Heterodox economics: History and prospects

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1151-1165

  Dow, Sheila C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heterodox economics; History of economics

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC HISTORY; ECONOMIC THEORY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE;

EID: 80155124207     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/ber017     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Function of Science, London, Routledge
2. Bigo, V. 2006. Open and closed systems and the Cambridge School, Review of Social Economy, vol. 64, no. 4, 493-514
3. Chick, V. 1995. 'Order out of Chaos' in economics? in Dow, S. C. and Hillard, J. (eds), Keynes, Knowledge and Uncertainty, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
4. Chick, V. and Dow, S. C. 2005. The meaning of open systems, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 12, no. 3, 361-81
5. Colander, D. 2000. New millennium economics: how did it get this way, and what way is it?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, 121-32
6. Colander, D., Holt, R. and Rosser, B. 2004. The changing face of mainstream economics, Review of Political Economy, vol. 16, no. 4, 485-99
7. Davis, J. B. 1999. Postmodernism and identity conditions for closure, in Garnett, R. F. (ed.), What Do Economists Know?, London, Routledge
8. Davis, J. B. 2008. The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 32, no. 3, 349-66
9. Davis, J. B. 2009. The nature of heterodox economics, pp. 20-39, in Fullbrook, E. (ed.), Ontology and Economics, Tony Lawson and his Critics, London, Routledge
10. Dequech, D. 2007. Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 30, no. 2, 279-302
11. Dow, S. C. 1985. Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
12. Dow, S. C. 1990. Beyond dualism, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, 143-58
13. Dow, S. C. 2000. Prospects for progress in heterodox economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 22, no. 2, 157-70
14. Dow, S. C. 2004. Reorienting economics: some epistemological issues, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 11, no.3, 307-12
15. Fontana, G. and Gerrard, B. 2006. The future of post-Keyensian economics, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, vol. 59, no. 236, 49-80
16. Fuller, S. 2003. Kuhn vs Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science, Cambridge, Icon Books
17. Garnett, R. F. 2006. Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics, Review of Political Economy, vol. 18, 521-46
18. Garnett, R. F. 2009. Rethinking the pluralist debate in economics education, International Review of Economics Education, vol. 8, no. 2, 58-71
19. Garnett, R. F. 2011. Pluralism, academic freedom, and heterodox economics, Review of Radical Political Economics, forthcoming
20. Hamouda, O. and Harcourt, G. C. 1988. Post-Keynesianism: from criticism to coherence?, Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 40, no. 1, 1-33, reprinted in Pheby, J. (ed.), 1989. New Directions in Post Keynesian Economics, Aldershot, Elgar
21. Hands, D. W. 2001. Reflections Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
22. Hutton, W. 1986. The Revolution That NeverWas: An Assessment of Keynesian Economics, London, Longman
23. King, J. 2002. A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936, London, Macmillan
24. King, J. 2011. Post Keynesians and others, Review of Political Economy, forthcoming
25. Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
26. Lavoie, M. 2009. 'After the Crisis: Perspectives for Post-Keynesian Economics', mimeo, University of Ottawa
27. Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and Reality, London, Routledge
28. Lawson, T. 2006. The nature of heterodox economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 4, 483-507
29. Lawson, T. 2009. Heterodox economics and pluralism: reply to Davis, pp. 93-129 in Fullbrook, E. (ed.), Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and his Critics, London, Routledge
30. Lee, F. S. 2009. A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century, London, Routledge
31. McCloskey, D. N. 1990. Storytelling in economics, pp. 61-75 in Lavoie, D. (ed.), Economics and Hermeneutics, London, Routledge
32. Meador, D. 2009. Comment on 'What is heterodox economics? Conversations with historians of economic thought', Forum for Social Economics, vol. 38, 71-3
33. Mearman, A. 2010. 'What is This Thing Called "Heterodox Economics"?', UWE Economics Discussion Paper no.10/06
34. Milonakis, D. and Fine, B. 2009. From Political Economy to Economics, London, Routledge
35. Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M. (eds) 1998. American economics: the character of the transformation, pp. 1-28, in From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, History of Political Economy, vol. 30, Annual Supplement, Durham, NC and London, Duke University Press
36. Negru, I. 2009. Reflections on pluralism in economics, International Review of Economics Education, vol. 8, no. 2, 7-20
37. Schabas, M. 1992. Breaking away: history of economics as history of science, History of Political Economy, vol. 24, no. 1, 187-203
38. Smith, A. 1980[1795]. The history of astronomy, in Wightman, W. L. D. (ed.), Essays on Philosophical Subjects, Oxford, Oxford University Press
39. Tily, G. 2007. Keynes's General Theory, The Rate of Interest and 'Keynesian' Economics, London, Palgrave Macmillan
40. Vigo de Lima, I. 2010. Foucault's Archeology of Political Economy, London, Palgrave Macmillan
41. Weintraub, E. R. (ed.) 2002. The Future of the History of Economics, History of Political Economy, vol. 34, annual supplement, Durham, NC and London, Duke University Press