The politics of studying securitization? The copenhagen school in Turkey

Security Dialogue

Volumn 42, Issue 4-5, 2011, Pages 399-412

  Bilgin, Pinar ^a  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Copenhagen School; Eurocentrism; periphery; securitization; security; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054844998     PISSN: 09670106     EISSN: 14603640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0967010611418711     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia. Acharya ABuzan B, ed. London: Routledge; 2009:.
2. Agathangelou AM,Ling LHM.The house of IR: From family power politics to the poisies of worldism.International Studies Review. 2004;6 (4): 21-49.
3. Aras B,Karakaya Polat R.From conflict to cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey's relations with Syria and Turkey.Security Dialogue. 2008;39 (5): 495-515.
4. Balzacq T.The policy tools of securitization: Information exchange, EU foreign and interior policies.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2008;46 (1): 75-100.
5. International Relations in South Asia: Search for an Alternative Paradigm. Behera NC, ed. New Delhi: Sage; 2008:.
6. Bilgin P.Turkey's changing security discourses: The challenge of globalisation.European Journal of Political Research. 2005;44 (1): 175-201.
7. Bilgin P.Making Turkey's transformation possible: Claiming 'security-speak' - not desecuritization!.Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2007a;7 (4): 555-571.
8. Bilgin P.'Only strong states can survive in Turkey's geography': The uses of 'geopolitical truths' in Turkey.Political Geography. 2007b;26 (7): 740-756.
9. Bilgin P.Thinking past 'Western' IR?.Third World Quarterly. 2008;29 (1): 5-23.
10. Bilgin PThinking the International. Tickner ABlaney D, ed. London: Routledge;.
11. Bilgin P,Tanri{dotless}sever OF.A telling story of IR in the periphery: Telling Turkey about the world, telling the world about Turkey.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2009;12 (2): 174-179.
12. Boswell C.Migration control in Europe after 9/11: Explaining the absence of securitization.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007;45 (3): 589-610.
13. Buzan B,Wæver O,De Wilde JSecurity: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1998:.
14. Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitisation. Caballero-Anthony MEmmers RAcharya A, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:.
15. Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto.Security Dialogue. 2006;37 (4): 443-487.
16. The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory From East to West. Chan SMandaville PGBleiker R, ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001:.
17. Collins A.Securitization, Frankenstein's monster and Malaysian education.The Pacific Review. 2005;18 (4): 567-588.
18. Security and Migration in Asia: The Dynamics of Securitisation. Curley MGWong S-l, ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2008:.
19. Drulak P, et al.Forum: International relations (IR) in Central and Eastern Europe.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2009;12 (2): 168-220.
20. Studying Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Trends and Issues. Emmers RCaballero-Anthony MAcharya A, ed. London Marshall Cavendish Academic; 2006:.
21. Emmers R,Greener BK,Thomas NSecurity and Migration in Asia: The Dynamics of Securitisation. Curley MGWong S-l, ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2008:59-81.
22. Haacke J,Williams PD.Regional arrangements, securitization, and transnational security challenges: The African Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Compared.Security Studies. 2008;17 (4): 775-809.
23. Herington J.Securitization of infectious diseases in Vietnam: The cases of HIV and avian influenza.Health Policy and Planning. 2010;25 (6): 467-475.
24. Hobson JM.Is critical theory always for the white West and Western imperialism? Beyond Westphalian towards a post-racist critical IR.Review of International Studies. 2007;33 (S1): 91-116.
25. Huysmans JThe Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration, and Asylum in the EU. Abingdon & New York: Routledge; 2006:.
26. Hyun T,Kim S-h,Lee GStudying Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Trends And Issues. Emmers RCaballero-Anthony MAcharya A, ed. London: Marshall Cavendish Academic; 2006:108-128.
27. İlhan SAvrupa Birliǧi'ne Neden 'Hayi{dotless}r': Jeopolitik Yaklaşi{dotless}m. Istanbul: Ötüken; 2000:.
28. Inayatollah N,Blaney DLInternational Relations and the Problem of Difference. London: Routledge; 2004:.
29. Inoguchi T.Are there any theories of international relations in Japan?.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007;7 (3): 369-390.
30. Special issue of Global Society: Locating the 'I' in 'IR' - Dislocating Euro-American theories.Global Society. 2002;17 (2):.
31. Kaliber A.Securing the ground through securitized 'foreign' policy: The Cyprus case.Security Dialogue. 2005;36 (3): 319-337.
32. Kaliber A,Tocci N.Civil society and the transformation of Turkey's Kurdish question.Security Dialogue. 2010;41 (2): 191-215.
33. Karakaya Polat P.The 2007 parliamentary elections in turkey: Between securitisation and desecuritisation.Parliamentary Affairs. 2008;62 (1): 129-148.
34. Liow JCNon-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitization. Caballero-Anthony MEmmers RAcharya A, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:40-65.
35. Lo Yuk-ping C,Thomas N.How is health a security issue? Politics, responses and issues.Health Policy and Planning. 2010;25 (6): 447-453.
36. Mak JNNon-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitization. Caballero-Anthony MEmmers RAcharya A, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:66-92.
37. Matti J.Desecuritizing minority rights: Against determinism.Security Dialogue. 2006;37 (2): 167-185.
38. Murphy CNCritical Theory and World Politics. Wyn Jones R, ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2001:61-76.
39. Murphy CN.The promise of critical IR, partially kept.Review of International Studies. 2007;33 (S1): 117-133.
40. Neufeld MA.Reflexivity and international relations theory.Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 1993;22 (1): 53-76.
41. Oren IOur Enemies and US: America's Rivalries and the Making of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2003:.
42. Panggabean SRNon-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitization. Caballero-Anthony MEmmers RAcharya A, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:168-197.
43. Pasha MK.Security as hegemony.Alternatives - Social Transformation and Humane Governance. 1996;21 (3): 283-302.
44. Pasha MKDecolonizing International Relations. Jones BG, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2006:65-85.
45. Pasha MK,Murphy CN.Knowledge/power/inequality.International Studies Review. 2002;4 (2): 1-6.
46. Peoples C,Vaughan-Williams NCritical Security Studies: An Introduction. Abingdon & New York: Routledge; 2010:.
47. Puchala DInternational Relations Theory and the Third World. Neuman SG, ed. London: Macmillan; 1998:133-157.
48. Roe P.Securitization and minority rights: Conditions of desecuritization.Security Dialogue. 2004;35 (3): 279-294.
49. Roe PSecurity Dialogue. 2008:615-636.
50. Said EWThe Edward Said Reader. Bayoumi MRubin A, ed. New York: Vintage; 2000:195-217.
51. Siddiqui TStudying Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Trends and Issues. Emmers RCaballero-Anthony MAcharya A, ed. London: Marshall Cavendish Academic; 2006:143-167.
52. Tan SSCritical Security in the Asia-Pacific. Burke AMcDonald M, ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2007:72-85.
53. Tickner AB.Seeing IR differently: Notes from the third world.Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2003;32 (2): 295-324.
54. Tickner AB,Herz MThinking International Relations Differently. Tickner ABBlaney DL, ed. London: Routledge;.
55. Tickner AB,Wæver OGlobal Scholarship in International Relations: Worlding Beyond the West. Tickner ABWæver O, ed. London: Routledge; 2009a:328-341.
56. Global Scholarship in International Relations: Worlding Beyond the West. Tickner ABWæver O, ed. London: Routledge; 2009b:.
57. Upadhyaya PNon-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitisation. Caballero-Anthony MEmmers RAcharya A, ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:13-39.
58. Vuori JA.Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: Applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders.European Journal of International Relations. 2008;14 (1): 65-99.
59. Wæver OOn Security. Lipschutz RD, ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1995:46-86.
60. Wæver OSecurity Communities. Adler EBarnett MN, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998:69-119.
61. Wæver O.Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New 'schools' in security theory and their origins between core and periphery. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association; 2004Montreal; 2004.
62. Wæver O,Buzan B,Kelstrup M,Lemaitre PIdentity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Pinter; 1993:.
63. Walt SM.The renaissance of security studies.International Studies Quarterly. 1991;35 (2): 211-239.
64. Waltz KNForeign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 1967:.
65. Wilkinson C.The Copenhagen School on tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is securitization theory useable outside Europe?.Security Dialogue. 2007;38 (1): 5-26.
66. Williams MC.Waltz, realism and democracy.International Relations. 2009;23 (3): 328-340.
67. Wishnick E.Dilemmas of securitization and health risk management in the People's Republic of China: The cases of SARS and avian influenza.Health Policy and Planning. 2010;25 (6): 467-475.