GROMOS++ software for the analysis of biomolecular simulation trajectories

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 3379-3390

  Eichenberger, Andreas P ^a   Allison, Jane R ^a   Dolenc, Jožica ^a,d   Geerke, Daan P ^c   Horta, Bruno A C ^a   Meier, Katharina ^a   Oostenbrink, Chris ^b   Schmid, Nathan ^a   Steiner, Denise ^a   Wang, Dongqi ^a   Van Gunsteren, Wilfred F ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054003196     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct2003622     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. van Gunsteren, W. F.; Bakowies, D.; Baron, R.; Chandrasekhar, I.; Christen, M.; Daura, X.; Gee, P.; Geerke, D. P.; Glättli, A.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Kastenholz, M. A.; Oostenbrink, C.; Schenk, M.; Trzesniak, D.; van der Vegt, N. F. A.; Yu, H. B. Biomolecular modeling: Goals, problems, perspectives Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4064
2. Scheraga, H. A.; Khalili, M.; Liwo, A. Protein-folding dynamics: Overview of molecular simulation techniques Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58, 57
3. van Gunsteren, W. F.; Dolenc, J. Biomolecular simulation: Historical picture and future perspectives Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2008, 36, 11
4. Lindahl, E.; Sansom, M. S. P. Membrane proteins: Molecular dynamics simulations Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 425
5. Khalili-Araghi, F.; Gumbart, J.; Wen, P.-C.; Sotomayor, M.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Schulten, K. Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane channels and transporters Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19, 128
6. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E.; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The AMBER biomolecular simulation programs J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668
7. Brooks, B. R.; Brooks, C. L., III; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Nilsson, L.; Petrella, R. J.; Roux, B.; Won, Y.; Archontis, G.; Bartels, C.; Boresch, S.; Caflisch, A.; Caves, L.; Cui, Q.; Dinner, A. R.; Feig, M.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Hodoscek, M.; Im, W.; Kuczera, K.; Lazaridis, T.; Ma, J.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Paci, E.; Pastor, R. W.; Post, C. B.; Pu, J. Z.; Schaefer, M.; Tidor, B.; Venable, R. M.; Woodcock, H. L.; Wu, X.; Yang, W.; York, D. M.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 1545
8. Bowers, K. J.; Chow, E.; Huageng Xu; Dror, R. O.; Eastwood, M. P.; Gregersen, B. A.; Klepeis, J. L.; Kolossvary, I.; Moraes, M. A.; Sacerdoti, F. D.; Salmon, J. K.; Shan, Y.; Shaw, D. E. Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06), Tampa, FL, 2006.
9. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. Gromacs 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435
10. Christen, M.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Bakowies, D.; Baron, R.; Bürgi, R.; Geerke, D. P.; Heinz, T. N.; Kastenholz, M. A.; Kräutler, V.; Oostenbrink, C.; Peter, C.; Trzesniak, D.; van Gunsteren, W. F. The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05 J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1719
11. Banks, J. L.; Beard, H. S.; Cao, Y. X.; Cho, A. E.; Damm, W.; Farid, R.; Felts, A. K.; Halgren, T. A.; Mainz, D. T.; Maple, J. R.; Murphy, R.; Philipp, D. M.; Repasky, M. P.; Zhang, L. Y.; Berne, B. J.; Friesner, R. A.; Gallicchio, E.; Levy, R. M. Integrated modeling program, applied chemical theory (IMPACT) J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1752
12. Lee, F. S.; Chu, Z. T.; Warshel, A. Microscopic and semimicroscopic calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins by the POLARIS and ENZYME programs J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 161
13. Chu, Z. T.; Villa, J.; Strajbl, M.; Schutz, C. N.; Shurki, A.; Washel, A. MOLARIS v. beta9.05; University of Southern California, 2002.
14. Phillips, J. C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R. D.; Kale, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781
15. TINKER - Software tools for molecular design, http://dasher.wustl.edu/ tinker (visited on August 4, 2011).
16. Ponder, J. W.; Case, D. A. Force fields for protein simulations. In Protein Simulations; Academic Press Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2003; pp 27.
17. Cheatham, T. E.; Young, M. A. Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids: Successes, limitations, and promise Biopolymers 2000, 56, 232
18. MacKerell, A. D.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R. L.; Evanseck, J. D.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.; Kuchnir, L.; Kuczera, K.; Lau, F. T. K.; Mattos, C.; Michnick, S.; Ngo, T.; Nguyen, D. T.; Prodhom, B.; Reiher, W. E.; Roux, B.; Schlenkrich, M.; Smith, J. C.; Stote, R.; Straub, J.; Watanabe, M.; Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J.; Yin, D.; Karplus, M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586
19. MacKerell, A. D.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1400
20. Chen, J. H.; Im, W. P.; Brooks, C. L. Balancing solvation and intramolecular interactions: Toward a consistent generalized born force field J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3728
21. MacKerell, A. D.; Banavali, N.; Foloppe, N. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids Biopolymers 2000, 56, 257
22. Vanommeslaeghe, K.; Hatcher, E.; Acharya, C.; Kundu, S.; Zhong, S.; Shim, J.; Darian, E.; Guvench, O.; Lopes, P.; Vorobyov, I.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 671
23. Patel, S.; MacKerell, A. D.; Brooks, C. L. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1504
24. Lamoureux, G.; Roux, B. Modeling induced polarization with classical drude oscillators: Theory and molecular dynamics simulation algorithm J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 3025
25. Lamoureux, G.; Harder, E.; Vorobyov, I. V.; Roux, B.; MacKerell, A. D. A polarizable model of water for molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 418, 245
26. Arnautova, Y. A.; Jagielska, A.; Scheraga, H. A. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 5025
27. Levitt, M.; Hirshberg, M.; Sharon, R.; Daggett, V. Potential-energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular-dynamics of proteins and nucleic-acids in solution Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 215
28. Warshel, A. Computer Modeling of Chemical Reactions in Enzymes and Solution; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1991.
29. Schuler, L. D.; Daura, X.; van Gunsteren, W. F. An improved GROMOS96 force field for aliphatic hydrocarbons in the condensed phase J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1205
30. Chandrasekhar, I.; Kastenholz, M.; Lins, R. D.; Oostenbrink, C.; Schuler, L. D.; Tieleman, D. P.; van Gunsteren, W. F. A consistent potential energy parameter set for lipids: Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine as a benchmark of the GROMOS96 45A3 force field Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. 2003, 32, 67
31. Soares, T. A.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Kastenholz, M. A.; Kräutler, V.; Lenz, T.; Lins, R. D.; Oostenbrink, C.; van Gunsteren, W. F. An improved nucleic acid parameter set for the GROMOS force field J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 725
32. Lins, R. D.; Hünenberger, P. H. A new GROMOS force field for hexopyranose-based carbohydrates J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1400
33. Oostenbrink, C.; Villa, A.; Mark, A. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1656
34. Poger, D.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Mark, A. E. A new force field for simulating phosphatidylcholine bilayers J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 1117
35. Schmid, N.; Eichenberger, A. P.; Choutko, A.; Riniker, S.; Winger, M.; Mark, A. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions: 54A7 and 54B7 Eur. Biophys. J. 2011, 40, 843
36. Jorgensen, W. L.; Maxwell, D. S.; Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11225
37. Kaminski, G. A.; Friesner, R. A.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6474
38. Scott, W. R. P.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Tironi, I. G.; Mark, A. E.; Billeter, S. R.; Fennen, J.; Torda, A. E.; Huber, T.; Krüger, P.; van Gunsteren, W. F. The GROMOS biomolecular simulation package J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 3596
39. Schmid, N.; Christ, C. D.; Christen, M.; Eichenberger, A. P.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Architecture, implementation and parallelisation of the GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011, in press.
40. Kunz, A. P. E.; Allison, J. R.; Geerke, D. P.; Horta, B. A. C.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Riniker, S.; Schmid, N.; van Gunsteren, W. F. New functionalities in the GROMOS biomolecular simulation software. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, in press.
41. Riniker, S.; Christ, C. D.; Hansen, H.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Oostenbrink, C.; Steiner, D.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Computation of relative free energies for ligand protein binding, solvation and conformational transitions using the GROMOS biomolecular simulation software. J. Phys. Chem. 2011, submitted.
42. Schmid, N.; Allison, J. R.; Dolenc, J.; Eichenberger, A. P.; Kunz, A. P. E.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Biomolecular structure refinement using the GROMOS simulation software J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 10.1007/s10858-011-9534-0
43. Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical-integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n -alkanes J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 327
44. Allison, J. R.; Boguslawski, K.; Fraternali, F.; van Gunsteren, W. F. A refined, efficient mean solvation force model that includes the interior volume contribution J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 4547
45. Kirkwood, J. G. Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures J. Chem. Phys. 1935, 3, 300
46. van Gunsteren, W. F.; Billeter, S. R.; Eising, A. A.; Hünenberger, P. H.; Krüger, P.; Mark, A. E.; Scott, W. R. P.; Tironi, I. G. Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide; vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich and BIOMOS b.v.: Zürich, Groningen, 1996.
47. Lee, B.; Richards, F. M. Interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility J. Mol. Biol. 1971, 55, 379
48. Hasel, W.; Hendrickson, T. F.; Still, W. C. A rapid approximation to the solvent accessible surface areas of atoms Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1988, 1, 103
49. Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features Biopolymers 1983, 22, 2577
50. Koehler, J. E. H.; Saenger, W.; van Gunsteren, W. F. On the occurrence of three-center hydrogen bonds in cyclodextrins in crystalline form and in aqueous solution: Comparison of neutron diffraction and molecular dynamics results J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1988, 6, 181
51. Daura, X.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Mark, A. E. Folding-unfolding thermodynamics of a α-heptapeptide from equilibrium simulations Proteins 1999, 34, 269
52. Riniker, S.; Kunz, A. P. E.; Gunsteren, W. F. On the calculation of the dielectric permittivity and relaxation of molecular models in the liquid phase J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 1469
53. Widom, B. Some topics in theory of fluids J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 2808
54. Liu, H. Y.; Mark, A. E.; vanGunsteren, W. F. Estimating the relative free energy of different molecular states with respect to a single reference state J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 9485
55. Zwanzig, R. W. High-temperature equation of state by a perturbation method. I. nonpolar gases J. Chem. Phys. 1954, 22, 1420
56. Torrie, G. M.; Valleau, J. P. Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 187
57. Schlitter, J. Estimation of absolute and relative entropies of macromolecules using the covariance-matrix Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 215, 617
58. Wang, D.; Friedmann, M.; Gattin, Z.; Jaun, B.; van Gunsteren, W. F. The propensity of β -aminoisobutyric acid (=2-methylalanine; Aib) to induce helical secondary structure in an β -heptapeptide: A computational study Helv. Chim. Acta 2010, 93, 1513
59. Allison, J. R.; Müller, M.; van Gunsteren, W. F. A comparison of the different helices adopted by β- and α-peptides suggests different reasons for their stability Protein Sci. 2010, 19, 2186