Career flexibility and family-friendly policies: An nih-funded study to enhance women's careers in biomedical sciences

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1485-1496

  Villablanca, Amparo C ^a   Beckett, Laurel ^a   Nettiksimmons, Jasmine ^a   Howell, Lydia P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; CAREER MOBILITY; CAREER PLANNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FACULTY PRACTICE; FAMILY COUNSELING; FAMILY FRIENDLY POLICY; FAMILY LEAVE; FEMALE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VETERINARY MEDICINE; WOMEN CAREER; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE DISCIPLINES; CAREER MOBILITY; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); UNITED STATES; WOMEN, WORKING;

EID: 80053954228     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: 1931843X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2737     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beyond bias and barrier: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, 2007.
2. Women in US academic medicine statistics. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/ members/gwims/statistics/ (accessed April, 2011).
3. Nonemaker L.Women physicians in academic medicine:New insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med 2000;342:399-405.
4. Magrane D, Jolly P. The changing representation of men and women in academic science and engineering. Analysis in Brief, American Association of Medical Colleges. 2005;5:1-2.
5. Jeffe DB, Andriole DA, Hageman HL, Whelan AJ. The changing paradigm of contemporary U.S. allopathic medical school graduates' career paths: Analysis of the 1997-2004 national AAMC Graduation Questionnaire database. Acad Med 2007;82:888-894. (Pubitemid 47339822)
6. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA 1995;273:1022-1025.
7. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, Phillips CF, Kelch RP, Schaller JG. Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1282-1289. (Pubitemid 26349271)
8. Ash AS, Carr PL, Goldstein R, Freidman RH. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity? Ann Intern Med 2004;141:205-212. (Pubitemid 39030870)
9. Hamel MB, Ingelfinger JR, Phimiter E, Solomon CG. Women in academic medicine: Progress and challenges. N Engl J Med 2006;355:310-312. (Pubitemid 44079348)
10. Spain D, Bianchi SM. Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1996.
11. Sanberg D, Ehrdardt AA, Mellins CA, Ince SE, Meyer- Bahlburg FLH. The influence of individual and family characteristics upon career aspirations of girls during childhood and adolescence. Sex Roles 1987;16:649-668.
12. Wolfe L, Betzs NE. Traditionality of choice and sex role identification as moderators of the congruence of occupat ional choice in college women. J Vocational Behav 1981;18:43-55.
13. Reid P, Paludi MA. Developmental psychology of women: Conception to adolescence. In: Denmark FL, ed. Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1993:193-221.
14. Xie Y, Shauman KA. Modeling of sex-typing of occupational choice: Influences of occupational structure. Sociol Methods Res 1997;26:233-261.
15. Marini M, Brinton MC. Sex typing in occupational socialization. In: Reskin B, ed. Sex Segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1984:192-232.
16. Long JE. From scarcity to visibility: Gender diferences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.
17. Cropsey KL, Masho SW, Shiang R, Sikka V, Kornstein SG, Hampton CL. Why do faculty leave? Reasons for attrition of women and minority faculty from a medical school: Four year results. J Womens Health 2008;17:1111-1118.
18. Osborn EH, Ernster VL, Martin JB. Women's attitudes toward careers in academic medicine at the University of San Francisco. Acad Med 1992;67:59-62.
19. Mason MA, Goulden M. Do babies matter (part II)? Closing the baby gap. 2004. Available at www.aaup.org/AAUP/ pubsres/academe/2004/ND/Feat/04ndmaso.htm Accessed March 22, 2011.
20. Kerckhoff A. Diverging pathways: Social structure and career deflections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
21. O'Rand A. Structuration and individualization: The life course as a continuous multilevel process. In: Kerckhoff AC, ed. Generating social stratification: Toward a new research agenda. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.
22. O'Rand AM, K., ML., Concepts in the life cycle: Their history, meanings, and uses in the social sciences. Annu Rev Sociol 1990;16:241-262.
23. Sullivan B, Hollenshead C, Smith G. Developing and implementing work-family policies for faculty. Academe 2004;90:24-27. (Pubitemid 40366317)
24. R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010.
25. Borges NJ, Manuel RS, Elam CL, Jones BJ. Differences in motives between millennial and generation X medical students. Med Educ 2010;44:570-576.
26. Borges NJ, Manuel RS, Elam CL, Jones BJ. Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school. Acad Med 2006;81:571-576. (Pubitemid 44270804)
27. Howell LP, Servis G, Bonham AC. Multigenerational challenges in academic medicine. UC Davis' responses. Acad Med 2005;80:527-532. (Pubitemid 40734333)
28. Howell LP, Joad JP, Callahan E, Servis G, Bonham AC. Generational forecasting in academic medicine: A unique method of planning for success in the next two decades. Acad Med 2009;84:985-993.
29. American Council on Education. Creating options:Models for flexible faculty career pathways. An ACE-Center for Effective Leadership & Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Project. http:// www.acenet.edu/AM/Template.cfm?Section = Home&Template = /CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID= 5663 (accessed April, 2011).
30. Asante EO. Managing in the generation gap. Radiol Manage 2001;23:48-49.
31. Bickel J, Brown AJ. Generation X: Implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers. Acad Med 2005;80:203-204.
32. Clausing SL, Kurtz DL, Prendeville J, Walt JL. Generational diversity-The Nexters. AORN J 2003;78:373-379.
33. Greene J. What nurses want: Different generations, different expectations. Hosp Health Netw 2005;79:34-38, 40-42.
34. Lancaster L, Stillman D. Tips on minimizing generational collisions. Reflect Nurs Leadership 2003;29:10-12.
35. Romanelli F, Ryan M. A survey of attitudes and beliefs of generation X pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ 2003;67:72-77.
36. Santos SR, Cox KS. Generational tension among nurses: Baby-boomers and generation X-ers: The silent treatment doesn't work. Am J Nurs 2002;102:11.
37. Trower CA, Making academic dentistry more attractive to new teacher-scholars. J Dent Educ 2007;71:601-605.
38. Leigh JP, Kravitz RL, Schembri M, Samuels SJ, Mobley S. Physician career satisfaction across specialties. Arch Intern Med 2008;162:1577-1584.
39. Association of American Medical Colleges. Differences in U.S. Medical School Faculty Job Satisfaction by Gender. Analysis in brief 2008;84:8. https://www.aamc.org/download/ 67970/data/aibvol8no.7.pdf (accessed April, 2011)