Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 304-314

  Engelhardt, Paul E ^a   Baris Demiral S ^b   Ferreira, Fernanda ^c  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjective; Maxim of Quantity; N400; Over description; Pre nominal modifier; Semantic integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MAXIM OF QUANTITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 80054065905     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altmann G.T., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
2. Arts, A. (2004). Overspecification in instructive texts. Doctoral dissertation, Tillburg University.
3. Arts A., Maes A., Noordman L., Jansen C. Overspecification facilitates object identification. Journal of Pragmatics 2011, 43:361-374.
4. Belke E. Visual determinants of preferred adjective order. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:261-294.
5. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective 2009, Oxford University Press.
6. Cohen, Y. (1981). Internal and external control of orienting. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
7. Davies C., Katsos N. Are interlocuters as sensitive to over-informativeness as they are to under-informativeness? PRE-CogSci workshop: Production of referring expressions 2009, Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX.
8. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent components analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
9. Demiral S., Schlesewsky M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I. On the universality of language comprehension strategies: Evidence from Turkish. Cognition 2008, 106:484-500.
10. Deutsch W., Pechmann T. Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition 1982, 11:159-184.
11. Engelhardt, P. E. (2008). Generalized implicatures: Do uniformative environments eliminate default interpretations? Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
12. Engelhardt P.E., Bailey K.G.D., Ferreira F. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean maxim of quantity. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 54:554-573.
13. Engelhardt P.E., Xiang M., Ferreira F. Anticipatory eye movements mediated by word order constraints. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2008, 951-957. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
14. Ericksen C.W., Hoffman J.E. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:155-160.
15. Federmeier K.D., Kutas M. A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:469-495.
16. Ferris C. The meaning of syntax: A study of adjectives in English 1993, Longman, London & New York.
17. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:78-84.
18. Friederici A.E., Hahne A., Meklinger A. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1219-1248.
19. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts. (Vol. III, pp. 41-58).
20. Grice P. Studies in the ways of words 1989, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Grodner D., Sedivy J. The effects of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. The processing and acquisition of reference 2011, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. N. Pearlmutter, E. Gibson (Eds.).
22. Hagoort P., Brown C.M., Osterhout L. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. The neurocognition of language 1999, 273-316. Oxford University Press, Oxford. C.M. Brown, P. Hagoort (Eds.).
23. Kamp H. Two theories about adjectives. Formal semantics for natural languages 1975, 123-155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. E.L. Keenan (Ed.).
24. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:463-470.
25. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 2011, 62:621-647.
26. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207:203-205.
27. Kutas M., Van Petten C.K., Kluender R. Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005). Handbook of psycholinguistics 2006, 61-91. Elsevier Inc., Oxford, UK. M. Traxler, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
28. Lau E.F., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 2008, 9:920-933.
29. Lau E.F., Stroud C., Plesch S., Phillips C. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language 2006, 98:74-88.
30. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: From intention to articulation 1989, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
31. Maes A., Arts A., Noordman L. Reference management in instructive discourse. Discourse Processes 2004, 37:117-144.
32. Mountcastle V.B. Brain mechanisms of directed attention. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1978, 71:14-28.
33. Nieuwland M.S., Van Berkum J.A. The neurocognition of referential ambiguity in language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 2008, 2:603-630.
34. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:785-806.
35. Pechmann T. Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics 1989, 27:89-110.
36. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:2-25.
37. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X 1984, 531-556. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd., Hove, UK. H. Bouma, D.G. Bowhuis (Eds.).
38. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
39. Rugg M.D., Coles M.G.H. Electrophysiology of mind 1997, Vol. 25. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
40. Sedivy J.C. Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:3-23.
41. Sedivy J.C. Evaluating explanations for referential context effects: Evidence for Gricean mechanisms in online language interpretation. Approaches to world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (learning, development, and conceptual change) 2006, 345-364. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. J.C. Trueswell, M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.).
42. Sedivy J. Implicature during real time conversation: A view from language processing research. Philosophy Compass 2007, 2:475-496.
43. Sedivy J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Chambers C.G., Carlson G.N. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual interpretation. Cognition 1999, 71:109-147.
44. Siegel M. Capturing the adjective 1980, Garland, New York.
45. Sonnenschein S. The effect of redundant communication on listeners: Why different types have different effects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1984, 13:147-166.
46. Spence C., Driver J. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception and Psychophysics 1997, 59:1-22.
47. Staub A., Clifton C. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either...or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:425-436.
48. Van Berkum J.A. Understanding sentences in context. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:376-380.
49. Van Berkum J.A., Brown C.M., Hagoort P., Zwitserlood P. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:235-248.
50. Van Berkum J.A., Hagoort P., Brown C.M. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:657-671.
51. Van Berkum J.A., Koornneef A.W., Otten M., Nieuwland M.S. Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research 2007, 1146:158-171.