Technology, interaction, and design

Handbook of Language and Social Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 411-435

  Aakhus, Mark ^a   Jackson, Sally ^b  

^a Rutgers University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079473873     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Aakhus, M. (1999). Science court: A case study in designing discourse to manage policy controversy. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 12(2), 20-37.
2. Aakhus, M. (2000, November). Virtual dialectics: Support for critical reflection in online, experience-based learning communities. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Annual Convention, Seatde, WA.
3. Aakhus, M. (2001a). Technocratic and design stances toward communication expertise: How GDSS facilitators understand their work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(A), 341-371.
4. Aakhus, M. (2001b). Designing web-based interactional tools to support learning from experience. In M. Schoop & J. Taylor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (pp. 51-68). Aachen, Germany: RWTH Aachen.
5. Aakhus, M. (2002). Modeling reconstruction in groupware technology. In E H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 121-136). Amsterdam: SICSAT.
6. Anderson, R. J. (1994). Representation and requirements: The value of ethnography in system design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 151-182.
7. Baym, N. (1996). Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 315-345.
8. Boden, D. (1994). Tfte business of talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9. Bowker, G. C, &Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Bowker, G. C, & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12. Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic Action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13. Carbaugh, D. (1996). Situating selves: The communication of social identities in American scenes. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Comarof FJ., & Roberts, S. (1981). Rules and processes: The culturallogic of dispute inan African context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-162.
16. Craig, R. T, & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248-272.
17. De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In R Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in social settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ehn, P. (1992). Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In P. S. Adler & T. A. Winograd (Eds.), Usability: Turning technologies into tools (pp. 96-132). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoidingpolitics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Flores, E, Graves, M., Hartfield, B., & Winograd, T. (1988). Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6, 153-172.
22. Garcia, A. C, & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 337-367.
23. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper.
25. Goldsmith, D. J., & Fitch, K. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476.
26. Hamblin, C. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
27. Heath, C, & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29. Hughes, J., O'Brien, J., Rodden, T, & Rouncefield, M. (2000). Ethnography, communication, and support for design. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsch, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design (pp. 187-214). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
31. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32. Jackson, S. (1998). Disputation by design. Argumentation, 12, 183-198.
33. Jackson, S. (1999). The importance of being argumentative: Designing disagreement into teaching/learning dialogues. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, C.A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings oftheFourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 392-396). Amsterdam: SICSAT (International Centre for the Study of Argumentation).
34. Jackson, S. (2002). Designing argumentation protocols for the classroom. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 105-120). Amsterdam: SICSAT.
35. Jackson, S. A., & Madison, C. (1999). Instruction by design: Technology in the discourse of teaching and learning. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research and methods (2nd ed., pp. 393-408). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Jackson, S., & Wolski, S. (2001). Identification of and adaptation to students' preinstructional beliefs in introductory communication research methods: Contributions of interactive web technology. Communication Education, 50, 189-205.
37. Jacobs, S. (1985). Language. In M. Knapp & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 313-343). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Jacobs, S., Jackson, S., Hallmark, J., Hall, B., & Stearns, S. (1987). Ideal argument in the real world: Making do in mediation. In J. W. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices (pp. 291-298). Annandale, VA: SCA.
39. Jacobs, S. (1989a). Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation, 3, 23-43.
40. Jacobs, S. (1989b). Finding common ground and zones of agreement: Two models of rationality for conflict resolution. In B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 511-516). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
41. Jacobs, S., Jackson, S., Stearns, S. A., & Hall, B. (1991). Digressions in argumentative discourse: Multiple goals, standing concerns, and implicatures. In K. Tracy (Ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linkinggoals and discourse (pp. 43-62, chap. 3), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Johansen, R. (1989). Groupware: Computer support for business teams. New York: Free Press.
43. Jones, J. C. (1992). Design methods (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
44. Kasesniemi, E., &Rautiainen, P. (2002). Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 170-192). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Katriel, T, & Philipsen, G. (1981). "What we need is communication": "Communication" as a cultural category in some American speech. Communication Monographs, 48, 301-317.
46. Katz, J., & Aakhus, M. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Kaufer, D. S., & Butler, B. S. (1996). Rhetoric and the arts of design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50. Kyburg, H. (1991). Normative and descriptive ideals. In R. Cummins & J. Pollock (Eds.), Philosophy and Ah Essays at the interface (pp. 129-139). Levinson, S. (1979). Activity types and Language. Linguistics, 37, 365-399.
51. Lowgren, J. (1995). Applying design methodology to software development. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 87-95). New York: ACM Press.
52. Lowgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (1999). Design methodology and design practice. Interactions, 6, 13-20.
53. Luff, P., Gilbert, N., & Frohlich, D. (1990). Computers and conversation. New York: Academic Press.
54. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (Eds.). (2000). Workplace stxulies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
55. Lyytinen, K, Maaranen, P., & Knuuttila, J. (1994). Groups are not always the same: An analysis of group behaviors in electronic meeting sytems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2, 261-284.
56. Lyytinen, K, & Ngwenyama, O. (1999). Sharrock and Button... and much ado about nothing: How to build windmills in CSCW research and then attack them. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 8, 285-293.
57. Mateosian, G. (1993). Reproducingrape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Maynard, D. (1984). Inside plea bargaining: The Language of negotiation. New York: Plenum Press.
59. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60. Ngwenyama, O, & Lyytinen, K. (1997). Groupware environments as Action constitutive resources: A social framework for analyzing groupware technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6, 71-93.
61. O'Keefe, B.J. (1988.) The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55, 80-103.
62. O'Keefe, D. (1987, November). Message description. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Boston, MA.
63. Petroski, H. (1985). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. New York: St. Martin's Press.
64. Philipsen, G. (1997). A theory of speech codes. In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 119-156). Albany: State University of New York Press.
65. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago.
66. Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.
67. PuroJ. (2002). Finland: A mobile culture. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.),Perpetttalcontiict:M()bileconimuniciition, private talk, public performance (pp. 19-29). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68. Rheinfrank, J., & Evenson, S. (1996). Design languages. In T. Winograd (Eds.), Bringing design to software (pp. 63-80). New York: ACM Press.
69. Schegloff, E. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
70. Schegloff, E. (2002). Opening sequencing. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 326-385). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
72. Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
73. Schwartzman, H. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum.
74. Sharrock, W, & Button, G. (1997). On the relevance of Habermas' theory of communicative Action for CSCW. CSCW: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6, 369-389.
75. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. New York: Wiley.
76. Smith, M., Cadiz, J. J., & Burkhalter, B. (2000). Conversation trees and threaded chats. In Proceedings of the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 97-105). New York: ACM Press.
77. Star, S. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 377-391.
78. Star, S., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5, 9-30.
79. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
80. Suchman, L. (1997). Do categories have politics? The Language/Action Perspective reconsidered. In B. Friedman (Ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 91-105). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1994), 2(3), 177-190.
81. Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82. Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315-343.
83. Tracy, K, van Dusen, D., & Robinson, S. (1987). "Good" and "bad" criticism: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Communication, 37, 46-59.
84. Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussion. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.
85. Van Eemeren, F. H, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
86. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
87. Willard, C. (1987). Valuing Dissensus. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation across the lines of discipline (pp. 145-158). Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.
88. Winograd, T. (1997). Categories, disciplines, and social coordination. In B. Friedman (Ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 107-113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1994), 2(3), 191-197.
89. Winograd, T, & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.