Ethics and Integrity in the Publishing Process: Myths, Facts, and a Roadmap

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 397-406

  Schminke, Marshall ^a   Ambrose, Maureen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Integrity; Professionalism; Publishing; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255137052     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00248.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Aguinis, H., & Vaschetto, S. J. 2011. Editorial responsibility: Managing the publishing process to do good and do well. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
2. Chen, X.-P. 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
3. Kirkman, B. L., & Chen, G. 2011. Maximizing your data or data slicing? Recommendations for managing multiple submissions from the same dataset. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
4. Kulik, C. T. 2011. Climbing the higher mountain: The challenges of multilevel, multisource, and longitudinal research designs. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
5. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. 2011. Working in research teams: Lessons from personal experiences. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
6. Leung, K. 2011. Presenting post hoc hypotheses as a priori: Ethical and theoretical issues. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
7. Mowday, R. T. 2011. Elevating the dialogue on professional ethics to the next level: Reflections on the experience of the Academy of Management. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
8. Rupp, D. E. 2011. Ethical issues faced by editors and reviewers. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).
9. Wright, T. A. 2011. And justice for all: Our research participants considered as valued stakeholders. Management and Organization Review, 7(3).