Crafting interactivity for stakeholder engagement: Transforming assumptions about communication in science and policy

Health Physics

Volumn 101, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 531-535

  Aakhus, Mark ^a,b  

^a State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

International Radiation Protection Association; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; public information; risk communication

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RADIATION PROTECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; POLICY MAKING; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053945403     PISSN: 00179078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318222ede0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. th Biennial Conference on Argumentation. Washington, DC: National Communication Association; 2009, 33-40.
2. Aakhus M. Communication as design. Communication Monographs 74:112-117; 2007.
3. Aakhus M. Science Court: case study in designing discourse to manage policy controversy. Knowledge Technol Soc 12:20-37; 1999.
4. Aakhus M, Jackson S. Technology, interaction, and design. In: Fitch K, Sanders R, eds. Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005: 411-436.
5. de Moor A, Aakhus M. Argument support: from technologies to tools. Communications ACM 49:93-98; 2006.
6. Fisher F, Forester J. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992.
7. Gastil J. Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008.
8. Jackson S. Designing countermoves to reshape a disagreement space. In: Riley P, ed. Engaging argument: selected papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation. Washington, DC: National Communication Association; 2005.
9. Jackson S. Black-box arguments. Argumentation 22:437-446; 2008.
10. Jacobs S, Aakhus M. What do mediators do with words: implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Q 29:177-203; 2002.
11. Majone G. Evidence, argument, & persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1989.
12. Schön D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.
13. Simon H. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001.
14. Tracy K. Challenges of ordinary democracy: a case study in deliberation and dissent. State College: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2010.