Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Value-Added Chicken Product Attributes

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Martínez Michel, Lorelei ^a   Anders, Sven ^a   Wismer, Wendy V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chicken attributes; Conjoint; Consumer preference; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONSUMER; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEAT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COMMERCE; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; HUMANS; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

COLUMBA;

EID: 80054757201     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02354.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada). 2005. Canadian food trends to 2010. A long range consumer outlook. Available from:.
2. AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada). 2006. Profile of the Canadian chicken industry. Chapter 6: the Canadian chicken market. Available from:.
3. Ahmed SW. 2006. Cost-benefit analysis of environmental goods by applying the contingent valuation method: some Japanese case studies. New York Springer. 159 p.
4. Alberini A, Boyle K, Welsh M. 2003. Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty. J Environ Econ Manag 45:40-62.
5. Ares G, Deliza R. 2010. Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Qual Prefer 21(8):930-7.
6. Bertrand, K. 2005. Microwavable foods satisfy need for speed and palatability. Food Tech 59(1):30-4.
7. Boughanmi H, Al-Musalami J, Al-Oufi H, Zaibet L. 2007. Estimating consumer preferences for value-added fish products in Oman: a conjoint analysis. J Food Prod Market 13(2):47-68.
8. Buzby JC, Farah HA. 2006. Chicken consumption continues longrun rise. Amber Waves (The Economics of Food Farming, Natural Resources and Rural America) 2010(August, 20):1.
9. Cardello AV, Schutz HG. 2003. The importance of taste and other product factors to consumer interest in nutraceutical products: civilian and military comparisons. J Food Sci 68(4):1519-24.
10. Castellini C, Berri C, Bihan-Duval L, Martino G. 2008. Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free-range poultry meat. World Poultry Sci J 64:500-12.
11. CFC (Chicken Farmers of Canada). 2009. 2008 Annual Report. Available from:.
12. Cranfield J, Magnusson E. 2003. Canadian consumer's willingness-to-pay for pesticide free food products: an ordered probit analysis. Int Food Agribusiness Manag Rev 6(4):13-30.
13. Davies A, Titterington AJ, Cochrane C. 1995. Who buys organic food? A profile in Northern Ireland. Brit Food J 97(10):17-23.
14. de Carlos P, Garcia M, de Felipe I, Briz J, Morais F. 2006. The development of an analytical tool for integrating 'the voice of the consumer' in new product development. Paper provided by European Association of Agricultural Economists in Its Series 98th Seminar, June 29 to July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece. Available from:.
15. Eales JS, Unnevehr LJ. 1988. Demand for beef and chicken products. Separability and structural-change. Am J Agric Econ 70(3):521-32.
16. Eales JS, Unnevehr LJ. 1993. Simultaneity and Structural Change in U.S. meat demand. Am J Agric Econ 75:260-8.
17. Gil JM, Gracia A, Sánchez M. 2000. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. Int Food Agribusiness Manag Rev 3:207-26.
18. Goddard E, Shank B, Panter C, Nilsson T, Cash S. 2007. Canadian chicken industry: consumer preferences, industry structure and producer benefits from investment in research and advertising. Electronic resource 07-041-126. Dept. of Rural Economy, University of Alberta. Available from:.
19. Government of Alberta. 2002, Organic consumer profile. Agriculture and Rural Development. Government of Alberta. Available from:.
20. Govindasamy R, Italia J. 1997. Predicting the influence of demographic characteristics on the willingness to pay for fresh fruits and vegetables: a logistic approach. J Food Prod Market 4(4):25-38.
21. Gracia A, de Magistris T. 2008. The demand for organic foods in South of Italy: a discrete choice model. Food Pol 33:386-96.
22. Green PE, Srinivasan V. 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research. Issues and outlook. J Consum Res 5(9):103-23.
23. Grunert KG. 2006. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Sci 74:149-60.
24. Haddad Y, Haddad J, Olabi A, Shuayto N, Haddad T, Toufeili I. 2007. Mapping determinants of purchase intent of concentrated yogurt (Labneh) by conjoint analysis. Food Qual Prefer 18:795-802.
25. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Hair B. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Prentice-Hall. 899 p.
26. Hanemann WM. 1984. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52(3):541-61.
27. Harrison RW, Özayan A, Meyers SP. 1998. A conjoint analysis of new food products processed from underutilized small crawfish. J Agric Appl Econ 30(2):257-65.
28. Henson S, Annou M, Cranfield J, Ryks J. 2008. Understanding consumer attitudes toward food technologies in Canada. Risk Anal 28(6):1601-17.
29. Herriges JA, Shogren JF. 1996. Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning. J Environ Econ Manag 30:112-31.
30. Howard PH, Allen P. 2008. Consumer willingness to pay for domestic "fair trade": evidence from the United States. Renew Agric Food Syst 23(3):235-42.
31. Huang CL, Wolfe K, McKissick J. 2007. Consumers' willingness to pay for irradiated poultry products. J Int Food Agribusiness Market 19(2/3):77-95.
32. Jabs J, Devine CM. 2006. Time scarcity and food choices: an overview. Appetite 47:196-204.
33. Lee C, Park S, Mjelde JW, Kim T, Cho J. 2008. Measuring the willingness to pay for a horticulture therapy site using a contingent valuation method. HortScience 43(6):1802-6.
34. Louviere JJ, Eagle TC, Cohen SH. 2005. Conjoint analysis: methods, myths and much more. CenSoC Working paper Nr 05-001. Available from:.
35. Magdelaine P, Spiess MP, Valceschini E. 2008. Poultry meat consumption trends in Europe. World Poultry Sci J 64:53-64.
36. Martínez Michel L, Punter PH, Wismer VW. 2011. Perceptual attributes of poultry and other meat products: a repertory grid application. Meat Sci 87(4):349-55.
37. Maynard LJ, Brudine KH, Meyer AL. 2003. Market potential for locally produced meat products. J Food Distribution Res 34(2):26-37.
38. Mintel. December 2008. Poultry products category insight. Available from:.
39. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, D.C. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Muñoz AM, Civille GV. 1987. Factors affecting perception and acceptance of food texture by American consumers. Food Rev Int 3(3):285-322.
41. National Farmers' Market Impact Study. 2009. Report. Experience Renewal Solutions Inc. Available from:.
42. Ollinger M, MacDonald J, Madison M. 2000. Structural change in U.S. chicken and turkey slaughter. Changes in poultry demand. AER-787(November):1-44. Available from:.
43. Paul CJM. 1999. Production structure and trends in the US meat and poultry products industries. J Agric Resour Econ 24(2):281-98.
44. Piggott NE, Marsh TL. 2004. Does food safety information impact U.S. meat demand? Am J Agric Econ 86(1):154-74.
45. Reynolds A, Goddard EW. 1991. Structural change in Canadian meat demand. Can J Agric Econ 39:211-22.
46. Rodríguez E, Lacaze V, Lupín B. 2008. Contingent valuation of consumers' willingness to pay for organic food in Argentina. Available from:.
47. Russell CG, Cox DN. 2004. Understanding middle-aged consumers' perceptions of meat using repertory grid methodology. Food Qual Prefer 15:317-29.
48. Sorenson D, Bogue J. 2005. A conjoint-based approach to concept optimisation: probiotic beverages. Br Food J 107(11):870-83.
49. Sorenson D, Bogue J. 2006. Modelling soft drink purchasers' preferences for stimulant beverages. Int J Food Sci Tech 41(6):704-11.
50. SPSS. 2005. SPSS Conjoint™ 14.0. Homepage of SPSS Inc. Available from:.
51. Statistics Canada. 2009. Community profiles from the 2006 Census. Results for Edmonton. Available from:.
52. Stewart L, Robbins L. 1986. Trends in consumption of animal products in Canada. Can J Anim Sci 66:11-21.
53. Tonsor GT, Mintert J, Schroeder TC. 2010. U.S. meat demand: household dynamics and media information impacts. J Agric Resource Econ 35:1-17.
54. Ureña F, Bernabéu R, Olmeda M. 2008. Women, men and organic food: differences in their attitudes and willingness to pay. A Spanish case study. Int J Consum Stud 32:18-26.
55. van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM, Luning P. 2005. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Qual Prefer 16:181-201.
56. van Kleef E. 2006. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development. Issues and applications in the food domain. PhD thesis, Wageningen Univ.. Available from:.
57. Walley K, Parsons S, Bland M. 1999. Quality assurance and the consumer. A conjoint study. Br Food J 101(2):148-61.
58. West GE, Gendron C, Larue B, Lambert R. 2005. Consumers' valuation of functional properties of foods: results from a Canada-wide survey. Can J Agric Econ 50(4):541-58.