The legal complex

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2011, Pages 217-236

  Karpik, Lucien ^a   Halliday, Terence C ^b  

^a ÉCOLE DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES   (France)

^b AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

collective action; lawyers; markets; Political liberalism; rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 80155159978     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105512     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Abbott A. 1986. Jurisdictional conflicts: a new approach to the development of legal professions. Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 1986(2): 187-224
2. Abbott A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
3. Abel RL. 1988. The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
4. Abel RL. 2007. Contesting legality in the United States after September 11. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 361-402
5. Abel RL, Lewis PSC, eds. 1988a. Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
6. Abel RL, Lewis PSC, eds. 1988b. Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
7. Aziz S. 2012. Liberal protagonists? The lawyers movement in Pakistan. See Halliday et al. 2012
8. Barzilai G. 2007. The ambivalent language of lawyers in Israel: liberal politics, economic liberalism, silence, and dissent. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 247-80
9. Bell DA. 1994. Lawyers and Citizens: The Making of a Political Elite in Old Regime France. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
10. Bell DA. 1997. Barristers, politics, and the failure of civil society in Old Regime France. SeeHalliday&Karpik 1997a, pp. 65-100
11. Block-Lieb S, Halliday TC. 2007. Incrementalisms in global lawmaking. Brooklyn J. Int. Law XXXII: 851-903
12. Brinks DM. 2008. The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
13. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 1998. Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Couso JA. 2007. When the "political complex" takes the lead: the configuration of a moderate state in Chile. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 315-44
15. De R. 2012. Emasculating the executive: the federal court and civil liberties in late colonial India, 1942-44. See Halliday et al. 2012
16. Elkins Z, Ginsburg T, Melton J. 2009. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
17. Epp CR. 2012. The legal complex in the struggle to control police brutality in India. See Halliday et al. 2012
18. Feeley MM. 2012. Judges and company: courts, constitutionalism and the legal complex. See Halliday et al. 2012
19. Feeley MM, Miyazawa S. 2007. The state, civil society, and the legal complex in modern Japan: continuity and change. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 151-92
20. Ghias SA. 2012. Miscarriage of Chief Justice: lawyers, media, and the struggle for judicial independence in Pakistan. See Halliday et al. 2012
21. Ginsburg T. 2002. Economic analysis and the design of constitutional courts. Theor. Inq. Law 3: 49-86
22. Ginsburg T. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
23. Ginsburg T. 2007. Law and the liberal transformation of the Northeast Asian legal complex in Korea and Taiwan. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 43-64
24. Gould J. 2012. Postcolonial liberalism and the legal complex in Zambia: elegy or triumph? See Halliday et al. 2012
25. Guarnieri C. 2007. Lawyers and statist liberalisms in Italy. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 439-62
26. Halliday TC. 1982. The idiom of legalism in bar politics: lawyers, McCarthyism, and the civil rights era. Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 7: 911-89
27. Halliday TC. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
28. Halliday TC. 2010a. "The conscience of society?" The legal complex, religion, and the fates of political liberalism. In The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice, ed. S Cummings, pp. 50-67. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
29. Halliday TC. 2010b. The fight for basic legal freedoms: mobilization by the legal complex. In Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law, ed. JJ Heckman, RL Nelson, L Cabatingan, pp. 210-40. London/New York: Routledge
30. Halliday TC. 2011. Why the legal complex is integral to theories of judicial power. In How Courts Evolve: Judicial Roles in Comparative Perspective, ed. G Silverstein, RA Kagan, D Kapiszewski. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
31. Halliday TC, Block-Lieb S, Carruthers BG. 2009. Rhetorical legitimation: global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations. Eur. Soc. Econ. Rev. 8: 1-36
32. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
33. Halliday TC, Karpik L, eds. 1997a. Lawyers and the Rise ofWestern Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries. Oxford Clarendon
34. Halliday TC, Karpik L. 1997b. Politics matter: a comparative theory of lawyers in the making of political liberalism. See Halliday & Karpik 1997a, pp. 15-64
35. Halliday TC, Karpik L. 1997c. Postscript: lawyers, political liberalism, and globalization. See Halliday & Karpik 1997a, pp. 349-70
36. Halliday TC, Karpik L. 2012. Political liberalism in the British post-colony: a theme with three variations. See Halliday et al. 2012
37. Halliday TC, Karpik L, Feeley MM, eds. 2007a. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex for Political Change. Oxford: Hart
38. Halliday TC, Karpik L, Feeley MM. 2007b. The legal complex and struggles for political liberalism. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 1-42
39. Halliday TC, Karpik L, Feeley MM, eds. 2012. Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
40. Halliday TC, Liu S. 2007. Birth of a liberal moment? Looking through a one-way mirror at lawyers defense of criminal defendants in China. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 65-108
41. Harding A, Whiting A. 2012. Custodian of civil liberties and justice in Malaysia: the Malaysian bar and the moderate state. See Halliday et al. 2012
42. Hilbink L. 2007. Politicising law to liberalise politics: anti-Francoist judges and prosecutors in Spains democratic transition. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 403-38
43. Jones C. 2007. Dissolving the people: capitalism, law and democracy in Hong Kong. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 109-50
44. Karpik L. 1988. Lawyers and politics in France, 1814-1950: the state, the market and the public. Law Soc. Inq. 13: 707-36
45. Karpik L. 1997. Builders of liberal society: French lawyers and politics. See Halliday & Karpik 1997a, pp. 101-23
46. Karpik L. 1999. French Lawyers: A Study in Collective Action, 1274 to 1994. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
47. Transl. 1995. Les Avocats entre le marché et lEtat. Paris: Gallimard
48. Karpik L. 2007. Postscript: political lawyering. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 463-94
49. Karpik L. 2008. Les professions libérales sont-elles solubles dans le marché? In Action publique et légitimités professionnelles, ed. T Le Bianic, A Vion, pp. 279-88. Paris: LGDJ
50. Larson MS. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
51. Ledford KF. 1996. From General Estate to Special Interest: German Lawyers 1878-1933. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
52. Ledford KF. 1997. Lawyers and the limits of liberalism: theGerman bar in theWeimar Republic. SeeHalliday & Karpik 1997a, pp. 229-64
53. Liu S. 2011. Lawyers, state officials, and significant others: symbiotic exchange in the Chinese legal services market. China Q. 206: 276-93
54. Liu S, Halliday TC. 2011. Political liberalism and political embeddedness: understanding politics in the work of Chinese criminal defense lawyers. Law Soc. Rev. In press
55. Massoud M. 2012. Lawyers and the disintegration of the legal complex in Sudan. See Halliday et al. 2012
56. Mate M. 2012. Priests in the Temple of Justice: the Indian legal complex and the basic structure doctrine. See Halliday et al. 2012
57. Moustafa T. 2007a. Mobilising the law in an authoritarian state: the legal complex in contemporary Egypt. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 193-218
58. Moustafa T. 2007b. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
59. Munir D. 2012. From judicial autonomy to regime transformation: the role of the lawyers movement in Pakistan. See Halliday et al. 2012
60. Perdomo RP. 2007. Lawyers and political liberalism in Venezuela. See Halliday et al. 2007a, pp. 345-60
61. Pue WW. 1997. Lawyers and political liberalism in eighteenth-and nineteenth-century England. SeeHalliday & Karpik 1997a, pp. 167-206
62. Rajah J. 2011. Punishing bodies, securing the nation: how rule of law can legitimate the urbane authoritarian state. Law Soc. Inq. In press
63. Rajah J. 2012a. Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislating Illiberalism in Singapore. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
64. Rajah J. 2012b. Lawyers, politics and publics: state management of lawyers and legitimacy in Singapore. See Halliday et al. 2012
65. Scheppele KL. 2003. Constitutional negotiations: political contexts of judicial activism in post-Soviet Europe. Int. Sociol. 18: 219-38 (Pubitemid 36420816)
66. Udagama D. 2012. The Sri Lankan legal complex and the liberal project: only thus far and no more. See Halliday et al. 2012
67. United NationsComm. Int. TradeLaw (UNCITRAL). 1999.UNCITRALModel Law onCross-Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment. New York: United Nations
68. United Nations Comm. Int. Trade Law (UNCITRAL). 2004. UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency. New York: United Nations
69. VonDoepp P. 2012. Legal complexes and the fight for political liberalism in New African democracies: comparative insights from Malawi, Zambia and Namibia. See Halliday et al. 2012
70. Widner JA. 2001. Building the Rule of Law. New York: Norton