The pluralism debate in heterodox economics

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 540-551

  Lee, Frederic S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

academic freedom; blasphemy; heresy; heterodox economics; intellectual pluralism; pluralism; theoretical monism; theoretical pluralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455190875     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: 15528502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613411402643     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Backhouse R. E.Progress in heterodox economics.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000;22 (2): 149-55.
2. Backhouse R. E.A suggestion for clarifying the study of dissent in economics.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2004;26 (2): 261-71.
3. Backhouse R. E.Robbins and welfare economics: A reappraisal.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2009;31 (4): 474-84.
4. Backhouse R. E.,Medema S. G.Defining economics: The long road to acceptance of Robbins's definition.Economica. 2009a;76:805-20.
5. Backhouse R. E.Robbins's Essay and the axiomatization of economics.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2009b;31 (4): 485-99.
6. Backhouse R. E.On the definition of economics.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2009c;23 (1): 221-33.
7. Bernstein M. A. The pitfalls of mainstream economic reasoning (and teaching). A guide to what's wrong with economics. Fullbrook E., ed. London: Anthem Press; 2004:33-40.
8. Carrington P. D.Freedom and community in the academy.Texas Law Review. 1988;66 (7): 1577-89.
9. Coats A. W.Roundtable: The progress of heterodox economics.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000;22 (2): 145-48.
10. Coats A. W. Reflections on the progress of heterodox economics. Evolution and path dependence in economic ideas. Garrouste P.Ioannides S., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2001:225-38.
11. Colander D.,Holt R. P. F.,Rosser J. B.The changing face of mainstream economics.Review of Political Economy. 2004;16 (4): 485-99.
12. Davidson P.Setting the record straight on A history of post Keynesian economics.Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2003-4;26 (2): 245-72.
13. Davis J. Comment. Pluralism in economics. Salanti A.Screpanti E., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 1997:207-11.
14. Davis J.The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2008;32 (2): 349-66.
15. Desai M. The underworld of economics: Heresy and heterodoxy in economic thought. Economics, culture and education: Essays in honour of Mark Blaug. Shaw G. K., ed. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar; 1991:53-63.
16. Dow S. Heterodox economics: A common challenge to mainstream eonomics?. Money, distribution and economic policy: Alternatives to orthodox macroeconomics. Hein E.Truger A., ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007:31-46.
17. Fontana G.,Gerrard B.The future of post Keynesian economics.Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 2006;59:49-80.
18. Fulbrook M.Historical theory. London: Routledge; 2002:.
19. Fusfeld D. R.Comments on the roundtable discussion: The progress of heterodox economics.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000;22 (2): 171-77.
20. Garnett R. F.Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics.Review of Political Economy. 2006;18 (4): 521-46.
21. Giere R. N. Perspective pluralism. Scientific pluralism. Kellert S. H.Longino H. E.Waters C. K., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2006:26-41.
22. Goodwin C. D.Comment: It's the homogeneity, stupid!.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000;22 (2): 179-83.
23. Haskell T. L.Objectivity is not neutrality: Explanatory schemes in history. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998:.
24. Economics and its discontents: Twentieth century dissenting economists. Holt R. P. F.Pressman S., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 1998:.
25. Kellert S. H., Introduction: The pluralist stance. Longino H. E.,Waters C. K.Scientific pluralism. Kellert S. H.Longino H. E.Waters C. K., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2006:vii-xxiv.
26. Kern W. S.The heterodox economics of 'the most orthodox of orthodox economists': Frank H. Knight.The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 1997;56:319-30.
27. Lee F. S.Conference of Socialist Economists and the emergence of heterodox economics in post-war Britain.Capital and Class. 2001;75:15-39.
28. Lee F. S.The ranking game, class, and scholarship in American mainstream economics.Australasian Journal of Economics Education. 2006;3 (1-2): 1-41.
29. Lee F. S.A history of heterodox economics: Challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century. London: Routledge; 2009:.
30. Lee F. S.,Elsner W.Publishing, ranking, and the future of heterodox economics.On the Horizon. 2008;16:176-84.
31. Levy L. W.Blasphemy: Verbal offense against the sacred from Moses to Salman Rushdie. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1993:.
32. Liebhafsky H. H.The rational consumer's demand for psychiatric help: A preference function generating a perfectly price-inelastic demand function.Journal of Political Economy. 1972;80 (4): 829-32.
33. The margins of orthodoxy: Heterodox writings and cultural response, 1660-1750. Lund R. D., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995a:.
34. Lund R. D.Irony as subversion: Thomas Woolston and the crime of wit. The margins of orthodoxy: Heterodox writings and cultural response, 1660-1750. Lund R. D., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995b:170-94.
35. Mata T. J. F.London School of Economics and Political Science; 2005:.
36. Nash D.Blasphemy in modern Britain, 1789 to the present. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 1999:.
37. Rabban D. M.Does academic freedom limit faculty autonomy?.Texas Law Review. 1988;66 1 (7): 405-30.
38. Robbins L.An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. 1969. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science, 2nd ed.London: Macmillan.London: Macmillan; 1969:.
39. Robertson D. H.,Sraffa P.,Shove G. F.Increasing returns and the representative firm.Economic Journal. 1930;40 (1): 79-116.
40. SentE.-M.2003. Plea for pluralism. Post-Austistic Economics Review18, article 1 (February4): 1-4. http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue18.htm.
41. Sent E.-M. Pluralisms in economics. Scientific pluralism. Kellert S. H.Longino H. E.Waters C. K., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2006:80-101.
42. Stiglitz J. E.,Walsh C. E.Principles of microeconomics. 2002. Principles of microeconomics, 3rd ed.New York: W. W. Norton and Company.New York: W. W. Norton and Company; 2002:.
43. Van Bouwel J.Explanatory pluralism in economics: Against the mainstream?.Philosophical Explorations. 2004;7 (3): 299-315.
44. Van BouwelJ.2005. Towards a framework for pluralism in economics. Post-Autistic Economics Review30 (March21): 24-27. http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue30.htm.
45. Veblen T.Why is economics not an evolutionary science.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1898;12 (4): 373-97.
46. Vromen J. In praise of moderate plurality. Teaching pluralism in economics. Groenewegen J., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2007:64-94.
47. Wrenn M. V.Colorado State University; 2004:.