The potential value of hybrid positron emission tomography/dual-source computed tomography imaging in coronary bypass surgery

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Plass, Andre ^a   Emmert, Maximilian Y ^a   Gaemperli, Oliver ^a   Alkadhi, Hatem ^a,b   Kaufmann, Philipp ^a   Falk, Volkmar ^a   Grünenfelder, Jürg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DECISION MAKING; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART MUSCLE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR; VEIN BYPASS;

AGED; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80054836016     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: 15226662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20111045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. 2010. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart 96:933-8.
2. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. 1975. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5-40.
3. Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, Guyatt GH. 2000. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for nonacute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 321:73-7. (Pubitemid 30438478)
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. 2008. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724-32.
5. Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. 1994. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:384-9. (Pubitemid 24049369)
6. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. 2002. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539-42. (Pubitemid 34262671)
7. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, et al. 2006. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 27:1341-81. (Pubitemid 43998110)
8. Gaemperli O, Husmann L, Schepis T, et al. 2009. Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? Eur Heart J 30:2921-9.
9. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Kalff V, et al. 2007. Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1097-106. (Pubitemid 46919553)
10. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. 2007. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J Nucl Med 48:696-703. (Pubitemid 47604968)
11. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, et al. 2008. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology 248:414-23.
12. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. 2003. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 41:159-68. (Pubitemid 36044419)
13. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, et al. 1990. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 31:1899-905.
14. Hecht HS. 2009. Is coronary computed tomographic angiography the "gold standard" for coronary artery disease? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:334-9.
15. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, et al. 2009. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:150-6.
16. Koepfli P, Hany TF, Wyss CA, et al. 2004. CT attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion quantification using a PET/CT hybrid scanner. J Nucl Med 45:537-42. (Pubitemid 47618582)
17. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. 2009. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 19:2896-903.
18. Machac J, Bacharach SL, Bateman TM, et al. 2006. Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 13:e121-51. (Pubitemid 44913647)
19. Magee MJ, Alexander JH, Hafley G, et al. 2008. Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass: findings from PREVENT IV. Ann Thorac Surg 85:494-9; discussion 499-500.
20. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. 2008. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135-44.
21. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. 2008. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324-36.
22. Namdar M, Hany TF, Koepfli P, et al. 2005. Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J Nucl Med 46:930-5. (Pubitemid 43733506)
23. Narula J, Garg P, Achenbach S, et al. 2008. Arithmetic of vulnerable plaques for noninvasive imaging. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 5(suppl 2):S2-10.
24. Ong AT, Serruys PW. 2006. Complete revascularization: coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 114:249-55. (Pubitemid 44297118)
25. Plass A, Azemaj N, Scheffel H, et al. 2009. Accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation with a standardised protocol for cardiac surgeons. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36:1011-7.
26. Schindler TH, Magosaki N, Jeserich M, et al. 1999. Fusion imaging: combined visualization of 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree and 3D myocardial scintigraphic image in coronary artery disease. Int J Card Imaging 15:357-68; discussion 369-70.
27. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, et al. 2008. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29:531-56. (Pubitemid 351264173)
28. Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F, Sostman HD. 2008. 64-Slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 121:715-25.
29. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, et al. 1991. Comparison of rubidium- 82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 67:1303-10.
30. Tahara N, Imaizumi T, Virmani R, Narula J. 2009. Clinical feasibility of molecular imaging of plaque inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Nucl Med 50:331-4.
31. Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Senda M, et al. 1988. Value and limitation of stress thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography: comparison with nitrogen-13 ammonia positron tomography. J Nucl Med 29:1181-8.
32. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. 2009. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213-24.
33. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. 2010. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 31:2501-55.
34. Wyss CA, Koepfli P, Fretz G, et al. 2003. Influence of altitude exposure on coronary flow reserve. Circulation 108:1202-7. (Pubitemid 37099988)