Pluralism, academic freedom, and heterodox economics

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 562-572

  Garnett, Robert F ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

academic freedom; economics education; heterodox economics; intellectual freedom; pluralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155182863     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: 15528502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613411402647     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). General declaration of principles. New York: Columbia University; 1915:.
2. American Association of University Professors (AAUP), Statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure. Washington, DC:; 1940:.
3. American Association of University Professors (AAUP), Joint statement on rights and freedoms of students. Washington, DC:; 1967:.
4. American Association of University Professors (AAUP), Statement of professional ethics. Washington, DC:; 1987:.
5. American Association of University Professors (AAUP), Freedom in the classroom.Academe. 2007;93 (5): 54-61.
6. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U). Academic freedom and educational responsibility. Washington, DC:; 2006:.
7. Backhouse R. E.Pluralism and the economic journal.History of Economics Ideas. 1994;2 (3): 109-17.
8. Backhouse R. E. On the credentials of methodological pluralism. Economics broadly considered: Essays in honor of Warren J. Samuels. Biddle J. E.Davis J. B.Medema S. G., ed. London: Routledge; 2001:161-81.
9. Boettke P. J.Obituary: Don Lavoie (1950-2001).Journal of Economic Methodology. 2004;11 (3): 377-79.
10. BoettkeP. J.Methodological pluralism and the Austrian school of economics?http://austrianeconomists.typepad.com/weblog/2007/12/methodological.html (accessed November 18, 2009).
11. Opening up economics. The crisis in economics. The post-autistic economics movement: The first 600 days. Fullbrook E., ed. London: Routledge; 2003:36-8.
12. Coats A. W. Economists, the economics profession, and academic freedom in the United States. Academic freedom on trial. Hansen W. L., ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison; 1998:124-54.
13. Colander D. The invisible hand of truth. The spread of economic ideas. Colander D.Coats A. W., ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989:31-6.
14. Colander D. Moving beyond the rhetoric of pluralism: Suggestions for an 'inside-the mainstream' heterodoxy. Economic pluralism. Garnett R.Olsen E. K.Starr M., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:36-47.
15. Colander D.,Holt R. P. F.,Rosser J. B.The changing face of mainstream economics.Review of Political Economy. 2004;16 (October): 485-99.
16. Davidson P.A response to King's arguments for pluralism.Post-Autistic Economics Review. 2004;24:.
17. Davis J. B.The turn in economics: Neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?.Journal of Institutional Economics. 2006;2 (1): 1-20.
18. Davis J. B. Heterodox economics, the fragmentation of the mainstream, and embedded individual analysis. Future directions for heterodox economics. Harvey J. T.Garnett R. F., ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2008:53-72.
19. De Langhe R. Why should I adopt pluralism?. Economic pluralism. Garnett R.Olsen E. K.Starr M., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:87-98.
20. Dewey J.John Dewey: The middle works, 1899-1924. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press; 1976:.
21. Donovan G.Economics split divides Notre Dame.National Catholic Reporter. 2004;:9.
22. Dow S. C.The relevance of controversies for practice as well as teaching.Post-Autistic Economics Review. 2001;6:.
23. Fellman D.Dictionary of the history of ideas. Charlottesville, VA: Gale Group; 2003:9-17.
24. Fleischacker S. F.A third concept of liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999:.
25. Foster J. F.Freedom and license in higher education.Journal of Economic Issues. 1981;15 (4): 969-73.
26. Freeman A.,Kliman A.Beyond talking the talk: Toward a critical pluralist stance.Post-Autistic Economics Review. 2006;40:.
27. Fullbrook E.Real science is pluralist.Post-Autistic Economics Review. 2001;5:.
28. Garnett R. F.Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics.Review of Political Economy. 2006;18 (Fall): 521-46.
29. Garnett R. F.Liberal learning as freedom: A capabilities approach to undergraduate education.Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2009;28 (5): 437-47.
30. Garnett R. F.,Butler M. R.Should economics educators care about students' academic freedom?.International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education. 2009;1 (1 and 2): 148-60.
31. Harpham E. J.The problem of liberty in the thought of Adam Smith.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000;22 (2): 217-37.
32. Haskell T. L. Justifying the rights of academic freedom in the era of 'power/knowledge'. The future of academic freedom. Menand L., ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996:43-92.
33. Hausman D. M.,McPherson M. S.Standards.Economics and Philosophy. 1988;4 (1): 1-7.
34. Hodgson G. M.,Mäki U.,McCloskey D. N.Plea for a pluralistic and rigorous economics.American Economic Review. 1992;82 (May): xxv.
35. Holcombe R. G.Pluralism versus heterodoxy in economics and the social sciences.Journal of Philosophical Economics. 2008;1 (2): 51-72.
36. Holmes S.,Sunstein C. R.The cost of rights: Why liberty depends on taxes. New York: W. W. Norton; 1999:.
37. Kellert S. H. Disciplinary pluralism for science studies. Scientific pluralism. Kellert S.Longino H.Waters K., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2006:215-230.
38. Scientific pluralism. Kellert S. H.Longino H. E.Waters C. K., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2006:.
39. Krueger A. O., et al.Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics.Journal of Economic Literature. 1991;29 (3): 1035-53.
40. Lavoie D.The 'objectivity' of scholarship and the ideal of the university.Advances in Austrian Economics part. 1995;2:371-403.
41. Lee F. S. Pluralism in heterodox economics. Economic pluralism. Garnett R.Olsen E. K.Starr M., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:19-35.
42. Lee F. S.The pluralism debate in heterodox economics.Review of Radical Political Economics. 2011;43 (4): 540-51.
43. Lovejoy A. Academic freedom. Encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. I. Seligman E. R. A., ed. New York: MacMillan; 1937:384-87.
44. Marqués G.,Weisman D. Is Kuhnian incommensurability a good basis for pluralism in economics?. Economic pluralism. Garnett R.Olsen E. K.Starr M., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:74-86.
45. McCloskey D. N.Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994:.
46. McCloskey D. N.The rhetoric of economics. 1998. The rhetoric of economics, 2nd ed.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1998:.
47. Mirowski P. The attribution of quantitative error and the erasure of plural interpretations in various sciences Pluralism in economics. Salanti A.Screpanti E., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 1997:260-77.
48. Nelson C. E. Skewered on the unicorn's horn: The illusion of a tragic tradeoff between content and critical thinking in the teaching of science. Enhancing critical thinking in the sciences. Crow L. W., ed. Washington, DC: Society of College Science Teachers; 1989:17-27.
49. Nussbaum M.Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1997:.
50. Paul R. Critical thinking, moral integrity, and citizenship: Teaching for the intellectual virtues. The social worlds of higher education. Pescosolido A.Aminzade R., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 1999:128-36.
51. Perry W. G.Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1970:.
52. Scott J. Academic freedom as an ethical practice. The future of academic freedom. Menand L., ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996:163-86.
53. Sen A. K. Human rights and Asian values. Sixteenth Morgenthau Memorial Lecture on Ethics and Foreign Policy. New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs; 1997:.
54. Sen A. K.Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books; 1999:.
55. Sent E.-M.Pleas for pluralism.Post-Autistic Economics Review. 2003;18:.
56. Simonetti R. The Impact of the economics benchmarking statement on pluralism in economics teaching in the UK. Teaching pluralism in economics. Groenewegen J., ed. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar; 2007:104-22.
57. Smith A.An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Campbell R. H.Skinner A. S., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1976 [1776]:.
58. Stock W. A.,Hansen W. L.Ph.D. program learning and job demands: How close is the match?.American Economic Review. 2004;94 (2): 266-71.
59. Strassmann D. L. Not a free market: The rhetoric of disciplinary authority in economics. Beyond economic man. Ferber M.Nelson J., ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993:54-68.
60. Tool M. R.An institutionalist legacy.Journal of Economic Issues. 1989;23 (2): 327-36.
61. U.S. Supreme Court. 1967. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of New York, 385 U.S.589, 603.
62. Van Bouwel J.Explanatory pluralism in economics: Against the mainstream?.Philosophical Explorations. 2004;7 (3): 299-315.