Understanding consumer attitudes toward food technologies in Canada

Risk Analysis

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1601-1617

  Henson, Spencer ^a   Annou, Mamane ^a   Cranfield, John ^a   Ryks, Joanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Canada; Perceived benefit; Perceived risk; Technology

Indexed keywords

RISK PERCEPTION;

ATTITUDES; CANADA; CONSUMER ACCEPTABILITIES; CONSUMER ATTITUDES; GENERALIZED PROCRUSTES ANALYSIS; INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENTS; INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEIVED BENEFIT; PERCEIVED RISK; PERCEIVED RISKS; REPERTORY GRIDS;

TECHNOLOGY;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD SAFETY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RISK PERCEPTION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; FOOD HANDLING; HUMAN; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; FOOD; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTION; RISK; SOCIAL CLASS;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 55349121515     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01123.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Alhakami, A., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of attitudes. Risk Analysis, 14, 1085 1096.
2. Bastide, S., Moatti, J.-P., Pages, J.-P., & Fagnani, F. (1989). Risk perception and social acceptability of technologies: The French case. Risk Analysis, 9 (2 215 223.
3. Bech-Larsen, T., & Grunert, K. (2003). The perceived healthiness of functional foods: A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers' perception of functional foods. Appetite, 40, 9 14.
4. Bech-Larsen, T., Grunert, K. G., & Poulsen, J. B. (2001). The Acceptance of Functional Foods in Denmark, Finland and the United States. MAPP Working Paper, Aarhus School of Business.
5. Bell, R. C. (1990). Analytic issues in the use of repertory grid technique. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds. Advances in Personal Construct Psychology Volume 1 (pp. 25-48). Greenwich : JAI Press.
6. Bord, R. J., & O'Connor, R. E. (1990). Risk communication, knowledge and attitudes: Explaining reactions to a technology perceived as risky. Risk Analysis, 10 (4 499 505.
7. Breakwell, G. M., Fife-Schaw, C. R., Lee, T., & Spencer, J. (1986). Attitudes to new technology in relation to social beliefs and group memberships. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5, 34 47.
8. Breakwell, G. M., Fife-Schaw, C. R., Lee, B., & Spencer, J. (1987). Occupational aspirations and attitudes to new technology. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 169 172.
9. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, recent findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2 343 376.
10. Burrell, A. (2002). Consumers' reactions to rBST milk with and without labelling. TSL: Tijdschrift voor Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek can de Landbouw, 17, 7 20.
11. Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. (1983). Contemporary worldviews: Personal and policy implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 259 280.
12. Carlopio, J. (1988). A history of social psychological reactions to new technology. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 67 77.
13. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245 276.
14. Cooper, G. (1994). New products: The factors that drive success. International Marketing Review, 11 (1 60 76.
15. Cox, D. N., Koster, A., & Russell, C. G. (2004). Predicting intentions to consumer functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite, 43, 55 64.
16. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica, 16 (3 297 333.
17. DeSantis, J., & Youniss, J. (1991). Family contributions to adolescents' attitudes towards new technology. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6 (4 410 422.
18. De Vellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.
19. Dijksterhuis, G. B., & Gower, J. C. (1991). The Interpretation of Generalized Procrustes Analysis and Allied Methods. Leiden : University of Lediden.
20. Doern, B. G. (2000). Inside the Canadian Biotechnology Regulatory System: A Closer Exploratory Look. Prepared for the Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee Project Steering Committee on the Regulation of Genetically Modified Foods.
21. Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal Components Analysis. Newbury Park : Sage Publications.
22. Fife-Schaw, C. R., Breakwell, G. M., Lee, T., & Spencer, J. (1987). Attitudes towards new technology in relation to scientific orientation at school: A preliminary study of undergraduates. British Journal of Education Psychology, 57, 114 121.
23. Fife-Schaw, C. R., & Rowe, G. (1996). Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study. Risk Analysis, 16, 487 500.
24. Fife-Schaw, C., & Rowe, G. (2000). Extending the application of the psychometric approach for assessing public perceptions of food risk: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Risk Research, 3 (2 167 179.
25. Fischoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127 152.
26. Fox, J. A., Hayes, D. J., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Consumer preferences for food irradiation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 75 95.
27. Frenzen, P. D., DeBess, E. E., Hechemy, K. E., Kassenborg, H., Kennedy, M., McCombs, K., & McNees, A. (2001). Consumer acceptance of irradiated meat and poultry in the United States. Journal of Food Protection, 64 (12 2020 2026.
28. Frewer, L. J., Hedderley, D. Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997a) Objection mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering. Agriculture and Human Values, 14, 1 13.
29. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1997b). Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production: The mediating influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 271 280.
30. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997c). Public concerns about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit and ethics. Science, Technology and Human Values, 22, 98 124.
31. Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Shepherd, R. (1998). Understanding public attitudes to technology. Journal of Risk Research, 1 (3 221 235.
32. Frewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & Sparks, P. (1994). Biotechnology and food production: Knowledge and perceived risk. British Food Journal, 96, 26 32.
33. Frost, T. F., & Rogers, B. G. (1985). Attitudes towards technology and religion among collegiate undergraduates. Psychological Reports, 56 (3 943 946.
34. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Torgersen, H., Hampel, J., & Bardes, J. (2004). GM foods and the misperceptions of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 24 (1 185 194.
35. Gower, J. C. (1975). Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrica, 40, 33 51.
36. Gower, J. C., & Dijksterhuis, G. B. (2004). Procrustes Problems. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
37. Greene, W. (2000). Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice Hall.
38. Grobe, D., & Douthill, R. (1995). Consumer acceptance of recombinant bovine growth hormone: Interplay between beliefs and perceived risks. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29 (1 128 143.
39. Grobe, D., Douthitt, R., & Zepeda, L. (1999). A model of consumers' risk perceptions towards recombinant bovine growth hormone (RbGH): The impact of risk characteristics. Risk Analysis, 19 (4 661 673.
40. Gupta, A. K., & Wilemon, D. J. (1990). Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California Management Review, Winter, 24 44.
41. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice Hall.
42. Hallman, W. K., Hebden, W. C., Aquino, H. L., Cuite, C. L., & Lang, J. T. (2003). Public Perceptions of Genetically Modified Foods: A National Study of American Knowledge and Opinion. New Brunswick, NJ : Food Policy Institute, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey.
43. Hallman, W. K., Hebden, W. C., Cuite, C. L., Aquino, H. L., & Lang, J. T. (2004). Americans and GM Food: Knowledge, Opinion and Interest in 2004. New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey.
44. Hashim, I. B., Resurreccion, A. V., & McWatters, K. H. (1995). Consumer acceptance of irradiated poultry. Poultry Science, 74, 1287 1294.
45. Hayes, D. J., Fox, J. A., & Shogen, J. F. (2002). Experts and activists: How information affects the demand for food irradiation. Food Policy, 27, 185 193.
46. Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15, 373 388.
47. Jackson, L. M., & Yamana, E. (1985). Measuring women's attitudes, goals and literacy toward computers and advanced technology. Educational Technology, 25, 12 14.
48. James, K. (1993). Enhancing the perceived self-reliance of technology to influence attitudes and information retention. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29 (1 56 75.
49. Jankowicz, A. D. (1990). Applications of personal construct psychology in business practice. In G. Neimeyer & R. Neimeyer (Eds. Advances in Personal Construct Psychology. Connecticut : JAI Press.
50. Jankowicz, A. D. (2003). The Easy Guide to Repertory Grids. Chichester : John Wiley.
51. Jolliffe, I. T. (1986). Principal Component Analysis. New York : Springer-Verlag.
52. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141 151.
53. Kraus, N., & Slovic, P. (1988). Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: Modelling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Analysis, 8, 435 455.
54. Kristensen, K., Osergaard, P., & Juhl, H. J. (1997). The Success and Failure of Product Development in the Danish Food Sector. MAPP Working Paper, Aarhus School of Business.
55. Kuklinski, J., Metlay, D., & Kay, W. (1982). Citizen knowledge and choices in the complex issue of nuclear energy. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 615 642.
56. Labreque, J., Doyon, M., Bellavance, F., & Kolodinsky, M. (2006). Acceptance of functional foods: A comparison of French, American, and French Canadian consumers. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 647 661.
57. Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists. San Francisco : Josey-Bass.
58. Lucknow, T., & Delehunty, C. (2004). Consumer acceptance of orange juice containing functional ingredients. Food Research International, 37, 805 814.
59. MacGregor, D., & Slovic, P. (1986). Perceived acceptability of risk analysis as a decision-making approach. Risk Analysis, 6, 245 256.
60. Maharik, M., & Fischoff, B. (1993). Risk knowledge and risk attitudes regarding nuclear energy sources in space. Risk Analysis, 13, 345 353.
61. Makela, J., & Niva, M. (2002). Changing Views of Healthy Eating: Cultural Acceptability of Functional Foods in Finland. Paper presented at Nordisk Sociologkongress, Iceland.
62. Malla, S., Hobbs, J. E., & Perger, O. (2007). Valuing the benefits of a novel functional food. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55 (1 115 136.
63. Malone, J. W. (1990). Consumer willingness to purchase and pay more for potential benefits of irradiated fresh food products. Agribusiness, 6, 163 177.
64. Mathews, J., Breakwell, G., & Fife-Schaw, C. R. (1989). Young people's attitudes to new technology in Devon: An element in regional growth potential. Geoforum, 21 (1 27 35.
65. Neimeyer, G. J. (1993). Constructivist Assessment. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
66. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill : New York.
67. Pacey, A. C. (1983). The Culture of Technology. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
68. Payne, R. W., & Lane, P. W. (2006). GENSTAT Release 9 Reference Manual - Procedure Library. VSN International.
69. Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (1996). The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1427 1453.
70. Poortinga, W. (2005). The use of multi-level modelling in risk research. A secondary analysis of a study of public perceptions of genetically-modified food. Journal of Risk Research, 8 (7-8 583 597.
71. Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2004). Public Perceptions of Genetically Modified Food and Crops, and the GM Nation? Public Debate on the Commercialization of Agricultural Biotechnology in the UK. Norwich : Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East Anglia.
72. Punj, G., & D. W. Stewart 1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 134 148.
73. Raats, M. M., & Shepherd, R. (1996). Developing a subject derived terminology to describe perceptions of chemicals in food. Risk Analysis, 16, 133 136.
74. Rouse, A. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Barke, R. P. (1991). The Origins of Perceptions of Environmental Risks: A Comparative Study of Elite and Mass Beliefs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle.
75. Siegrist, M. (1998). Belief in gene technology: The influence of environmental attitudes and gender. Personality and Individual Difference, 24 (6 861 866.
76. Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20 (2 195 203.
77. Siegrist, M., Keller, C., & Kiers, H. A. K. (2005). A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazard. Risk Analysis, 25 (1 211 221.
78. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280 285.
79. Slovic, P. (1992). Perceptions of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In D. Golding & S. Krimsky (Eds. Social Theories of Risk (pp. 117-152). Wesport : Greenwood.
80. Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In R. Schwing & W. A. Albers (Eds. Social Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough? (pp. 181-213) New York : Plenum Press.
81. Slovic, P., Kraus, N. N., Lappe, H., & Major, M. (1991). Risk perception of prescription drugs: Reports on a survey in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 82, S15 S20.
82. Smith, B. J., & Warland, R. H. (1992). Consumer responses to milk from BST-supplemented cows. In M. C. Hallberg (Ed. Bovine Somatropin and Emerging Issues: An Assessment (pp. 243-264). Boulder : Westview Press.
83. Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1994). Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 14, 799 806.
84. Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction. Basic management. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed. Basic Measurement (pp. 229-230). Newbury Park : Sage Publications.
85. Starr, C. (1989). Social benefits versus technological risk. Science, 165, 1232 1238.
86. Steger, M. A. E., Pierce, J. C., Steel, B. S., & Lovrich, N. P. (1989). Political culture, postmaterial values and the new environmental paradigm: A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States. Political Behaviour, 11, 233 254.
87. Townsend, E., & Campbell, S. (2004). Psychological determinants of willingness to taste and purchase genetically modified food. Risk Analysis, 24 (5 1385 1393.
88. Turner, R. S. (2001). Of milk and mandarins: rBST, mandated science and the Canadian regulatory style. Journal of Canadian Studies, 36, 107 131.
89. Verbeke, W. (2005). Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 45 57.
90. Verbeke, W. (2006). Functional foods: Willingness to compromise on taste for health? Food Quality and Preference, 17, 126 131.
91. Wagner, W., Torgerson, H., Einsiedel, E., Jelsoe, E., Frederickson, H., & Laseen, J. (1997). Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature, 387, 845 847.
92. West, G. E., Gendron, C., Larue, B., & Lambert, R. (2002). Consumers' valuation of functional properties of foods: Results from a Canada-wide survey. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50, 541 558.
93. Zechendorf, B. (1994). What the public thinks about biotechnology. Biotechnology, 12, 870 875.