Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 802-808

  Franconeri, S L ^a   Lin, J Y ^b   Pylyshyn, Z W ^c   Fisher, B ^d   Enns, J T ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CROWDING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ACCELERATION; ATTENTION; CROWDING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 50949084935     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.802     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ALVAREZ, G. A., & CAVANAGH, P. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science, 16, 637-643.
2. ALVAREZ, G. A., & FRANCONERI, S. L. (2007). How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13): 14, 1-10.
3. CARLSON, T. A., ALVAREZ, G. A., & CAVANAGH, P. C. (2007). Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13496-13500.
4. CAVANAGH, P., & ALVAREZ, G. A. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 349-354.
5. FRANCONERI, S. L., ALVAREZ, G. A., & ENNS, J. T. (2007). How many locations can you select? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1003-1012.
6. HOPF, J.-M., BOEHLER, C. N., LUCK, S. J., TSOTSOS, J. K., HEINZE, H.-J., & SCHOENFELD, A. M. (2006). Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 1053-1058.
7. INTRILIGATOR, J., & CAVANAGH, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171-216.
8. LIU, G., AUSTEN, E. L., BOOTH, K. S., FISHER, B. D., ARGUE, R., REMPEL, M. I., & ENNS, J. T. (2005). Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 235-247.
9. MCKEE, S. P., & SMALLMAN, H. S. (1998). Size and speed constancy. In V. Walsh & J. J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual constancies: Why things look as they do (pp. 373-408). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. PELLI, D. G., PALOMARES, M., & MAJAJ, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1136-1169.
11. PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (2004). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11, 801-822.
12. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & STORM, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
13. SCHOLL, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
14. SERENO, A. B., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (1991). Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention. Neuropsychologia, 29, 659-675.
15. SHIM, W. M., ALVAREZ, G. A., & JIANG, Y. V. (2008). Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 390-397.
16. TOET, A., & LEVI, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349-1357.