The impact of perceived cognitive effectiveness on perceived usefulness of visual conceptual modeling languages

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6998 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 78-91

  Figl, Kathrin ^a   Derntl, Michael ^b  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL MODELING LANGUAGES; DISCRIMINABILITY; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; MODELING LANGUAGES; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; USER PERCEPTIONS; USER RATING; USERS' PERCEPTION; VISUAL MODELING LANGUAGES;

E-LEARNING;

DATA MINING;

EID: 80455123797     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requirements Engineering 9(4), 248-260 (2004)
2. Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: Current state and future directions. Data and Knowledge Engineering 15(3), 243-276 (2005)
3. Boot, E.W., Nelson, J., van Merriënboer, J., Gibbons, A.S.: Stratification, elaboration, and formalization of design documents: Effects on the production of instructional materials. British Journal of Educational Technology 38(5), 917-933 (2007)
4. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., Lyytinen, K.: Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
5. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M.: Do ontological deficiencies in modeling grammars matter. Management Information Systems Quarterly 35(1) (2011)
6. Sonderegger, A., Sauer, J.: The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics 41(3), 403-410 (2010)
7. Moody, D.L.: The physics of notations: Towards a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35(5), 756-779 (2009)
8. Moody, D.L., Heymans, P., Matulevicius, R.: Improving the effectiveness of visual representations in requirements engineering: An evaluation of i* visual syntax. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2009, pp. 171-180. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2009)
9. Moody, D., Hillegersberg, J.: Software Language Engineering, pp. 16-34. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
10. Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 visual notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 377-396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
11. Figl, K., Mendling, J., Strembeck, M., Recker, J.: On the cognitive effectiveness of routing symbols in process modeling languages. In: Aalst, W., Mylopoulos, J., Rosemann, M., Shaw, M.J., Szyperski, C., Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R. (eds.) BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 47, pp. 230-241. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
12. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
13. Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner. How professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London, UK (1983)
14. Object Management Group: Unified Modeling Language (UML) 2.3 (2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.3/
15. Cao, L., Ramesh, B., Rossi, M.: Are domain-specific models easier to maintain than uml models? IEEE Software 26(4), 19-21 (2009)
16. Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasley, S.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127-149. American Psychological Association, Hyattsville (1991)
17. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language - Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)
18. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R.E., Vlissides, J.: Design patterns: Abstraction and reuse of object-oriented design. In: European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP), Kaiserslautern, Germany, pp. 406-431 (1993)
19. Derntl, M., Botturi, L.: Essential use cases for pedagogical patterns. Computer Science Education 16(2), 137-156 (2006)
20. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw. 11, 42-49 (1994)
21. Maes, A., Poels, G.: Evaluating quality of conceptual modelling scripts based on user perceptions. Data & Knowledge Engineering 63(3), 701-724 (2007)
22. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jorgensen, H.D.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. European Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 91-102 (2006)
23. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340 (1989)
24. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11(1), 65-100 (1987)
25. McDougall, S.J.P., Curry, M.B., Bruijn, O.D.: Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: Norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31(3), 487-519 (1999)
26. Kelly, S., Pohjonen, R.: Worst practices for domain-specific modeling. IEEE Software 26(4), 22-29 (2009)
27. Derntl, M., Parrish, P., Botturi, L.: Beauty and precision: Weaving complex educational technology projects with visual instructional design languages. International Journal on E-Learning 9(2), 185-202 (2010)
28. Gibbons, A.S., Brewer, E.: Elementary principles of design languages and design notation systems for instructional design. In: Spector, M., Wiley, D. (eds.) Innovations to Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (2004)
29. Rawlings, A., van Rosmalen, P., Koper, R., M., Rodrguez Artacho, M., Lefrere, P.: Cen/isss ws/lt learning technologies workshop - survey of educational modelling languages (emls) (2002), http://www.eifel.org/ publications/standards/ elearning-standard/cenissslt/emlsurvey
30. Botturi, L.: E2ML: A visual language for the design of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 54(3), 265-293 (2006)
31. Caeiro-Rodríguez, M.: PoEML: A separation-of-concerns proposal to Instructional Design. In: Botturi, L., Stubbs, T. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Languages in Instructional Design: Theories and Practices, pp. 185-209. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2008)
32. Derntl, M., Motschnig-Pitrik, R.: coUML - A Visual Language for Modeling Cooperative Environments. In: Botturi, L., Stubbs, T. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices, pp. 155-184. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2008)