Compartmental models of migratory dynamics

Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 245-259

  Knisley, J ^a   Schmickl, T ^b   Karsai, I ^a  

^a EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Compartmental models; Erlang; Exponential; Poisson

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; COMPARTMENTAL MODEL; ERLANG; EXPONENTIAL; FUNDAMENTAL THEOREMS; HIGHLY NONLINEAR; MIGRATORY DYNAMICS; POISSON; PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS; SEASONAL MIGRATION; SIZE SCALE;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; USER INTERFACES;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053993140     PISSN: 09735348     EISSN: 17606101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/mmnp/20116613     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. Allarakhia, A. Wensley. Systems biology: melting the boundaries in drug discovery research. Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries, (2005), 262-274.
2. L. Allen. An Introduction to mathematical biology, Pearson, New York, 2007.
3. S. Bauer, Z. Barta, B. Ens, G. Hays, J. McNamara, M. Klassen. Animal migration: linking models and data beyond taxonomic limits. Biol. Lett., 5 (2009), No. 4, 433-435.
4. R. Baxter. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 8 (1977), 255-93.
5. W. Bialek, D. Botstein. Introductory science and mathematics education for the 21th century biologists. Science, 303 (2004), 788-790.
6. J. Bower. Looking for Newton: realistic modeling in modern biology. Brains, Minds and Media, 1 (2005), bmm217 (urn:nbn:de:0009-3-2177).
7. V. Buonaccorsi, A. Skibiel. A striking demonstration of the Poisson distribution. Teach. Stat, 27 (2005), 8-10.
8. C. Cobelli. Modeling and identification of endocrine-metabolic systems. Theoretical aspects and their importance in practice. Math. Biosci., 72 (1984), 263-289.
9. J. Cohen. Mathematics Is Biology's Next Microscope, Only Better; Biology Is Mathematics' Next Physics, Only Better. PLoS Biol., 2 (2004), e439. Published online 2004 December 14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020439.
10. J. Crow and M. Kimura. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York, 1970.
11. M. Evans, N. Hastings, B. Peacock. Erlang distribution. Ch. 12 in Statistical Distributions, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 2000, 71-73.
12. A. Ford. Modeling the environment. Island Press, 2010.
13. W. Granta, J. Matisb, and T. Millerb. A Stochastic Compartmental Model for Migration of Marine Shrimp. Ecological Modeling, 54 (1991), 1-15.
14. L. Gross. Quantitative training for life science students. BioScience, 44 (1994), 59.
15. P. Higgs. Frequency distributions in population genetics parallel those in statistical physics. Physical Review E, (1995), No. 51, 95-101.
16. W. Hwang, Y. Cho, A. Zhang, M. Ramanathan. A novel functional module detection algorithm for protein-protein interaction networks. Algorithms for Molecular Biology (2006), No. 2, 24, doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-1-24.
17. J. Jacquez. Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine, 3rd ed., Biomedware, Ann Arbor, MI, 1996.
18. I. Karsai, G. Kampis. The crossroad between biology and mathematics: Scientific method as the basics of scientific literacy. BioScience, 60 (2010), 632-638.
19. J. Knisley. Netlogo Migration Simulations, http://math.etsu.edu/ symbiosis/migrations, (2011).
20. J. Knisley, I. Karsai, A. Godbole, M. Helfgott, K. Joplin, E. Seier, D. Moore, H. Miller. Storytelling in the Symbiosis Project. To appear in Undergraduate Mathematics for the Life Sciences: Processes, Models, Assessment, and Directions, MAA Lecture Notes, 2010.
21. J. Knisley. A 4-Stage Model of Mathematical Learning. The Mathematics Educator, 12 (2002), No. 1, 11-16.
22. D. Lauffenburger. Receptors. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
23. M. Malice, C. Lefevre. On Linear Stochastic Compartmental Models in Discrete Time. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 47 (1985), No. 2, 287-293.
24. D. Moore, M. Helfgott, A. Godbole, K. Joplin, I. Karsai, J. Knisley, H. Miller, E. Seier. Creating Quantitative Biologists: The Immediate Future of SYMBIOSIS. To appear in Undergraduate Mathematics for the Life Sciences: Processes, Models, Assessment, and Directions, MAA Lecture Notes, 2010.
25. J. Murray. Mathematical Biology. Springer, New York, 1989.
26. W. Reed, B. Hughes. Theoretical size distribution of fossil taxa: analysis of a null model. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modeling, 4 (2007), 12, doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-4-12
27. L. Steen, ed. Math & Bio 2010: Linking Undergraduate Disciplines. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 2005.
28. D. Usher, T. Driscoll, P. Dhurjati, J. Pelesko, L. Rossi, G. Schleiniger, K. Pusecker, H. White. A transformative model for undergraduate quantitative biology education. CBE Life Sci Educ., 9 (2010), No. 3, 181-188.
29. D. Welch, E. Rechisky, M. Melnychuk, A. Porter, C. Walters. Survival of Migrating Salmon Smolts in Large Rivers With and Without Dams. PLoS Biol, 6 (2008), No. 10, e265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060265.
30. U. Wilensky. NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL, (1999).