF
28. U.S. GEN. ACCOUNTING OFFICE, GAO-03-897, SPECIAL EDUCATION: NUMBERS OF FORMAL DISPUTES ARE GENERALLY LOW AND STATES ARE USING MEDIATION AND OTHER STRATEGIES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS 13-14 (2003).
29. R. SHEP MELNICK, BETWEEN THE LINES 135, 140, 158-59 (1994)
30. Samuel R. Bagenstos, Where Have All the Lawsuits Gone? The Shockingly Small Role of the Courts in Implementing the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Wash. Univ. Sch. of Law Working Paper No. 08-12-05, 2008), available at http://ssm.com/abstract/=l302085.
31. Thomas Hehir & Sue Gamm, Special Education: From Legalism to Collaboration, in LAW AND SCHOOL REFORM 205, 214 (Jay P. Heubert ed., 1999)
32. David Neal & David L. Kirp, The Allure of Legalization Reconsidered: The Case of Special Education, in SCHOOL DAYS, RULE DAYS 343, 354 (David L. Kirp & Donald N.Jensen eds., 1986)
33. Jonathan A. Beyer, A Modest Proposal: Mediating IDEA Disputes Without Splitting the Baby, 28J.L. & EDUC. 37, 41-48 (1999).
34. Assistance to States for the Education of Students with Disabilities Program and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities, 57 Fed. Reg. 44,794, 44,829 (Sept. 29, 1992) (current version at 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.151-153 (2010))
35. Assistance to States for the Education of Students with Disabilities and the Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities, 64 Fed. Reg. 12,406, 12,413 (Mar. 12, 1999)
36. Nicole Suchey & Dixie Snow Huefner, The State Complaint Procedure Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 64 J. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN 529 (1998).
37. JENNIFER L. HOCHSCHILD & NATHAN SCOVRONICK, THE AMERICAN DREAM AND THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 140 (2003)
38. Rachel A. Holler & Perry A. Zirkel, Section 504 and Public Schools: A National Survey Concerning "Section 504-Only" Students, 92 NASSP BULL. 19, 23 (2008)
39. Wade F. Horn & Douglas Tynan, Time to Make Special Education Special Again, in RETHINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR A NEW CENTURY 23, 30-31 (Chester E. Finn, Jr. et al. eds., 2001)
40. Daniel McGroarty, The Little-Known Case of America's Ijirgest School Choice Program, in RETHINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR A NEW CENTURY, supra, at 289, 293-94
41. Christine Gralow, The Special-Needs Kindergarten Crunch, LESSON PLANS (Sept. 22, 2008, 9:09 PM), http://lessonplans.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/the- special-needs-kindergarten-crunch/?scp=l&sq=special- needs+kindergartenrunch&st=cse&apage=l.
42. Michael J. Opuda, A Comparison of Parents Who Initiated Due Process Hearings and Complaints in Maine 57-58, 92 (Nov. 17, 1997)
43. JAY G. CHAMBERS ET AL., CTR. FOR SPECIAL EDUC. FIN., REPORT 2: How DOES SPENDING ON SPECIAL EDUCATION VARY ACROSS DISTRICTS?, at iv, 7-8 (2002), available at http://www.csef-air.org/publications/seep/national/advRpt2.PDF.
44. THOMAS HEHIR, NEW DIRECTIONS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION 120-24 (2005).
45. Dick Zeller, Five Year State and National Summaries of Dispute Resolution Data, CADRE, 28 (Dec. 21, 2010), http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/pdf/ National%20Part%20B%20Table%207%20Summary%20CADRE520Dec5202010.pdf.
46. Kenneth R. Weiss, New Test-Taking Skill: Working the System, L.A. TIMES, Jan. 9, 2000, at A1
47. Data Across States, KIDS COUNT DATA CENTER, http://datacenter.kidscount. org/data/acrossstates/Rankings.aspx?10ct=2&by=a&order=a&ind= 43&dfm=322&tf=38 (last visited Mar. 18, 2011).
48. DC APPLESEED CTR. & PIPER RUDNICK LLP, A TIME FOR ACTION (2004), available at http://www.dcappleseed.org/library/Special-ed-Rprt.pdf.
49. KELLY HENDERSON, NAT'L ASS'N OF STATE DIRS. OF SPECIAL EDUC, OPTIONAL IDEA ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (2008), available at http://www. directionservice.org/cadre/pdf/ optional%20IDEA%20Alternative%20Dispute%20Resolution.pdf
50. JOY MARKOwrrz ET AL., NAT'L ASS'N OF STATE DIRS. OF SPECIAL EDUC, DISPUTE RESOLUTION (2003), available at http://www.projectforum.org/docs/dispute- resolution.pdf (same).
51. MARTHA MINOW, IN BROWN'S WAKE: LEGACIES OF AMERICA'S EDUCATIONAL LANDMARK 74 (2010).
52. Steven G. Rivkin et al., Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement, 73 ECONOMETRICA 417, 440-41 (2005).
53. Jose Blackorby & Mary Wagner, As Time Goes By: Short-Term Changes in the Experiences of Elementary and Middle School Students with Disabilities, in SEELS: WAVE 1 WAVE 2 OVERVIEW 1-1, 1-2 to 1-5 (2004), available at http://www.seels.net/designdocs/wlw2/SEELS-WlW2-complete-report.pdf.
54. Mary Wagner et al., Who Are Secondary Students in Special Education Today?, 2 NLTS2 DATA BRIEF 1, 2 (2003), available at http://www.ncset.org/ publications/nlts2/NCSETNLTS2Brief-2.1.pdf.
55. William E. Thro, The Third Wave: The Impact of the Montana, Kentucky, and Texas Decisions on the Future of Public School Finance Reform Litigation, 19 J.L. & EDUC. 219 (1990)
56. JAMES E. RYAN, FIVE MILES AWAY, A WORLD APART 150 (2010)
57. Richard Briffault, Adding Adequacy to Equity, in SCHOOL MONEY TRIALS 25, 27, 47 (Martin R. West & Paul E. Peterson eds., 2007)
58. Aaron Saiger, The Last Wave: The Rise of the Contingent School District, 84 N.C. L. REV. 857, 895-96 (2006)
59. William S. Koski & Rob Reich, When "Adequate" Isn't: The Retreat from Equity in Educational IMW and Policy and Why It Matters, 56 EMORY L.J. 545, 595-604 (2006).
60. San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 54-55 (1973).
61. Cf Mark A. Cohen & Paul H. Rubin, Private Enforcement of Public Policy, 3 YALE J. ON REG. 167, 167 n.1 (1985)
62. Molly McUsic, The Use of Education Clauses in School Finance Reform Litigation, 28 HARV.J. ON LEGIS. 307, 320-26 (1991).
63. Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, The Case for a Collaborative Enforcement Model for a Federal Right to Education, 40 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 1653, 1660-67 (2007).
64. N. Kagendo Mutua, Policed Identities: Children with Disabilities, 32 EDUC. STUDIES 289, 292-93, 295 (2001).
65. JOHN FIELD, SOCIAL CAPITAL 82-91 (2d ed. 2008).
66. Marc Galanter, Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, 9 LAW & SocV REV. 95 (1974)
67. RICHARD H. THALER & CASS R. SUNSTEIN, NUDGE 23-24 (2008)
68. generally WRIGHTSLAW, http://www.wrightslaw.com (last visited June 13, 2011)
69. Publications, PARENT INFO. CENTER, http://www.wpic.org/publications.html (last visited June 13, 2011).
70. also Robert H. Mnookin & Lewis Kornhauser, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, 88 YALE LJ. 950, 966 (1979)
71. Jay P. Heubert, Schools Without Rules? Charter Schools, Federal Disability Law, and the Paradoxes of Deregulation, 32 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 301, 321 (1997).
72. generally RICHARD D. KAHLENBERG, ALL TOGETHER NOW (2001)
73. HENRY LEVIN ET AL., THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF AN EXCELLENT EDUCATION FOR ALL OF AMERICA'S CHILDREN 2 (2007)
74. James E. Ryan & Michael Heise, The Political Economy of School Choice, 111 YALE L.J. 2043, 2092 (2002)
75. Monica Costello, Note, Systemic Compliance Complaints: Making IDEA's Enforcement Provisions a Reality, 41 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 507, 513-18 (2008)
76. Julie A. Davies & Lisa M. Bohon, Re-imagining Public Enforcement of Title IX, 2007 BYU EDUC. & L.J. 25, 44 n.99
77. DAVID L. SHAPIRO, FEDERALISM 75-106 (1995)
78. Jane Gross, Paying for a Disability Diagnosis to Gain Time on College Boards, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 26, 2002, at A1
79. D. James Greiner & Cassandra Wolos Pattanayak, Randomized Evaluation in Legal Assistance: Report of a First Study, a Critical Review of the Literature, and Prospects for the Future, 121 YALE L.J. (forthcoming 2011), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=l708664.
80. Julie Davies, Federal Civil Rights Practice in the 1990s: The Dichotomy Between Reality and Theory, 48 HASTINGS LJ. 197, 222-25 (1997).
81. Brief of Amici Curiae Council of Parent Attorneys & Advocates Inc. et al. in Support of Petitioners at 9 n.4, Winkelman v. Parma City Sch. Dist., 550 U.S. 516 (2007) (No. 05-983)
82. Mark C. Weber, Reflections on the New Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 58 FLA. L. REV. 7, 29-30 (2006)
83. Perry A. Zirkel, Impossible Parents?, 84 PHI DELTA KAPPAN 335, 335-336 (2002)
84. Louis S. Rulli & Jason A. Leckerman, Unfinished Business: The Fading Promise of ADA Enforcement in the Federal Courts Under Title I and Its Impact on the Poor, 8 J. GENDER RACE & JUST. 595, 636-39 (2005).
85. Stefan R. Hanson, Buckhannon, Special Education Disputes, and Attorneys' Fees: Time for a Congressional Response Again, 2003 BYU EDUC. & L.J. 519, 541-49
86. Mark C. Weber, Litigation Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act After Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources, 65 OHIO ST. L.J. 357, 360, 370-77 (2004).
87. Andrea F. Blau, Available Dispute Resolution Processes Within the Reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of2004: Where Do Mediation Principles Fit In ?, 7 PEPP. DISP. RESOL. LJ. 65, 74-75 (2007)
88. Steven S. Goldberg, Special Education Mediation: Responding to a Proposal for Reform, 30 J.L. & EDUC. 127, 129-32 (2001)
89. Peter J. Kuriloff & Steven S. Goldberg, Is Mediation a Fair Way to Resolve Special Education Disputes? First Empirical Findings, 2 HARV. NEGOT. L. REV. 35, 60-63 (1997)
90. Stephen Marchese, Putting Square Pegs into Round Holes: Mediation and the Rights of Children with Disabilities Under the IDEA, 53 RUTCERS L. REV. 333, 344-51 (2001)
91. Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 YALE LJ. 1073, 1076-78 (1984)
92. Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Do the "Haves" Come Out Ahead in Alternative fudicial Systems?: Repeat Players in ADR 15 OHIO ST. J. ON DISP. RESOL. 19, 57-61 (1999)
93. Compare Lucht v. Molalla River Sch. Dist., 225 F.3d 1023, 1026-30 (9th Cir. 2000)
94. James R. Newcomer & Perry A. Zirkel, An Analysis of Judicial Outcomes of Special Education Cases, 65 J. EXCEPTIONAL CHILD. 469, 474 (1999)
95. Ashlie D'Errico Surur, Note, Placing the Ball in Congress' Court: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court's Decision in Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 126 S. Ct. 2455 (2006), 27 J. NAT'L ASS'N ADMIN. L. JUDICIARY 547, 598-602 (2007)
96. Leslie Reed, Comment, Is a Free Appropriate Public Education Really Free ? How the Denial of Expert Witness Fees Will Adversely Impact Children with Autism, 45 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 251, 298-302 (2008).
97. Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291, 308-09 (2006)
98. NANCY LEE JONES & CAROL J. TOLAND, CONG. RESEARCH SERV., R 40521, THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA) 1-2, 24 (2009).
99. Settlement Encouragement and Fairness Act, S. 1117, 108th Cong. (2003).
100. James A. Kushner, The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988: The Second Generation of Fair Housing, 42 VAND. L. REV. 1049, 1076-78, 1091 (1989)
101. Robert G. Schwemm, Private Enforcement and the Fair Housing Act, 6 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 375, 379-81 (1988)
102. Marc C. Weber, Damages Liability in Special Education Cases, 21 REV. Lmc 83, 86 (2002)
103. Gregory F. Corbett, Special Education, Equal Protection and Education Finance: Does the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Violate a General Education Student's Fundamental Right to Education?, 40 B.C. L. REV. 633, 634-36 (1999)
104. Gillian Lester, Can Joe the Plumber Support Redistribution? Law, Social Preferences, and Sustainable Policy Design, 64 TAX L. REV. (forthcoming 2011) (manuscript at 5), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1461098.
105. Samuel R. Bagenstos, The Future of Disability Law, 114 YALE LJ. 1, 70-73 (2004).
106. Perry A. Zirkel, Comparison of IDEA IEP's and Sec. 504 Accommodation Plans, 191 EDUC. L. REP. 563 (2004)
107. Perry A. Zirkel, The Substantive Standard for FAPE: Does Section 504 Require Less than the IDEA ?, 106 EDUC. L. REP. 471 (1996)
108. ROBERT A. KAGAN, ADVERSARIAL LEGALISM 3 (2003).
109. ABA Symposium on Access to Justice, 37 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 1 (2010).
110. Pamela H. Bucy, Private Justice, 76 S. CAL. L. REV. 1, 14-15 (2002)
111. TOM R. TYLER, WHY PEOPLE OBEY THE LAW 97, 172-73 (2006)
112. Mathew D. McCubbins & Thomas Schwartz, Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms, 28 AM. J. POL. SCI. 165, 171 (1984)
113. NAT'L COUNCIL ON DISABILITY, BACK TO SCHOOL ON CIML RIGHTS 7, 53 (2000)
114. Thomas Hehir, IDEA and Disproportionality: Federal Enforcement, Effective Advocacy, and Strategies for Change, in RACIAL INEQUITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
115. Arun K. Ramanathan, Paved with Good Intentions: The Federal Role in the Oversight and Enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), 110 TEACHERS COLL. REC. 278, 290 (2008).
116. Jeremy Rabkin, Office for Civil Rights, in THE POLITICS OF REGULATION 304, 340-42 (James Q. Wilson ed., 1980)
117. Rural Education in America, NAT'L CENTER EDUC. STATS., http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/TablesHTML/51ocaledistricts.asp (last visited June 13, 2011).
118. Cass R. Sunstein, Informational Regulation and Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond, 147 U. PA. L. REV. 613, 618 (1999)
119. Ruth Colker, Winning and Losing Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 62 OHIO ST. LJ. 239, 244-47 (2001)
120. James S. Liebman & Charles F. Sabel, A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform, 28 N.Y.U. REV. L. & Soc. CHANGE 183, 240-43 (2003)
121. Louis S. Rulli, Employment Discrimination Litigation Under the ADA from the Perspective of the Poor: Can the Promise of Title I Be Fulfilled for Low-Income Workers in the Next Decade?, 9 TEMP. POL. & Crv. RTS. L. REV. 345, 359-77 (2000)
122. Anna B. Duff, How Special Education Policy Affects Districts, in RETHINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR A NEW CENTURY
123. Sheryl Gay Stolberg, On First Day, Obama Quickly Sets New Tone, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 21, 2009, at A1
124. About, DATA.GOV, http://www.data.gov/about (last visited June 13, 2011)
125. Catherine Gewertz, 9th Grade, By the Numbers, EDUC. WK., Mar. 11, 2009, at 26
126. Sarah D. Sparks, Data Mining Gets Traction in Education, EDUC. WK., Jan. 12, 2011
127. Sarah D. Sparks, States Making Great Progress on Student-Data Systems, Report Finds, EDUC. WK., Feb. 16, 2011.
128. Greenwich, Connecticut, CITY-DATA.COM, http://www.city-data.com/city/ Greenwich-Connecticut.html (last visited Apr. 17, 2011))
129. David J. Hoff, National Standards Gain Steam, EDUC. WK., Mar. 4, 2009, at 1
130. Alyson Klein, Effect of Stimulus on NCIJi Renewal Mulled, EDUC. WK., Mar. 11, 2009, at 24.
131. COMM'N ON NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND, BEYOND NCLB 142 (2007).
132. Paul Ohm, Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, 57 UCLA L. REV. 1701, 1764-69 (2010).
133. Sarah D. Sparks, Help Offered on Guarding Student Privacy in School Data, EDUC. WK., NOV. 10, 2010.
134. Sharona Hoffman & Andy Podgurski, In Sickness, Health, and Cyberspace: Protecting the Security of Electronic Private Health Information, 48 B.C. L. REV. 331, 344-84 (2007).
135. ROBERT V. PERCIVAL ET AL., ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION 1012 (6th ed. 2009).
136. NEIL GUNNINGHAM & PETER GRABOSKY WITH DARREN SINCLAIR, SMART REGULATION 430 (1998).
137. Theresa Glennon, Evaluating the Office for Civil Rights' Minority and Special Education Project, in RACIAL INEQUITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
138. Juan Gonzalez, Class System in the City's Schools: Special-Ed Help Goes Mostly to the Rich, N.Y. DAILY NEWS, Dec. 15, 2010, at 6
139. Derrick A. Bell, Jr., Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma, 93 HARV. L. REV. 518, 523 (1980).
140. Marguerite Roza & Paul T. Hill, How Within-District Spending Inequities Help Some Schools to Fail, in BROOKINGS PAPERS ON EDUCATION POLICY 201, 213-16 (Diane Ravitch ed., 2004)
141. Marguerite Roza et al., Strengthening Title I to Help High Poverty Schools: How Title I Funds Fit into District Allocation Patterns 5-6 (Aug. 18, 2005)
142. LINDSEY LUEBCHOW, EQUITABLE RESOURCES IN LOW INCOME SCHOOLS (2009), available at http://education.newamerica.net/site/newamerica.net/files/ policydocs/Equitable-Resources-Low-Incorne-Schools.pdf
143. THE EDUCATION TRUST-WEST, CALIFORNIA'S HIDDEN TEACHER SPENDING GAP (2005), available at http://www.hiddengap.org/resources/report031105.pdf
144. Alyson Klein, Lawmakers Introduce Bill Aimed at "Fiscal Fairness, " EDUC. WK: POLITICS K-12 (Mar. 31, 2011, 3:36 PM), http://blogs.edweek. org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2011/03/salary-comparability-could-fin.html?qs= salary+comparability
145. Alyson Klein, Salary Comparability: Coming to an ESEA Bill Near You?, EDUC. WK.: POLITICS K-12 (Oct. 4, 2010, 2:44 PM), http://biogs.edweek.org/ edweek/campaign-k-12/2010/10/salary-comparability-coming-so.html.
146. DAVID C. THOMPSON ET AL., MONEY AND SCHOOLS 89 (4th ed. 2008).
147. Gillian E. Metzger, The Interdependent Relationship Between Internal and External Separation of Powers, 59 EMORY LJ. 423, 429 (2009)
148. U.S. DEP'T OF EDUC, ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS OF THE OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS 3 (2008).
149. Perry A. Zirkel,'Transaction Costs' and the IDEA, EDUC. WK., May 21, 2003, at 34.
150. Jennifer Cohen, Congress Close to Finalizing Fiscal Year 2011 Appropriations, ED MONEY WATCH (April 12, 2011), http://edmoney.newamerica.net/ blogposts/2011/congress-close-to-finalizing-fiscal-year-201l-appropriations- 48348
151. James E. Ryan, The Tenth Amendment and Other Paper Tigers: The Legal Boundaries of Education Governance, in WHO'S IN CHARGE HERE? 42 (Noel Epstein ed., 2004)
152. Michael J. Jackonis et al., War, Its Aftermath, and U.S. Health Policy: Toward a Comprehensive Health Program for America's Military Personnel, Veterans, and Their Families, 36 J.L. MED. & ETHICS 677 (2008)
153. Elizabeth F. Emens, Integrating Accommodation, 156 U. PA. L. REV. 839 (2008)
154. Martha Minow, Learning to Live with the Dilemma of Difference: Bilingual and Special Education, 48 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 157, 208 (1985)