Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated by locked plating: Feasibility assessment of the mini-invasive surgical option. A prospective series of 36 fractures

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 622-628

  Ehlinger, M ^a   Adam, P ^a   Di Marco, A ^a   Arlettaz, Y ^b   Moor, B K ^b   Bonnomet, F ^a  

^a HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

^b Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculo skeletal Traumatology   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Femoral fracture; Locking plate; Mini invasive; Peri prosthetic fracture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HUMAN; INFECTION; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PARKER SCORE; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PLATE FIXATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE PLATES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 80054026788     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18770568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bégué T., Thomazeau H., Adam P., et al. Fractures péri-prothétiques autour des prothèses du genou et de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 2006, 92(Suppl.):S29-S96.
2. Ehlinger M., Cognet J.M., Simon P. Traitement des fractures fémorales sur matériel par voie mini-invasive et remise en charge immédiate: apport des plaques à vis bloquées (LCP). Série préliminaires. Rev Chir Orthop 2008, 94:26-36.
3. Parker M., Palmer C. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993, 75:797-798.
4. Duncan C.P., Masri B.A. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 1995, 44:293-304.
5. Tricoire J.L., Vogt F., Lafosse J.M. Classification radiologique des fractures autour des PTG. Rev Chir Orthop 2006, 92(Suppl.):S57-S60.
6. Mabit C., Gougam T., Thomazeau, et al. Méthodologie et étude épidémiologique. Rev Chir Orthop 2006, 92(Suppl.):S40-S43.
7. Ricci W.M., Borrelli J. Operative management of periprosthetic femur fractures in the elderly using biological fracture reduction and fixation techniques. Injury 2007, 38:553-558.
8. Kobbe P., Klemm R., Reilmann H., Hockertz T.J. Less invasive stabilization system (LISS) for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up. Injury 2008, 39:472-479.
9. Masri B.A., Meek R.M., Duncan C.P. Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 420:80-95.
10. Klein G.R., Parvizi J., Rapuri V., et al. Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005, 87:1777-1781.
11. Zdero R., Walker R., Waddell J.P., Shemitsch E.H. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008, 90:1068-1077.
12. Buttaro M.A., Farfalli G., Parades Nunez P., Comba F., Piccaluga F. Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007, 89:1964-1969.
13. Kregor P.J., Stannard J.A., Zlowodzki M., Cole P.A. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004, 18:509-520.
14. Brilhaut J., Burdin P. Suivi prospectif des fractures péri-protétiques sur prothèses totales de genou: modalités de prise en charge et résultats à 6 mois. Rev Chir Orthop 2006, 92(Suppl.):S74-S79.
15. Wick M., Muller E.J., Kutscha-Lissberg F., Hopf F., Muhr G. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: LISS or retrograde intramedullary nailing? Problems with the use of minimally minivasive technique. Unfallchirurg 2004, 107:181-188.
16. Berlusconi M., Accetta R., Pascale V., Pagani A., Mineo G. Locking compression for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the hip. J Orthop Trauma 2004, 18(Suppl. 9):S20.
17. Kregor P.J., Hugues J.L., Cole P.A. Fixation of distal femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Injury 2001, 32(Suppl. 3):SC64-SC75.
18. Perren S.M. Evolution of the fixation of long bones fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002, 84:1093-1110.
19. Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003, 34(Suppl. 2):31-42.
20. Farouk O., Krettek C., Miclau T., et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneus plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique?. J Orthop Trauma 1999, 13:401-406.
21. Chakravarthy J., Bansal R., Cooper J. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B1 and type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients. Injury 2007, 38:725-733.
22. Kumar V., Kanabar P., Owen P.J., Rushton N. Less invasive stabilization system for the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:446-450.
23. Fulkerson E., Tejwani N., Stuchlin S., Egol K. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate. Injury 2007, 38:965-972.
24. Curral V., Thomasson K., Eastaugh-Waring S., Ward A.J., Chesser T.J. The use of LISS femoral locking plates and cabling in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around stable proximal femoral implants in elderly patients. Hip Int 2008, 18:207-211.
25. Dougherty P.J., Kim D.G., Meisterling S., Wybo C., Yeni Y. Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric model. J Orthop Trauma 2008, 22:399-403.
26. Button G., Wolinsky P., Hack D. Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur. A report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma 2004, 18:565-570.
27. Ahmad M., Nanda R., Bajwa A.S., Candal-Couto J., Green S., Hui A.C. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bon and implant significantly educe construct stability?. Injury 2007, 38:358-364.
28. Stoffel K., Lorenz K.U., Kuster M.S. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability. J Orthop Trauma 2007, 21:362-368.
29. Bottlang M., Doornink J., Byrd G.D., Fitzpatrick D.C., Madey S.M. A nonlocking end screwcan decrease fracture risk caused by locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2009, 91:620-627.
30. Wilkens K.J., Curtiss S., Lee M.A. Polyaxial plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison. J Orthop Trauma 2008, 22:624-628.