A new measure for assessing document complexity: The PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 638-657

  Mosenthal, Peter B ^a   Kirsch, Irwin S ^b  

^a 200 Huntington Hall   (United States)

^b EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001018018     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Atwood, N., Baker, E., & Duffy, T.M. (1985). Cognitive approaches to the analysis of technical understanding (CDC Tech. Rep. No. 24). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Communications Design Center.
2. Bassett, E.D., Goodman, D.G., & Fosegan, J.S. (1981). Business records controls (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
3. Bertin, J. (1980). The basic test of the graph: A matrix theory of graph construction and cartography. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 2, pp. 585-604). New York: Plenum.
4. Bormuth, J. (1966). Readability: A new approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 79-132.
5. Burch, J.G., & Grudnitski, G. (1986). Information systems: Theory and practice (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
6. Charney, D. (1986). Redesigning and testing a work order form (CDC Tech. Rep. No. 28). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Communications Design Center.
7. Dale, E., & Chall, J.S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20, 37-54.
8. de Geus, W.C., & Reitsma, P. (1994). Cognitive components of task difficulty in document literacy. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice (43rd yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 101-111). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
9. Dreher, M.J. (1993). Reading to locate information: Societal and educational perspectives. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 129-138.
10. Duffy, T.M. (1985). Readability formulas: What's the use? In T.M. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 113-143). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11. Felker, D.B., & Rose, A.M. (1981). The evaluation of a public document (Tech. Rep. No. 11). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, Document Design Center.
12. Firth, D. (1981). An investigation of the success of redesigned supplementary benefits documents. Information Design Journal, 2, 33-43.
13. Fry, E. (1977). Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, validity and extension to Level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242-252.
14. Guthrie, J.T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 300-324.
15. Guthrie, J.T., Britten, T., & Barker, K.G. (1991). Role of document structure and metacognitive awareness in the cognitive process of searching for information. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 300-324.
16. Guthrie, J.T., & Kirsch, I.S. (1987). Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 220-227.
17. Guthrie, J.T., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1987). Literacy as multidimensional: Locating information and reading comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 22, 279-297.
18. Guthrie, J.T., Seifert, M., & Kirsch, I.S. (1986). Effects of education, occupation, and setting on reading practices. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 151-160.
19. Guthrie, I.T., Weber, S., & Kimmerly, N. (1993). Searching documents: Cognitive processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables, and illustrations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 186-221.
20. Hartley, J. (1985). Designing instructional text. New York: Nichols.
21. Hunter, B., Crismore, A., & Pearson, P.D. (1987). Visual displays in basal readers and social studies textbooks. In H.A. Houghton & D.M. Willows (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: Instructional issues (Vol. 2, pp. 116-135). New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. IRA election results from 1958 to 1995: Distribution by place of employment, sex, and geographic region. (1997, February/March). Reading Today, 14, p. 12.
23. Janik, C.J., Hannah, J., Waney, S., Bond, S.J., & Hayes, J.R. (1981). Informed consent: Reality or illusion? Information Design Journal, 2, 197-207.
24. Keller-Cohen, D. (1987). Organizational contexts and texts: The redesign of the Midwest Bell telephone bill. Discourse Processes. 10, 417-428.
25. Kirsch, I.S., & Guthrie, J.T. (1984). Prose comprehension and text search as a function of reading volume. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 331-342.
26. Kirsch, I.S., & Jungeblut, A. (1986). Literacy: Profiles of America's young adults (NAEP Report No. 16-PL-01). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
27. Kirsch, I.S., & Jungeblut, A. (1992). Profiling the literacy proficiencies of JTPA and ES/UI populations: Final report to the Department of Labor. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28. Kirsch, I.S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
29. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1989). Building documents by combining simple lists. Journal of Reading, 33, 132-135.
30. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1990a). Exploring document literacy: Variables underlying the performance of young adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 5-30.
31. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1990b). Nested lists. Journal of Reading, 33, 294-297.
32. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1990c). Understanding forms (Part I). Journal of Reading, 33, 542-545.
33. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1990d). Understanding forms (Part II). Journal of Reading, 33, 636-641.
34. Kirsch, I.S., & Mosenthal, P.B. (1995). Interpreting the IEA reading literacy scales. In M. Binkley, K. Rust, & M. Winglee (Eds.), Methodological issues in comparative educational studies: The case of the IEA Reading Literacy Study (pp. 135-192). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
35. Klare, G.R. (1984). Readability. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P.B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 681-744). New York: Longman.
36. Landesman, J. (1981). The "FISAP," before and after. The Journal of Business Communication, 18, 12-21.
37. Meyer, B.J.F., Marsiske, M., & Willis, S.L. (1993). Text processing variables predict the readability of everyday documents read by older adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 235-248.
38. Mikulecky, L., & Drew, R. (1991). Basic literacy skills in the workplace. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 669-689). New York: Longman.
39. Miller, R.B. (1984). Transaction and structures and format in form design. In R. Easterby & H. Zwaga (Eds.), Information design: The design and evaluation of signs and evaluations of printed materials (pp. 529-544). New York: Wiley.
40. Milroy, R., & Poulton, E.C. (1979). Labeling graphs for improved reading speed. Ergonomics, 21, 55-59.
41. Mosenthal, P.B. (1986). Defining the expository discourse continuum: Towards a taxonomy of expository text types. Poetics, 14, 387-414.
42. Mosenthal, P.B. (1996). Understanding the strategies of document literacy and their conditions of use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 314-332.
43. Mosenthal, P.B. (in press). Defining prose task characteristics for use in computer-adaptive testing and instruction. American Educational Research Journal.
44. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1989a). Lists: The building blocks of documents. Journal of Reading, 33, 58-60.
45. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1989b). Intersecting lists. Journal of Reading, 33, 210-213.
46. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1990a). Understanding graphs and charts (Part I). Journal of Reading, 33, 371-373.
47. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1990b). Understanding graphs and charts (Part II). Journal of Reading, 33, 454-457.
48. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1990c). Understanding general reference maps. Journal of Reading, 34, 60-63.
49. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1990d). Understanding thematic maps. Journal of Reading, 34, 136-140.
50. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1991a). Information types in nonmimetic documents: A review of Biddle's wipe-clean slate. Journal of Reading, 34, 654-660.
51. Mosenthal, P.B., & Kirsch, I.S. (1991b). Toward an explanatory model of document literacy. Discourse Processes, 14, 147-180.
52. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Statistics Canada. (1995). Literacy, economy, and society: Results of the first International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris, France, and Ottawa, ON: Authors.
53. Over-the-counter medicines need simpler labels, government says. (1997, February 26). Syracuse (New York) Herald Journal. p. B-1. (Source, Associated Press)
54. Playfair, W. (1805). An inquiry into the permanent causes of the decline and fall of powerful and wealthy nations. London: Greenland & Norris.
55. Raines, C. (Ed.). (1980). Forms for the 80s: How to design and produce them. Philadelphia: North American.
56. Rayner, D. (1982). Review of administrative forms report to the Prime Minister. London: Management & Personnel Office.
57. Roller, B.V. (1980). Graph reading abilities of thirteen-year-olds. In P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (Vol. 2, pp. 305-314). New York: Plenum.
58. Schumacher, G.M., & Waller, R. (1985). Testing design alternatives: A comparison of procedures. In T.M. Duffy & R. Waller (Eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 377-403). New York: Academic Press.
59. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade materials. Elementary School Journal, 53, 410-413.
60. Statistics Canada. (1996). Reading the future. A portrait of literacy in Canada (International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS)). Ottawa, ON: Author.
61. Sticht, T. (1977). Comprehending reading at work. In M.A. Just & P.A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Trapini, F., & Walmsley, S.A. (1981). Five readability estimates: Differential effects of simplifying a document. Journal of Reading, 24, 398-403.
63. Tufte, E.R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
64. Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21, 14-23.
65. Waller, R. (1984). Designing a government form: A case study. Information Design Journal, 4, 36-57.
66. Walmsley, S.A., Scott, K.M., & Lehrer, R. (1981). Effects of document simplification on the reading comprehension of the elderly. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 237-248.
67. Weaver, C.A., III, & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 230-245). New York: Longman.
68. Winn, B. (1987). Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials. In D.M. Willows & H.A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration (Vol. 1, pp. 152-198). New York: Springer-Verlag.
69. Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211-247.
70. World Almanac and Book of Facts. (1992). New York: Pharos Books.
71. Wright, P. (1979). The quality control of document design. Information Design Journal, 1, 33-42.
72. Wright, P. (1980). Strategy and tactics in the design of forms. Visible Language, 14, 151-193.
73. Wright, P. (1984). Informed design for forms. In R. Easterby & H.G. Zwaga (Eds.), Information design and evaluation of signs and printed materials (pp. 545-577). New York: Wiley.
74. Wright, P. (1988). Writing technical information. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 14, pp. 327-385). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.