Single cell adhesion force measurement for cell viability identification using an AFM cantilever-based micro putter

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

  Shen, Yajing ^a   Nakajima, Masahiro ^a   Kojima, Seiji ^a   Homma, Michio ^a   Kojima, Masaru ^a   Fukuda, Toshio ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL ADHESION; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ION BEAMS; MANIPULATORS; NANOCANTILEVERS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPES; FOCUSED ION BEAM ETCHING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; NANOROBOTIC MANIPULATION SYSTEMS; QUANTITATIVE RESULT; SINGLE-CELL LEVEL; SINGLECELL ANALYSIS; SUBSTRATE SURFACE;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

EID: 80054765559     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: 13616501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/11/115802     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Patel P and Markx G H 2008 Dielectric measurement of cell death Enzyme Microb. Technol. 43 463-70
2. Bonora A and Mares D 1982 A simple colorimetric method for detecting cell viability in cultures of eukaryotic microorganisms Curr. Microbiol. 7 217-21 (Pubitemid 13246861)
3. Kucsera J, Yarita K and Takeo K 2000 Simple detection method for distinguishing dead and living yeast colonies J. Microbiol. Methods 41 19-21 (Pubitemid 30345716)
4. Pohl H 1978 Dielectrophoresis: the Behavior of Neutral Matter in Nonuniform Electric Fields (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
5. Tuukkanen S, Kuzyk A, Toppari J, Hytönen V, Ihalainen T and Törmä P 2005 Dielectrophoresis of nanoscale double-stranded DNA and humidity effects on its electrical conductivity Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 183102
6. Pethig R 2010 Dielectrophoresis: status of the theory, technology, and applications Biomicrofluidics 4 022811
7. Prasad B, Du S, Badawy W and Kaler K V I S 2005 A real-time multiple-cell tracking platform for dielectrophoresis (DEP)-based cellular analysis Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 909
8. Markx G, Talary M and Pethig R 1994 Separation of viable and non-viable yeast using dielectrophoresis J. Biotechnol. 32 29-37 (Pubitemid 24047815)
9. Hakoda M, Wakizaka Y and Hirota Y 2010 Separation of viable and nonviable animal cell using dielectrophoretic filter Biotechnol. Prog. 26 1061-7
10. Yang Y, Zhang H, Zhu J, Wang G, Tzeng T-R, Xuan X, Huang K and Wang P 2010 Distinguishing the viability of a single yeast cell with an ultra-sensitive radio frequency sensor Lab Chip 10 553-5
11. Razatos A 2001 Application of atomic force microscopy to study initial events of bacterial adhesion Methods Enzymol. 337 276
12. Kim Y J, Shin J W, Park K D, Lee J W, Yui N, Park S A, Jee K S and Kim J K 2003 A study of compatibility between cells and biopolymeric surfaces through quantitative measurements of adhesive forces J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 14 1311-21 (Pubitemid 38028745)
13. Lu X, Huang W H, Wang Z L and Cheng J K 2004 Recent developments in single-cell analysis Anal. Chim. Acta 510 127-38 (Pubitemid 38510122)
14. Gumbiner B 1996 Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis Cell 84 345
15. Berrier A L and Yamada K M 2007 Cell-matrix adhesion J. Cell. Physiol. 213 565-73 (Pubitemid 350058247)
16. Cama G, Jacobs T, Dimaki M, Svendsen W E, Hauptmann P and Naumann M 2010 Disposable micro-fluidic biosensor array for online parallelized cell adhesion kinetics analysis on quartz crystal resonators Meas. Sci. Technol. 21 085801
17. Dembo M, Torney D, Saxman K and Hammer D 1988 The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment Proc. R. Soc. 234 55-83
18. Danilatos G 1993 Introduction to the ESEM instrument Microsc. Res. Tech. 25 354-61 (Pubitemid 23219408)
19. Muscariello L, Rosso F, Marino G, Giordano A, Barbarisi M, Cafiero G and Barbarisi A 2005 A critical overview of ESEM applications in the biological field J. Cell. Physiol. 205 328-34 (Pubitemid 41598846)
20. Fukuda T, Nakajima M, Liu P and Ahmad M 2008 Bringing the nanolaboratory inside electron microscopes IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag. 2 18-31
21. Carli L, Genta G, Cantatore A, Barbato G, De Chiffre L and Levi R 2011 Uncertainty evaluation for three-dimensional scanning electron microscope reconstructions based on the stereo-pair technique Meas. Sci. Technol. 22 035103
22. Muscariello L, Rosso F, Marino G, Barbarisi M, Cafiero G and Barbarisi A 2008 Cell surface protein detection with immunogold labelling in ESEM: optimisation of the method and semi quantitative analysis J. Cell. Physiol. 214 769-76 (Pubitemid 351224222)
23. Shen Y, Nakajima M, Ahmad M, Fukuda T, Kojima S and Homma M 2009 Single cell injection using nano pipette via nanorobotic manipulation system inside E-SEM IEEE Nanotechnology (Genoa, Italy) pp 518-21
24. Fukuda T, Nakajima M, Ahmad M R, Yajing S and Kojima M 2010 Micro- and nanomechatronics IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 4 13-22
25. Dammer U, Popescu O, Wagner P, Anselmetti D, Guntherodt H J and Misevic G N 1995 Binding strength between cell adhesion proteoglycans measured by atomic force microscopy Science 267 1173
26. Marshall B T, Long M, Piper J W, Yago T, McEver R P and Zhu C 2003 Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules Nature 423 190-3 (Pubitemid 36569544)
27. Kim H, Arakawa H, Osada T and Ikai A 2003 Quantification of cell adhesion force with AFM: distribution of vitronectin receptors on a living MC3T3-E1 cell Ultramicroscopy 97 359-63 (Pubitemid 36683308)
28. Puech P H, Poole K, Knebel D and Muller D J 2006 A new technical approach to quantify cell-cell adhesion forces by AFM Ultramicroscopy 106 637-44 (Pubitemid 43994307)
29. Green E and Olson M 1990 Chromosomal region of the cystic fibrosis gene in yeast artificial chromosomes: a model for human genome mapping Science 250 94
30. Lehle L, Strahl S and Tanner W 2006 Protein glycosylation, conserved from yeast to man: a model organism helps elucidate congenital human diseases Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 45 6802-18 (Pubitemid 44654465)
31. Ross J 1997 Going wild: wild yeast in winemaking Wines Vines 78 16-21
32. Inada T and Aiba H 2005 Translation of aberrant mRNAs lacking a termination codon or with a shortened 3-UTR is repressed after initiation in yeast EMBO J. 24 1584-95 (Pubitemid 40646448)
33. Ahmad M R, Nakajima M, Kojima S, Homma M and Fukuda T 2008 The effects of cell sizes, environmental conditions, and growth phases on the strength of individual W303 yeast cells inside ESEM IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci. 7 185-93
34. Latgé J 2010 Tasting the fungal cell wall Cell. Microbiol. 12 863-72
35. Kim M, Ahn J W, Jin U H, Choi D, Paek K H and Pai H S 2003 Activation of the programmed cell death pathway by inhibition of proteasome function in plants J. Biol. Chem. 278 19406