Ethical Issues Faced by Editors and Reviewers

Management and Organization Review

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 481-493

  Rupp, Deborah E ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Editors; Ethics; Journals; Publishing; Reviewers; Reviewing

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255138332     PISSN: 17408776     EISSN: 17408784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00227.x     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. Academy of Management 2006. Code of ethics. [Last accessed 20 March 2011.] Available from URL:
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & American Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. American Sociological Association 1999. ASA Cod of Ethics. [Last accessed 20 March 2011.] Available from URL:
4. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2): 81-105.
5. Chen, X. P. 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 423-432.
6. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 1995. On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
7. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. H. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52: 281-302.
8. Feldman, D. C. 2005. Writing and reviewing as sadomasochistic rituals. Journal of Management, 31(3): 325-329.
9. Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. 2007. Making a life in the field of organization science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7): 817-835.
10. von Glinow, M. A., & Novelli, L. 1982. Ethical standards within organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2): 417-436.
11. Hinkin, T. R. 1995. A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5): 967-988.
12. Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 104-121.
13. Hollenbeck, J. R., & Mannor, M. J. 2007. Career success and weak paradigms: The role of activity, resiliency, and true scores. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8): 933-942.
14. International Association for Chinese Management Research. 2011. Commitment to excellence statement. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 181-184.
15. International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. 2009. Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3): 243-253.
16. Kerr, N. L. 1998. HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3): 196-217.
17. Landy, F. 1986. Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing. American Psychologist, 41(11): 1183-1192.
18. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. 2011. Working in research teams: Lessons from personal experience. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 461-469.
19. Lefkowitz, J. 2003. Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates.
20. Lefkowitz, J. 2008. To prosper, organizational psychology should expand its values to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(4): 439-453.
21. Lefkowitz, J. 2010. Ethics in industrial-organizational psychology. In S. Knapp, L. VandeCreek, M. Gottlieb & M. Handelsman (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology: in press. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Leung, K. 2011. Presenting post hoc hypotheses as a priori: Ethical and theoretical issues. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 471-479.
23. Locke, E. A. 2007. The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33(6): 867-890.
24. Lowman, R. L. 2006. The ethical practice of psychology in organizations (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Messick, S. 1998. Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45(1-3): 35-44.
26. Messick, S. 2000. Consequences of test interpretation and use: The fusion of validity and values in psychological assessment. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy: 3-20. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
27. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
28. Schuler, H. 1993. Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In H. Schuler, J. L. Farr, & M. Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: 11-26. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
30. Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011. SIOP program reviewer rating guidelines. [Last accessed 20 March 2011.] Available from URL: