The neurocognition of referential ambiguity in language comprehension

Linguistics and Language Compass

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 603-630

  Niewland, Mante S ^a   Van Berkum, Jos J A ^b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65349152723     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749818X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00070.x     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Almor, A. 1999. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review 106.748-65.
2. Altmann, G., and M. Steedman. 1988. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30.191-238.
3. Altmann, G. T. M., and Y. Kamide. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73.247-64.
4. Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London, UK: Routledge.
5. Auer, J. C. P. 1984. Referential problems in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 8.627-48.
6. Bookheimer, S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25.151-88.
7. Brennan, S. E., and H. H. Clark. 1996. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Learning Memory and Cognition 22.1482-93.
8. Brown-Schmidt, S., C. Gunlogson, and M. K. Tanenhaus. 2008. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition 107(3).1122-34.
9. Brown-Schmidt, S., and M. K. Tanenhaus. forthcoming. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science.
10. Brysbaert, M., and D. C. Mitchell. 1996. Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A.664-95.
11. Caplan, D., and G. S. Waters. 1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.77-94.
12. Chambers, C. G., M. K. Tanenhaus, K. M. Eberhard, H. Filip, and G. N. Carlson. 2002. Circumscribing referential domains during real time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 47.30-49.
13. Clark, H. H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Clark, H. H. 1977. Bridging. Thinking: Readings in cognitive science, ed. by P. N. Johnson-Laird and P. C. Wason, 411-420. London, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clark, H. H., and D. Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22.1-39.
16. Clark, H. H., and C. J. Sengul. 1979. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition 7.35-41.
17. Cooper, R. 1974. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. Cognitive Psychology 6.84-107.
18. Crain, S., and M. Steedman. 1985. On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, ed. by D. Dowty, L. Karttunen and A. Zwicky, 320-58. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Daneman, M., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. Individual-differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19.450-66.
20. Donnellan, K. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75.281-304.
21. Engle, R. W. 2002. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11.19-23.
22. Ferreira, F., and C. Clifton, Jr. 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25.348-68.
23. Ferstl, E. C. 2007. The functional neuronatomy of text comprehension: What's the story so far? Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain: inference and comprehension Processes, ed. by F. Schmalhofer and C. A. Perfetti, 53-102. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Ferstl, E. C., and F. Th. Siebörger. 2007. Neuroimaging studies of coherence processes. Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference, (SLCS = Studies in Language Companion Series Vol. 86) ed. by M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten and M. Knees, 225-40. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
25. Ferstl, E. C., J. Neumann, C. Bogler, and D. Y. von Cramon. 2008. The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 29.581-93.
26. Fletcher, P. C., and R. N. A. Henson. 2001. Frontal lobes and human memory - insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain 124.849-81.
27. Frank, S. L., M. Koppen, L. G. M. Noordman, and W. Vonk. 2007. Coherence-driven resolution of referential ambiguity: A computational model. Memory & Cognition 35.1307-22.
28. Frege, G. 1892. On sense and nominatum. The philosophy of language, 2nd edn., reprinted in 1990, ed. by A. P. Martinich, 190-202. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29. Friederici, A. D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6.78-84.
30. Garnham, A. 1981. Mental models as representations of text. Memory and Cognition 9.560-65.
31. Garnham, A. 2001. Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.
32. Garrod, S. C., and A. J. Sanford. 1994. Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Gernsbacher, 675-98. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Garrod, S. C., and A. J. Sanford. 1999. Incrementality in discourse understanding. The construction of mental representations during reading, ed. by H. van Oostendorp and S. Goldman, 1-27. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Garrod, S. C., and A. J. Sanford. 1977. Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16.77-90.
35. Garvey, C., and A. Caramazza. 1974. Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 5.459-64.
36. Gernsbacher, M. A. 1989. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition 32.99-156.
37. Gordon, P. C., and R. Hendrick. 1998. The representation and processing of coreference in discourse. Cognitive Science 22.389-424.
38. Gordon, P. E., R. Hendrick, and K. L. Foster. 2000. Language comprehension and probe list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26.766-75.
39. Graesser, A. C., K. K. Millis, and R. A. Zwaan. 1997. Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology 48.163-89.
40. Greene, S. B., G. McKoon, and R. Ratcliff. 1992. Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 18 266-83.
41. Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21.203-25.
42. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics: Volume 3, Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan. New York: Academic Press.
43. Guerry, M., M. Gimenes, D. Caplan, and F. Rigalleau. 2006. How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59.1535-55.
44. Hagoort, P. 2003. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15.883-99.
45. Hanna, J. E., and M. K. Tanenhaus. 2004. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 28.105-15.
46. Hanna, J. E., M. K. Tanenhaus, and J. C. Trueswell. 2003. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 49.43-61.
47. Harris, T., K. Wexler, and P. J. Holcomb. 2000. An ERP investigation of binding and coreference. Brain & Language 75.313-46.
48. Hobbs, J. R. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3.67-90.
49. Huettel, S. A., A. W. Song, and G. McCarthy. 2004. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
50. Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Jarvikivi, J., R. P. G. van Gompel, J. Hyöna, and R. Bertram. 2005. Ambiguous pronoun resolution - contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science 16.260-4.
52. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Jung-Beeman, M. 2005. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9.512-8.
54. Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension - individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99.122-49.
55. Keysar, B., D. J. Barr, J. A. Balin, and J. S. Brauner. 2000. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11.32-7.
56. Kintsch, W. 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review 95.163-82.
57. Kintsch, W. 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58. Klin, C. M., K. M. Weingartner, A. E. Guzmán, and W. H. Levine. 2004. Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution. Memory & Cognition 32.511-22.
59. Koornneef, A. W., and J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2006. On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 54.445-65.
60. Kuperberg, G. R., P. J. Holcomb, T. Sitnikova, D. Greve, A. M. Dale, and D. Caplan. 2003. Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15.272-93.
61. Kuperberg, G. R., B. M. Lakshmanan, D. N. Caplan, and P. J. Holcomb. 2006. Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. Neuroimage 33.343-61.
62. Kutas, M. 1997. Presidential address, 1996 - views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. Psychophysiology 34.383-98.
63. Kutas, M., and S. A. Hillyard. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207(4427).203-205.
64. Kutas, M., and C. K. Van Petten. 1994. Psycholinguistics electrified: event-related brain potential investigations. Handbook of psycholinguistics, xxii, 1174 pp, ed. by M. A. Gernsbacher, 83-143. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65. Levine, W. H., A. E. GuzmÁn, and C. M. Klin. 2000. When anaphor resolution fails. Journal of Memory and Language 43.594-617.
66. Logothetis, N. K., and B. A. Wandell. 2004. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annual Review of Physiology 66.735-69.
67. MacDonald, M., and B. MacWhinney. 1990. Measuring inhibition and facilitation in pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 29.469-92.
68. MacDonald, M. C., and M. H. Christiansen. 2002. Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109.35-54.
69. Martinich, A. P. 1990. The philosophy of language, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70. Mason, R. A., and M. A. Just. 2006. Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn., ed. by M. Traxler and M. A. Gernsbacher, 765-99. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
71. McKoon, G., and R. Ratcliff. 1980. The Comprehension Processes and Memory Structures Involved in Anaphoric Reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19.668-82.
72. McKoon, G., G. Ward, R. Ratcliff, and R. Sproat. 1993. Morphosyntactic and pragmatic factors affecting the accessibility of discourse entities. Journal of Memory and Language 32.56-75.
73. Montague, R. 1974. Formal philosophy. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
74. Myers, J. L., and E. J. O'Brien. 1998. Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes 26.131-57.
75. Nadig, A., and J. Sedivy. 2002. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13.329-36.
76. Ni, W., R. T. Constable, W. E. Mencl, K. R. Pugh, R. K. Fulbright, S. E. Shaywitz, B. A. Shaywitz, J. C. Gore, and D. Shankweiler. 2000. An event-related neuroimaging study distinguishing form and content in sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12.120-33.
77. Nieuwland, M. S., and J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2006. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research 1118.155-67.
78. Nieuwland, M. S., and J. J. A. Van Berkum. forthcoming. The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain and Language.
79. Nieuwland, M. S., M. Otten, and J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2007a. Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19.228-36.
80. Nieuwland, M. S., K. M. Petersson, and J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2007b. On sense and reference: Examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing. Neuroimage 37.993-1004.
81. Novick, J. M., J. C. Trueswell, and S. L. Thompson-Schill. 2005. Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 5.263-81.
82. O'Doherty, J. P., A. Hampton, and H. Kim. 2007. Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1104.35-53.
83. Osterhout, L. 1997. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language 59.494-522.
84. Osterhout, L., and P. J. Holcomb. 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31.785-806.
85. Osterhout, L., and L. A. Mobley. 1995. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34.739-73.
86. Osterhout, L., P. J. Holcomb, and D. A. Swinney. 1994. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 20.786-803.
87. Partee, B. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, ed. by J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof, 115-44. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
88. Rayner, K., M. Carlson, and L. Frazier. 1983. The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22.358-74.
89. Reichle, E. D., and R. A. Mason. 2007. The neural signatures of causal inferences: A preliminary computational account of brain-imaging and behavioral data. Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes, ed. by F. Schmalhofer and C. A. Perfetti, 211-32. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Rigalleau, F., D. Caplan, and V. Baudiffier. 2004. New arguments in favour of an automatic gender pronominal process. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 57.893-933.
91. Rugg, M. D. and M. G. H. Coles. 1997. Electrophysiology of mind, Vol 25. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
92. Sanford, A. J., and S. C. Garrod. 1989. What, when, and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 4.SI235-62.
93. Sedivy, J. 2002. Invoking discourse-based contrast sets and resolving syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language 341-70.
94. Sanford, A. J., and S. C. Garrod. 2003. Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 21.3-23.
95. Sedivy, J. C., M. K. Tanenhaus, C. G. Chambers, and G. N. Carlson. 1999. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition 71.109-48.
96. Spivey-Knowlton, M., and M. K. Tanenhaus. 1994. Referential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Perspectives on sentence processing, ed. by C. Clifton, L. Frazier and K. Rayner, 415-39. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
97. Spivey, M. J., M. K. Tanenhaus, K. M. Eberhard, and J. C. Sedivy. 2002. Eye-movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 45.447-81.
98. Stewart, A. J., J. Holler, and E. Kidd. 2007. Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: Evidence for delay. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60.1680-96.
99. Swaab, T. Y., C. C. Camblin, and P. C. Gordon. 2004. Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16.715-26.
100. Tanenhaus, M. K., M. J. Spivey-Knowlton, K. M. Eberhard, and J. C. Sedivy. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268.1632-4.
101. Trueswell, J. C., and M. K. Tanenhaus. 2005. Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102. Van Berkum, J. J. A. 2004. Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse: can we use ERPs to keep track of things? The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond, ed. by M. Carreiras and C. Clifton, Jr, 229-70. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
103. Van Berkum, J. J. A., C. M. Brown, and P. Hagoort. 1999. Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 41.147-82.
104. Van Berkum, J. J. A., C. M. Brown, P. Hagoort, and P. Zwitserlood. 2003. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology 40.235-48.
105. Van Berkum, J. J. A., P. Zwitserlood, M. C. M. Bastiaansen, C. M. Brown, and P. Hagoort. 2004. So who's 'he' anyway? Differential ERP and ERSP effects of referential success, ambiguity and failure during spoken language comprehension. Annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society (CNS-2004), San Francisco, April 18-20.
106. Van Berkum, J. J. A., A. W. Koornneef, M. Otten, and M. S. Neuwland. 2007. Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research 1146.158-71.
107. Wagner, A. D., B. J. Shannon, I. Kahn, and R. L. Buckner. 2005. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9.445-53.
108. Zwaan, R. A., and G. A. Radvansky. 1998. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123.162-85.
109. Zysset, S., O. Huber, A. Samson, E. C. Ferstl, and D. Y. von Cramon. 2003. Functional specialization within the anterior medial prefrontal cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study with human subjects. Neuroscience Letters 335.183-6.