Predicting protein ligand binding motions with the conformation explorer

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Flores, Samuel C ^a   Gerstein, Mark B ^b,c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D STRUCTURE; ATOMIC POSITIONS; CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE; EULER ROTATION; FITNESS FUNCTIONS; LIGAND BINDING; POTENTIAL LIGAND; PROTEIN LIGANDS;

CONFORMATIONS; FORECASTING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEINS;

LIGANDS;

CARRIER PROTEIN; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DESIGN; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

CARRIER PROTEINS; DRUG DESIGN; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 80054911612     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-417     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Gerstein M, Krebs W. A database of macromolecular motions. Nucleic acids research 1998, 26(18):4280-4290. 10.1093/nar/26.18.4280, 147832, 9722650.
2. Gerstein MRJ, Johnson T, Tsai J, Krebs W. Studying Macromolecular Motions in a Database Framework: from Structure to Sequence. Rigidity Theory and Applications 1999, 401-442.
3. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125(7):1731-1737. 10.1021/ja026939x, 12580598.
4. Carlson HAMK, McCammon JA. Method for Including the Dynamic Fluctuations of a Protein in Computer-Aided Drug Design. J Phys Chem A 1999, 103:10213-10219.
5. Seeliger D, Haas J, de Groot BL. Geometry-based sampling of conformational transitions in proteins. Structure 2007, 15(11):1482-1492. 10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017, 17997973.
6. LE van der S, LE D, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJ. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2005, 16(26):1701-1718.
7. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2002, 9(9):646-652.
8. Adcock SA, McCammon JA. Molecular Dynamics: A Survey of Methods for Simulating the Activity of Proteins. Chemical Reviews 2006, 106(5):1589-1615. 10.1021/cr040426m, 2547409, 16683746.
9. McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 1977, 267(5612):585-590. 10.1038/267585a0, 301613.
10. Frembgen-Kesner T, Elcock AH. Computational sampling of a cryptic drug binding site in a protein receptor: explicit solvent molecular dynamics and inhibitor docking to p38 MAP kinase. Journal of molecular biology 2006, 359(1):202-214. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.021, 16616932.
11. Bowers KJ, Chow E, Xu H, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, Gregersen BA, Klepeis JL, Kolossvary I, Moraes MA, Sacerdoti FD, et al. Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing 2006, 84. Tampa, Florida: ACM.
12. Lin J-H, Perryman AL, Schames JR, McCammon JA. Computational Drug Design Accommodating Receptor Flexibility: The Relaxed Complex Scheme. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2002, 124(20):5632-5633. 10.1021/ja0260162, 12010024.
13. Lin J-H, Perryman AL, Schames JR, McCammon JA. The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. Biopolymers 2003, 68(1):47-62. 10.1002/bip.10218, 12579579.
14. Pang A, Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MS, Biggin PC. Interdomain dynamics and ligand binding: molecular dynamics simulations of glutamine binding protein. FEBS Lett 2003, 550(1-3):168-174. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00866-4, 12935905.
15. Althaus EOK, Lenhof HP, Muller P. A Combinatorial Approach to Protein Docking with Flexible Side-Chains. Journal of Computational Biology 2000, 9(4):597-612.
16. Sandak B, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: insights from an open to closed conformational isomers. Proteins 1998, 32(2):159-174. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980801)32:2<159::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-G, 9714156.
17. Cavasotto CN, Kovacs JA, Abagyan RA. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127(26):9632-9640. 10.1021/ja042260c, 15984891.
18. Krebs WG, Alexandrov V, Wilson CA, Echols N, Yu H, Gerstein M. Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic. Proteins 2002, 48(4):682-695. 10.1002/prot.10168, 12211036.
19. Alexandrov V, Lehnert U, Echols N, Milburn D, Engelman D, Gerstein M. Normal modes for predicting protein motions: a comprehensive database assessment and associated Web tool. Protein Sci 2005, 14(3):633-643. 10.1110/ps.04882105, 2279292, 15722444.
20. Petrone P, Pande VS. Can conformational change be described by only a few normal modes?. Biophysical journal 2006, 90(5):1583-1593. 10.1529/biophysj.105.070045, 1367309, 16361336.
21. Zheng W, Brooks BR. Normal-Modes-Based Prediction of Protein Conformational Changes Guided by Distance Constraints. Biophysical journal 2005, 88(5):3109-3117. 10.1529/biophysj.104.058453, 1305462, 15722427.
22. Lindahl E, Delarue M. Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low frequency normal mode amplitude optimization. Nucleic acids research 2005, 33(14):4496-4506. 10.1093/nar/gki730, 1183489, 16087736.
23. Keseru GM, Kolossvary I. Fully Flexible Low-Mode Docking: Application to Induced Fit in HIV Integrase. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2001, 123(50):12708-12709. 10.1021/ja0160086, 11741448.
24. Zacharias M, Sklenar H. Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand-receptor docking simulations: Application to DNA minor groove ligand complex. Journal of Computational Chemistry 1999, 20(3):287-300.
25. Maiorov V, Abagyan R. A new method for modeling large-scale rearrangements of protein domains. Proteins 1997, 27(3):410-424. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199703)27:3<410::AID-PROT9>3.0.CO;2-G, 9094743.
26. Seeliger D, de Groot BL. Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6(1):e1000634. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000634, 2796265, 20066034.
27. Flores SC, Keating KS, Painter J, Morcos F, Nguyen K, Merritt EA, Kuhn LA, Gerstein MB. HingeMaster: Normal mode hinge prediction approach and integration of complementary predictors. Proteins 2008,
28. Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. Journal of molecular biology 2000, 295(2):337-356. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371, 10623530.
29. Muegge I, Martin YC. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J Med Chem 1999, 42(5):791-804. 10.1021/jm980536j, 10072678.
30. Korb O, Stutzle T, Exner TE. Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein-ligand docking with PLANTS. J Chem Inf Model 2009, 49(1):84-96. 10.1021/ci800298z, 19125657.
31. Englebienne P, Moitessier N. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 4. Are popular scoring functions accurate for this class of proteins?. J Chem Inf Model 2009, 49(6):1568-1580. 10.1021/ci8004308, 19445499.
32. Maiorov V AR. Energy strain in three-dimensional protein structures. Fold Des 1998, 3(4):259-269. 10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00037-6, 9710569.
33. Flores SC, Gerstein MB. FlexOracle: predicting flexible hinges by identification of stable domains. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:215. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-215, 1933439, 17587456.
34. Painter J, Merritt EA. Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006, 62(Pt 4):439-450.
35. Chennubhotla C, Rader AJ, Yang LW, Bahar I. Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies. Phys Biol 2005, 2(4):S173-180. 10.1088/1478-3975/2/4/S12, 16280623.
36. Siddiqui AS, Barton GJ. Continuous and discontinuous domains: an algorithm for the automatic generation of reliable protein domain definitions. Protein Sci 1995, 4(5):872-884. 2143117, 7663343.
37. Holm L, Sander C. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins 1994, 19(3):256-268. 10.1002/prot.340190309, 7937738.
38. Flores S, Echols N, Milburn D, Hespenheide B, Keating K, Lu J, Wells S, Yu EZ, Thorpe M, Gerstein M. The Database of Macromolecular Motions: new features added at the decade mark. Nucleic acids research 2006, (34 Database):D296-301.
39. EJ JK, Jaton JC. Selective reduction and proteolysis in the hinge region of liganded and unliganded antibodies: identical kinetics suggest lack of major conformational change in the hinge region. Eur J Immunol 1978, 8(5):309-314. 10.1002/eji.1830080505, 28953.
40. Yu S, Fan F, Flores S, Mei F, Cheng X. Dissecting the Mechanism of Epac Activation via Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange FT-IR and Structural Modeling. Biochemistry 2006, 45(51):15318-15326. 10.1021/bi061701x, 2519952, 17176054.
41. Eickel VDD, Carter N, Lockhart A, Jones JK, Cross R. Kinesin heads fused to hinge-free myosin tails drive efficient motility. FEBS Lett 2004, 569(1-3):54-58. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.050, 15225608.
42. Margittai MWJ, Schweinberger E, Schroder GF, Felekyan S, Haustein E, Konig M, Fasshauer D, Grubmuller H, Jahn R, et al. Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer reveals a dynamic equilibrium between closed and open conformations of syntaxin 1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100(26):15516-15521. 10.1073/pnas.2331232100, 307599, 14668446.
43. Wishart M. NMR: prediction of protein flexibility. Nature Protocols 2006, 1:683-688. 10.1038/nprot.2006.108, 17406296.
44. Wetlaufer DB. Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1973, 70(3):697-701. 10.1073/pnas.70.3.697, 433338, 4351801.
45. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996, 14(1):33-38. 27-38, 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5, 8744570.
46. Cavasotto CN, Orry AJW, Murgolo NJ, Czarniecki MF, Kocsi SA, Hawes BE, O'Neill KA, Hine H, Burton MS, Voigt JH, et al. Discovery of Novel Chemotypes to a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor through Ligand-Steered Homology Modeling and Structure-Based Virtual Screening. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2008, 51(3):581-588. 10.1021/jm070759m, 18198821.
47. Phatak SS, Gatica EA, Cavasotto CN. Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in class A G-protein-coupled receptors. J Chem Inf Model 2010, 50(12):2119-2128. 10.1021/ci100285f, 21080692.
48. van Aalten DMFBR, Findlay JBC, Hendlich M, Hooft RWW, Vriend G. PRODRG, a program for generating molecular topologies and unique molecular descriptors from coordinates of small molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1996, 10:255. 10.1007/BF00355047, 8808741.
49. Morris GMGD, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J Computational Chemistry 1998, 19:1639-1662.
50. Newcomer MLB, Quiocho FA. The Radius of Gyration of L-Arabinose- binding Protein Decreases upon Binding of Ligand. J Biol Chem 1981, 254(24):13218.
51. Abele RSD, Keinanen K, Koch M, Madden DR. A Molecular Envelope of the Ligand-Binding Domain of a Glutamate Receptor in the Presence and Absence of Agonist. Biochemistry 1999, 38:10949. 10.1021/bi982928y, 10460150.
52. Svergun DIKM. Small-angle scattering studies of biological macromolecules in solution. Reports on Progress in Physics 2003, 66:1735-1782.
53. Radius of Gyration. Wikipedia 2011,
54. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. Journal of molecular biology 2002, 320(2):369-387. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4, 12079393.
55. Hsiao CD, Sun YJ, Rose J, Wang BC. The crystal structure of glutamine-binding protein from Escherichia coli. Journal of molecular biology 1996, 262(2):225-242. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0509, 8831790.
56. Sun YJ, Rose J, Wang BC, Hsiao CD. The structure of glutamine-binding protein complexed with glutamine at 1.94 A resolution: comparisons with other amino acid binding proteins. Journal of molecular biology 1998, 278(1):219-229. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1675, 9571045.
57. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 1995, 8(2):127-134. 10.1093/protein/8.2.127, 7630882.
58. Kondo S, Nakajima Y, Sugio S, Yong-Biao J, Sueda S, Kondo H. Structure of the biotin carboxylase subunit of pyruvate carboxylase from Aquifex aeolicus at 2.2 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004, 60(Pt 3):486-492.
59. Thoden JB, Blanchard CZ, Holden HM, Waldrop GL. Movement of the biotin carboxylase B-domain as a result of ATP binding. J Biol Chem 2000, 275(21):16183-16190. 10.1074/jbc.275.21.16183, 10821865.
60. Bjorkman AJ, Binnie RA, Zhang H, Cole LB, Hermodson MA, Mowbray SL. Probing protein-protein interactions. The ribose-binding protein in bacterial transport and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 1994, 269(48):30206-30211.
61. Reinstein J, Vetter IR, Schlichting I, Rosch P, Wittinghofer A, Goody RS. Fluorescence and NMR investigations on the ligand binding properties of adenylate kinases. Biochemistry 1990, 29(32):7440-7450. 10.1021/bi00484a013, 2223775.
62. Eschenburg S, Priestman MA, Abdul-Latif FA, Delachaume C, Fassy F, Schonbrunn E. A novel inhibitor that suspends the induced fit mechanism of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA). J Biol Chem 2005, 280(14):14070-14075. 10.1074/jbc.M414412200, 15701635.
63. Skarzynski T, Kim DH, Lees WJ, Walsh CT, Duncan K. Stereochemical course of enzymatic enolpyruvyl transfer and catalytic conformation of the active site revealed by the crystal structure of the fluorinated analogue of the reaction tetrahedral intermediate bound to the active site of the C115A mutant of MurA. Biochemistry 1998, 37(8):2572-2577. 10.1021/bi9722608, 9485407.
64. Xu Q. Private conversation.
65. SC LJ, Yang J, Carriero NJ, Gerstein MB. Hinge Atlas: relating protein sequence to sites of structural flexibility. BMC Bioinformatics 2007,
66. Bhinge A, Chakrabarti P, Uthanumallian K, Bajaj K, Chakraborty K, Varadarajan R. Accurate detection of protein:ligand binding sites using molecular dynamics simulations. Structure 2004, 12(11):1989-1999. 10.1016/j.str.2004.09.005, 15530363.