Integrating multiple views with virtual mirrors to facilitate scene understanding

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Au, Carmen E ^a   Clark, James J ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attentional Load; Image integration; Psychophysics; Scene identification; Virtual mirror; Visual task

Indexed keywords

ATTENTIONAL LOAD; IMAGE INTEGRATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VIRTUAL MIRROR; VISUAL TASKS;

INTEGRATION; MIRRORS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 80054845836     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2043603.2043610     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ALAIS, D. AND BLAKE, R. 1999. Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation. Nature Neurosci. 2, 1015-1018. (Pubitemid 30599566)
2. AU, C. E. AND CLARK, J. J. 2008. Multiple view integration and display using virtual mirror. In Proceedings of the 5th Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV). 286-293.
3. BEIS, J. AND LOWE, D. 1997. Shape indexing using approximate nearest-neighbor search in high dimensional spaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recognition. 1000-1006.
4. BERTAMINI, M., LATTO, R., AND SPOONER, A. 2003. The Venus effect: People's understanding of mirror reflections in paintings. Perception 32, 5, 593-599. (Pubitemid 37551036)
5. BERTAMINI, M. AND PARK, T. E. 2005. On what people know about images on mirrors. Cognition 98, 1, 85-104. (Pubitemid 41628218)
6. BIEDERMAN, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psych. Rev. 94, 115-147.
7. BIEDERMAN, I. AND GERHARDSTEIN, P. 1993. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exper. Psych. Human Percept. Perform. 23, 1162-1182.
8. BIEDERMAN, I. AND GERHARDSTEIN, P. 1995. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff. J. Exper. Psych. Human Percept. Perform. 21, 1506-1514. (Pubitemid 126003207)
9. BROADBENT, D. 1958. Perception and Communication. Pergamon, London.
10. BROWN, M. AND LOWE, D. G. 2007. Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant feature. Int. J. Comput. Vision 74, 1, 59-73. (Pubitemid 46673104)
11. BüLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S. Y., AND TARR, M. J. 1995. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cereb. Cortex 5, 3, 247-260.
12. CAPEL, D. AND ZISSERMAN, A. 1998. Automated mosaicing with super resolution zoom. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
13. CASTELHANO, M. S., POLLATSEK, A., AND RAYNER, K. 2009. Integration of multiple views of scenes. Attention, Percep. Psychophysics 71, 490-502.
14. CHRISTOU, C. AND BüLTHOFF, H. 1999. View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory and Cognition 27, 996-1007.
15. COLOMBO, C., COMANDUCCI, D., AND BIMBO, A. D. 2006. Camera calibration with two arbitrary coaxial circles. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV'06). Springer, Berlin.
16. CROUCHER, C. J., BERTAMINI, M., AND HECHT, H. 2002. Naive optics: Understanding the geometry of mirror reflections. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Percept. Perform. 28, 546-562.
17. DEBEVEC, P., YU, Y., AND BOSHOKOV, G. 1998. Efficient view-dependent image-based rendering with projective texture mapping. Tech. rep. CSD-98-1003, University of California, Berkeley.
18. EDELMAN, S. AND WEINSHALL, D. 1991. A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects. Biol. Cybern. 64, 209-219.
19. GARSOFFKY, B., SCHWAN, S., AND HESSE, F. 2002. Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. J. Exper. Psych. Learn. Memory, Cognition 28, 1035-1050.
20. HARTLEY, R. AND KANG, S. B. 2007. Parameter-free radial distortion correction with center of distortion estimation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 8 , 1309-1321. (Pubitemid 47040432)
21. HAYWARD, W. AND WILLIAMS, P. 2000. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psych. Sci. 11, 7-12.
22. HOCK, H. AND SCHMELZKOPF, K. 1980. The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory and Cognition 8, 543-554.
23. IRANI, M. AND ANANDAN, P. 2000. About direct methods. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Vision Algorithms. Springer, Berlin, 267-277.
24. KANAZAWA, Y. AND KANATANI, K. 2002. Image mosaicing by stratified matching. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Methods in Video Processing.
25. KANNALA, J. AND BRANDT, S. 2006. A generic camera model and calibration method for conventional, wide-angle, and fish-eye lenses. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 8 (Aug.), 1335-1340. (Pubitemid 46405029)
26. LAWSON, R. AND BERTAMINI, M. 2006. Errors in judging information about reflections in mirrors. Perception 35, 1265-1288. (Pubitemid 44757065)
27. LOWE, D. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoint. Int. J. Comput. Vision 20, 91-110.
28. MARR, D. AND NISHIHARA, H. 1978. Visual information=processing: Artificial intelligence and sensorium of sight. Technol. Rev. 81, 28-49. (Pubitemid 9393742)
29. NAKATANI, C., POLLATSEK, A., AND. JOHNSON, S. H. 2002. Viewpoint dependent recognition of scene. Q. J. Exper. Psych. Sect. A 55, 115-139.
30. POGGIO, T. AND EDELMAN, S. 1990. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature Neurosci. 343, 263-266.
31. RANKOV, V., LOCKE, R. J., EDENS, R. J., BARBER, P. R., AND VOJNOVIC, B. 2005. An algorithm for image stitching and blending. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 5701, 190-199. (Pubitemid 40954803)
32. REES, G., FRITH, C., AND LAVIE, N. 1997. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278, 1616-1618.
33. TARDIF, J.-P., STURM, P., TRUDEAU, M., AND ROY, S. 2009. Calibration of cameras with radially symmetric distortion. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 31, 9, 1552-1566.
34. TARR, M. AND PINKER, S. 1989. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psych. 21, 233-282.
35. TARR, M., WILLIAMS, P., HAYWARD, W., AND GAUTHIER, I. 1998. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neurosci. 1, 275-277. (Pubitemid 128652672)
36. ULLMAN, S. AND BASRI, R. 1991. Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 193-254.
37. VETTER, T., POGGIO, T., AND BüLTHOFF, H. 1994. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Current Biology 4, 1, 18-23.
38. WALLIS, G. AND BüLTHOFF, H. 1999. Learning to recognize objects. Trends Cognitive Sci. 3, 1, 22-31. (Pubitemid 29045583)
39. ZHANG, Z. 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 22, 11, 1330-1334.
40. ZHENG, Y. AND LIU, Y. 2008. The projective equation of a circle and its application in camera calibration. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'08). 1-4.